Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Massive Republican Voter Suppression in Southern Calilfornia!
News Talk Radio | 02-06-08 | PsyOp

Posted on 02/06/2008 9:01:01 AM PST by PsyOp

Reports are rolling into talk radio stations in San Diego about massive Republican vote suppression.

Thousands of Republican voters in San Diego and as far north as Los Angeles showed up to vote on Tuesday only to be told that they were registered "Non-Partisan". This meant that they could not vote for the Republican Primary candidates.

Non-Partisan (independent) voters in California can vote for Candidates in any other party, including the Democrat party, but are prohibited from voting in the Republican Primary unless they are registered as a Republican.

Rick Roberts [http://www.760kfmb.com] is currently reporting on this and has had hundreds of calls and thousands of e-mails from people who showed up to vote only to be told they were not registered as Republcans. Reports began rolling into the Roger Hedgecock show yesterday.

Several people have called in saying they witnessed this happening at polling place they worked at as volunteers. One gentleman stated that he believed at least 20% of the Republicans that showed up to vote were denied a Republican primary form because the roster showed them as "Non-Partisan".

The Republican Party in California has begun investigating this issue, but the mainstream media continues to report that Californias election "went smoothly".

It seems clear that someone or some group managed to tamper with the voter registration rolls. Either by direct access to the Registrars computer system, or by gaining access to voter information and then sending in registration cards in their name.

Southern California was projected to go heavily in favor in Mitt Romny.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: ca2008; california; keatingfive; primary; republican; romney; supertuesday; suppression; votefraud
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 461-464 next last
To: purpleraine

I don’t believe this was done to suppress a Romny vote, though it may have had that result. This is California. Most government workers are Democrats, including those that work for the registrars.

This was done by one or more Democrats to screw with Republican votes—period.


141 posted on 02/06/2008 10:07:27 AM PST by PsyOp (Truth in itself is rarely sufficient to make men act. - Clauswitz, On War, 1832.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

I am exaggerating, but with super delegates, electoral college, court decisions, and money, it’s hard to prove your case. If logic and facts mean I belong on another forum, what would they say about anyone who remained, after I left? But thanx for playing the gatekeeper.


142 posted on 02/06/2008 10:08:29 AM PST by purpleraine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: ArmstedFragg

Yes, and I have the purple stub to prove it.......


143 posted on 02/06/2008 10:08:44 AM PST by TMD (Keep Planned Parenthood out of our schools!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

You are wrong. Without exception, those calling in or e-mailing the radio shows say they have always been Registered as Republicans and showed up to the polls expecting to vote as such. Somewhere, somehow, their party affiliation was changed without their knowledge.


144 posted on 02/06/2008 10:09:46 AM PST by PsyOp (Truth in itself is rarely sufficient to make men act. - Clauswitz, On War, 1832.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: PsyOp

bump for later


145 posted on 02/06/2008 10:09:46 AM PST by markman46 (engage brain before using keyboard!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TADSLOS
I’m sure that the FEC will jump right on this...right after they figure out the Florida primary mess.

Right after they figure out the Florida 2000 mess..........

146 posted on 02/06/2008 10:10:26 AM PST by Red Badger ( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: PsyOp
That's easier to believe. I know when our regional poll supervisor came around, she was telling us all how she voted for Hillary. I suggested she move into the kitchen to discuss her political views, since we had voters coming in the door.

This was a full-time employee and an airhead. So the dem part can be easily inferred : ).

147 posted on 02/06/2008 10:11:06 AM PST by purpleraine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: Miss Didi

Rush just nailed it! Huckleberry is the McCain stalking horse and is too stupid to realize it! How encouraging is that?


148 posted on 02/06/2008 10:11:20 AM PST by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: Digital Sniper

A co-worker of mine had had some difficulty getting his name onto the rolls after having moved, so he went to a nearby polling place to vote and asked for a provisional ballot. He was told that they “weren’t giving out provisional ballots.”


149 posted on 02/06/2008 10:11:34 AM PST by william clark (DH4WH08 - Ecclesiastes 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Yeah, I thought about that after I posted. Good catch.


150 posted on 02/06/2008 10:12:02 AM PST by TADSLOS (Conservatism means never having to say "I voted for John McCain for the sake of the GOP")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: PsyOp; CharlesWayneCT

I’ll co-sign for ops. We had many 12 or so who claimed to be life-time repubs and no change of address or any other contact with the registrar’s office.


151 posted on 02/06/2008 10:12:38 AM PST by purpleraine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: purpleraine

The most likely cause is a computer pattern or incompetence within the registrar’s office. But that would be too simple.

Simple? could be .. or.. every county has its own registrar of voters office, if I’m not mistaken.. this does need a good looking into.. Incompetence would need to be statewide or collusion in many of those offices..

It does need to be looked into.. now,some of you trying to downplay it , keep it up, but be aware that be it chicanery intentional or otherwise, we need to get the ball rolling.


152 posted on 02/06/2008 10:12:47 AM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed ... ICE’s toll-free tip hotline —1-866-DHS-2-ICE ... 9/11 .. Never FoRGeT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: jane1

The switch to open primary and back to semi-closed primary is one large source of the current confusion.


153 posted on 02/06/2008 10:13:34 AM PST by ArmstedFragg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: purpleraine
If logic and facts mean I belong on another forum, what would they say about anyone who remained, after I left? But thanx for playing the gatekeeper.

You are a newbie on a conservative forum espousing a liberal view. Every poster is a "gatekeeper" as we can ask the mods to check a suspicious poster. And you are skating on thin ice.

154 posted on 02/06/2008 10:13:44 AM PST by DJ MacWoW ("Make yourself sheep, and the wolves will eat you" Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: william clark
He was told that they “weren’t giving out provisional ballots.”

I hope he got those poll worker's names and the name of their supervisor. His rights were violated.

155 posted on 02/06/2008 10:13:44 AM PST by Digital Sniper (Hello, "Undocumented Immigrant." I'm an "Undocumented Border Patrol Agent.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: All; PsyOp
Here's the contact info for the SD Registrar of Voters

If this happened to you, please contact them.

156 posted on 02/06/2008 10:13:46 AM PST by newzjunkey (Don't Blame Me, I Voted For FRed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr._Joseph_Warren

Glad to see people so blase about vote fraud. Bodes well for the future of the Republic.


157 posted on 02/06/2008 10:14:37 AM PST by PsyOp (Truth in itself is rarely sufficient to make men act. - Clauswitz, On War, 1832.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: jane1

I, too, was surprised they let me choose which ballot I wanted even thought I’m registered non-partisan. I thought I would only be allowed a non-partisan ballot.

I did receive a helpful mailer from the Dems a couple of weeks ago that told me, as a non-partisan, I could ask for a Democrat ballot.


158 posted on 02/06/2008 10:14:40 AM PST by TMD (Keep Planned Parenthood out of our schools!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: Digital Sniper

I don’t think he did, but I told him to contact the registrar’s office today. This, incidentally, was in Riverside County.


159 posted on 02/06/2008 10:15:05 AM PST by william clark (DH4WH08 - Ecclesiastes 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: rockthecasbah

This also happened to my wife in the bay area!


160 posted on 02/06/2008 10:15:12 AM PST by roscommon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 461-464 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson