Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

IBM explores 67.1m-core computer for running entire internet
The Register ^ | 5 February 2008 | Ashlee Vance

Posted on 02/06/2008 12:29:12 PM PST by ShadowAce

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last

1 posted on 02/06/2008 12:29:19 PM PST by ShadowAce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rdb3; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; GodGunsandGuts; CyberCowboy777; Salo; Bobsat; JosephW; ...

2 posted on 02/06/2008 12:29:46 PM PST by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

Assume it can be done. It won’t be done since the Internet is supposed to be a survivable system and that means dispersal of pieces and parts not coagulating everything into one box in one building.


3 posted on 02/06/2008 12:31:49 PM PST by RightWhale (oil--the world currency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce
But can it play Chess?
4 posted on 02/06/2008 12:32:25 PM PST by Condor51 (I will NOT vote for McInsane, ever -- even if Waterboarded!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

67 million of them will be dedicated to porn.


5 posted on 02/06/2008 12:34:03 PM PST by John Jorsett (scam never sleeps)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

With today’s internet, you need to cut five major cables in order to blackout a country like Iran. In the future, you’ll be able to cut one cable and blackout the world.


6 posted on 02/06/2008 12:34:06 PM PST by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

>> In theory, you can connect up to 16,384 racks, providing up to 67.1m cores with 32PB of memory. That’ll get some work done.

Now that would make a fairly respectable Quake box. :)


7 posted on 02/06/2008 12:36:58 PM PST by vikingd00d
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce
. In theory, you can connect up to 16,384 racks, providing up to 67.1m cores with 32PB of memory. That'll get some work done.

Each rack boasts IO bandwidth of 640Gb/s, which puts our theoretical system at 10.4Pb/s.

Fine, now show me the backplane and internet backbone that runs at over 100 GB/sec. Networking is not nearly advanced enough to centralize the internet.

8 posted on 02/06/2008 12:37:29 PM PST by Centurion2000 (su - | chown -740 us ./base | kill -9 | cd / | rm -r)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Condor51

F@ck chess, can it play Doom?


9 posted on 02/06/2008 12:37:51 PM PST by CarrotAndStick (The articles posted by me needn't necessarily reflect my opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

IBM still exists? Weren’t they bought by the Chinese Lenovo?


10 posted on 02/06/2008 12:38:04 PM PST by Jedi Master Pikachu ( What is your take on Acts 15:20 (abstaining from blood) about eating meat? Could you freepmail?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce
IBM's researchers have proposed tweaking the Blue Gene systems to run today's most popular web applications such as Linux, Apache, MySQL and Ruby on Rails.

Who writes this stuff?

11 posted on 02/06/2008 12:38:47 PM PST by Egon ("If all your friends were named Cliff, would you jump off them??" - Hugh Neutron)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jedi Master Pikachu

Only the laptop and PC assembly division; not their core technologies.


12 posted on 02/06/2008 12:39:07 PM PST by CarrotAndStick (The articles posted by me needn't necessarily reflect my opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

I bet SkyNet is behind this plan. Go get Sarah Connor


13 posted on 02/06/2008 12:39:26 PM PST by 11th Commandment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce
Each rack boasts IO bandwidth of 640Gb/s,

640 Gb/s ought to be enough for anybody.

14 posted on 02/06/2008 12:39:35 PM PST by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

I bet SkyNet is behind this plan. Go get em Sarah Connor


15 posted on 02/06/2008 12:39:44 PM PST by 11th Commandment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

Do you still have to code 1401 overlay modules? Am I showing my age?


16 posted on 02/06/2008 12:39:59 PM PST by duckman (I refuse to use a tag line...I mean it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: vikingd00d
Now that would make a fairly respectable Quake box

Talk about bringing the network to it's knees on your lunch break ...

17 posted on 02/06/2008 12:40:16 PM PST by tx_eggman ("they want to be judged on their intentions, not their results" - libtards official motto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

Skynet, is that you?


18 posted on 02/06/2008 12:40:19 PM PST by willgolfforfood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
67 million of them will be dedicated to porn.

I think that's the Ruby on Rails stuff.

19 posted on 02/06/2008 12:42:14 PM PST by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce
So, IBM wants to angle Blue Gene boxes at the web software jobs, believing it can run numerous applications on a single box at a lower cost than a cluster.

IBM has been very successful in implementing mainframe-based systems like this for IT/Help/Multi-user applications for a number of large, widely-spread companies. I've got a friend who has been doing this sort of stuff for several Canadian companies.

For IBM, it sounds like a scale-up project, rather than having to develop any particularly new techology.

Look for them to succeed big with this....

20 posted on 02/06/2008 12:45:12 PM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson