Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Seniors, vets to get stimulus rebates (Senate Dems back off extended unemployment benefits, etc.)
AP on Yahoo ^ | 2/7/08 | Andrew Taylor - ap

Posted on 02/07/2008 11:18:21 AM PST by NormsRevenge

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

1 posted on 02/07/2008 11:18:24 AM PST by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Why is the stimulas package that gives taxpayers back their own money a good idea, but a tax cut is not?


2 posted on 02/07/2008 11:23:19 AM PST by Glennb51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

mis-leading headline: there’s a BIG difference between “vets” and “disabled vets”.


3 posted on 02/07/2008 11:23:31 AM PST by Manfred the Wonder Dawg (Test ALL things, hold to that which is True.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Glennb51

It’s all about control.

Tax cuts are keeping YOU in control of your wealth. A rebate is of money they’ve already taken, and can even give it to those that didn’t pay anything in the first place.

“Liberalism” is all about control. The quote marks indicate that “Liberalism” actually means the opposite. See below.

Liberal, root word liberty:

lib·er·ty (lbr-t)
n. pl. lib·er·ties
1.
a. The condition of being free from restriction or control.
b. The right and power to act, believe, or express oneself in a manner of one’s own choosing.
c. The condition of being physically and legally free from confinement, servitude, or forced labor. See Synonyms at freedom.
2. Freedom from unjust or undue governmental control.
3. A right or immunity to engage in certain actions without control or interference: the liberties protected by the Bill of Rights.


4 posted on 02/07/2008 11:27:35 AM PST by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Glennb51
Because the politicians giving you a rebate can take credit each time they do it, while a tax cut only gets voted on once.

I'm thinking of taking my rebate and adding an extra $500 to my estimated tax that quarter just to not stimulate the economy. :-P

5 posted on 02/07/2008 11:30:57 AM PST by KarlInOhio (Rattenschadenfreude: joy at a Democrat's pain, especially Hillary's pain caused by Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Glennb51

“Why is the stimulas package that gives taxpayers back their own money a good idea, but a tax cut is not?”

Maybe because the bribe is more obvious?


6 posted on 02/07/2008 11:33:40 AM PST by AuntB (" DON'T LET THE PRESS PICK YOUR CANDIDATE!" Mrs. Duncan Hunter 1/5/08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Manfred the Wonder Dawg

“mis-leading headline: there’s a BIG difference between “vets” and “disabled vets”.”

This IS confusing. I am not a vet but I am AM disabled, 60% rated by the VA. I never saw combat, never served in a hostile theatre....I receive decent checks from the va every month to live on....are they going to send me a “rebate” on money that I never paid in?

I may send it back if they do.


7 posted on 02/07/2008 11:35:01 AM PST by Grunthor (I promise in November to be just as loyal to the GOP as Juan McAmnesty has been)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Glennb51

“Why is the stimulas package that gives taxpayers back their own money a good idea, but a tax cut is not?”

Because a lot of them aren’t really taxpayers. This way they get to feel good about themselves.

Tax rebates are for non-taxpayers and are good, tax cuts, well, those are just for the greedy rich, so we can’t have any of that going on.


8 posted on 02/07/2008 11:38:10 AM PST by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Glennb51

It micro-manages better: You tax the he** out of people, then if it looks like you went overboard and it starts to affect the economy, you give a bit back so they will buy more ipods.

Repeat as needed.


9 posted on 02/07/2008 11:39:24 AM PST by RobRoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Grunthor

If you’re not a vet why does the VA send you anything?


10 posted on 02/07/2008 11:48:46 AM PST by Beagle8U (FreeRepublic -- One stop shopping ....... Its the Conservative Super WalMart for news .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RobRoy
"It micro-manages better: You tax the he** out of people, then if it looks like you went overboard and it starts to affect the economy, you give a bit back so they will buy more ipods. Repeat as needed."

Yep. Wrong medicine. We're not consuming too much, we are importing too much. Fix that.

11 posted on 02/07/2008 11:51:53 AM PST by ex-snook ("Above all things, truth beareth away the victory.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ex-snook

Oops. Yer right.

I meant “buy more lattes and big macs”.


12 posted on 02/07/2008 12:02:13 PM PST by RobRoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Manfred the Wonder Dawg

How does the bill define disabled vets? I have a disability from the VA that is service connected but I would hardly consider myself disabled.


13 posted on 02/07/2008 12:14:52 PM PST by ops33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Seniors and retirees vote in huge numbers and percentages compared to the general population. Since this legislation should be named the “Incumbency Protection Act of 2008,” I’m amazed they were excluded at all. “Whoa Dudes! We gotta get this thing changed ASAP.”


14 posted on 02/07/2008 12:43:18 PM PST by NaughtiusMaximus (Refusing to calm down since the Waco massacre.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grunthor

I am not a vet but I am AM disabled, 60% rated by the VA. I never saw combat, never served in a hostile theatre....I receive decent checks from the va every month to live on....are they going to send me a “rebate” on money that I never paid in?
___________________________________________

how did you manage to do that ?????


15 posted on 02/07/2008 1:57:13 PM PST by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

What about ILLEGALS???


16 posted on 02/07/2008 2:14:31 PM PST by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Glennb51
Why is the stimulas package that gives taxpayers back their own money a good idea, but a tax cut is not?

Because it has to be reported as taxable income? Just a guess. Always assume the maximum greed factor when dealing with politicians.

What amazes me is how very proud these pukes are of their "swift" action on this. It took them three weeks of carping, infighting and nail biting to figure out what to do with OUR money.

17 posted on 02/07/2008 3:27:26 PM PST by Bloody Sam Roberts (Bureaucracy is a parasite that preys on Free Thought and suffocates Free Spirit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
This is so stupid.

As a part time student, I took an Accounting class last Semester. I went for tutoring, couple of young guys helping, one just got picked up by a top 4 accounting firm former Navy Man. He and his bud were talking about their days as high school wrestlers, they were top guys in their weight classes. We were talking about the GM 32 Billion right down, and how do address it from an accounting standpoint.

I then mentioned what GM needs is lower Corp.-Tax rates to help them through these times.

I do not know what their politics were, but did I unleash a hurricane.

These guys became animated, darn near angry and railed against our high Corporate Tax Rates. The point is these young lads get it, more so than Reid and all the clowns in the Senate.

They should listen to these kids, not some Keynesian balderdash.

18 posted on 02/07/2008 3:38:48 PM PST by taildragger (The Answer is Fred Thompson, I do not care what the question is.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge; writer33; AT7Saluki
$500 for individuals

Hey! Whatever happened to the $600 they promised? They CUT $100 from everyone's pocket? Greedy RATS...

19 posted on 02/07/2008 4:09:57 PM PST by Libloather (February is Liberal Awareness Month.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

so the people paying the bulk of the taxes get back nothing...nice excuse to redistribute wealth.

shocking this would happen in an election year. (sarc)


20 posted on 02/07/2008 4:14:15 PM PST by WOBBLY BOB (Conservatives are to McCain what Charlie Brown is to Lucy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson