Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Red States Turning Blue
02/11/08 | Antenna Wilde

Posted on 02/11/2008 6:02:50 PM PST by Antenna Wilde

by Antenna Wilde

As the GOP struggles to find it's "voice", the nation seems to have run off with Obama. Looking over the charts and numbers, I find it increasing difficult to come to any other conclusion.

Not only is he mopping up the blue states, he seems to be doing as well—if not better—in the red ones. Take Idaho: huge victory for the GOP in 2004 (Bush won the state with 69%). And here's Obama sweeping Idaho on Super Tuesday with a stunning 80%... to Hillary Clinton's 17.

While all of Hillary victories (except Arkansas) have been in the mid 50's, Obama's have overshadowed her—especially in the red states like Alaska, who gave him 74% to her 25%. Here's a list of the more striking RED STATE victories for Obama over Clinton, in percentages:

Colorado: 67 to 32 Utah: 57 to 39 Kansas: 74 to 26 N. Dakota: 61 to 37 Georgia: 66 to 31 S. Carolina: 55 to 27

Some people may say, "Hey, he won states like South Carolina and Georgia because of the black vote." OK, but how do you explain the rest of them?There is a logical argument to be made for people's utter detest of Hillary Clinton. True, but then why not switch over to McCain? He's been shown to be popular among Independent and swing voters. And how do you explain Obama splitting the vote with Hillary in states like New Mexico, where she (apparently?) gets the latino vote?

Finally, look at Kansas: huge red state like Idaho... and second biggest Obama victory.

It's obvious Obama should get the Democratic nomination, but would someone tell me: why is he sweeping the red states?


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: Alabama; US: Idaho; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: 2008; democrat; ibtz; id2008; obama; purplestates; republican; vikingkitties; zot; zotz4breakfast
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-125 next last

1 posted on 02/11/2008 6:02:54 PM PST by Antenna Wilde
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Antenna Wilde

Wow, I guess the popular Oprah will get her way after all. People idolize her and her Obama too, so it seems.


2 posted on 02/11/2008 6:04:11 PM PST by Theodore R. ( Cowardice is still forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Antenna Wilde
people are just more liberal they used to be. Sign of the times... Blame vales, technology, hollywood, etc, whatever you want.

JFK would be considered a right wing fanatic compared to today's politicians...

3 posted on 02/11/2008 6:06:47 PM PST by Battle Hymn of the Republic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Antenna Wilde
but would someone tell me: why is he sweeping the red states?

He's anti-Hillary, for now. She's hated more in red states than blue, I think. The general election will be just a little different in those states... and in others...

4 posted on 02/11/2008 6:07:01 PM PST by AbeKrieger (There is a special place in Hell for Lyndon Johnson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Antenna Wilde
"Take Idaho: huge victory for the GOP in 2004 (Bush won the state with 69%). And here's Obama sweeping Idaho on Super Tuesday with a stunning 80%... to Hillary Clinton's 17."

Oh, give it a rest.  If this author thinks a Democrat is going to win Idaho in the general election, he is a fool.

5 posted on 02/11/2008 6:07:20 PM PST by HawaiianGecko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Battle Hymn of the Republic

vales = values


6 posted on 02/11/2008 6:07:35 PM PST by Battle Hymn of the Republic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Antenna Wilde
It's obvious Obama should get the Democratic nomination, but would someone tell me: why is he sweeping the red states?

Newbie, he's winning DEMOCRATIC primaries in each state you mentioned. If he didn't win it, Hillary would have.

Geez.

7 posted on 02/11/2008 6:08:12 PM PST by LdSentinal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Antenna Wilde

wouldn’t that be 80% of the democrats that voted??? Not the population of registered voters


8 posted on 02/11/2008 6:08:58 PM PST by Jewels1091
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Antenna Wilde

I don’t see the significance of this. So Obama won the DEMOCRAT caucuses in some red states. So what? Democrats always get 100% of the vote in democrat caucuses.


9 posted on 02/11/2008 6:09:12 PM PST by elmer fudd (Fukoku kyohei)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HawaiianGecko

That’s 80% of the state’s democrats; not 80% of the state.


10 posted on 02/11/2008 6:09:26 PM PST by Constitution1st (Never, never, never quit - Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Antenna Wilde

Speaking of Red versus Blue... doesn’t the color designations switch again so that ‘Rats go back to their True Commie Red?


11 posted on 02/11/2008 6:10:01 PM PST by C210N (The television has mounted the most serious assault on Republicanism since Das Kapital.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Antenna Wilde

Red states are naturally more conservative. Even the lefties aren’t as die-hard as the big city lefties are.

Obama naturally does better there because folks don’t see him as lefty as Hillary.

That may not be it, but it makes sense here baring any other explanation.

Obama is very probematic too. We have got the worst field I have seen in my life zeroing in on doom this November.


12 posted on 02/11/2008 6:11:14 PM PST by DoughtyOne (That's right McStain, you'll get my vote when you peel it from my cold dead fingers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Antenna Wilde

Are you saying that Idaho is now a Blue state because Hillary didn’t win the Rat primary?


13 posted on 02/11/2008 6:12:30 PM PST by crazyhorse691 (The faithful will keep their heads down, their powder dry and hammer at the enemies flanks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elmer fudd

I wouldn’t be surprised if it is indicative of the legions on the right, having nothing to vote for in the GOP primary, crossing over to at least get the satisfaction of seeing Hillary go down to ignomonous defeat. (I am certainly tempted to do just that.) It would explain which the Democrats are getting 2x the turnout the GOP is this year.


14 posted on 02/11/2008 6:13:02 PM PST by FR Class of 1998 (I will never vote directly against my own vital interests)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Antenna Wilde

Do any of his backers have a friggin clue what he stands for? I think not.


15 posted on 02/11/2008 6:13:12 PM PST by squidly (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Antenna Wilde

Dems normally do win Dem primaries.


16 posted on 02/11/2008 6:13:16 PM PST by jazusamo (DefendOurMarines.org | DefendOurTroops.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal

No kidding. Imagine if a Democrat was winning the Republican primaries.... wait.... never, mind.


17 posted on 02/11/2008 6:13:16 PM PST by FreeAtlanta (Search for Folding Project - Join FR Team 36120)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Antenna Wilde
why is he sweeping the red states?

Red states have more real men. Real men detest Hillary. They aren't necessarily voting for Osama Obama, they are voting against Hitlery.

18 posted on 02/11/2008 6:13:59 PM PST by Vigilanteman (Are there any men left in Washington? Or are there only cowards? Ahmad Shah Massoud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Antenna Wilde

Whoop de doo. Red and blue are all starting to look the same anymore.


19 posted on 02/11/2008 6:14:27 PM PST by ovrtaxt (Member of the irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brushfires of freedom in the minds of men.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
It's not just Oprah, I think it has more to do with the alternatives - I think anti-Clinton feelings are as much a reason for Obama's success and, beside being an energizing, fresh face alternative to these two duds, he is simply the only alternative available to express this displeasure, .

BTW, the alternatives will really come into view in the landslide McCain is poised to experience in Nov.

20 posted on 02/11/2008 6:14:37 PM PST by TCats (The Clintons Are Not Just Wrong - They Are Certifiable AND Dangerous! See my Page)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-125 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson