Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/05/2008 7:35:20 PM PST by Aristotelian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Aristotelian

Looks like Huck will win Missouri as well. Good nite for Huck. So far, a bad night for Mitt.


2 posted on 02/05/2008 7:36:13 PM PST by pissant (Time for a CONSERVATIVE party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Aristotelian

If Huckabee were to pull off a win in MO, to go along with WV, GA, TN, AL and AR, then he might get a little more time at the next debate.


4 posted on 02/05/2008 7:38:02 PM PST by mcjordansc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Aristotelian
Photobucket

McLiberal...the Bizarro World Barry Goldwater Senator from Arizona who will lose 49 states.

9 posted on 02/05/2008 7:42:58 PM PST by Eric Blair 2084 (Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms shouldn't be a federal agency...it should be a convenience store.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Aristotelian
Huck just keeps winning states no one thought he could win.

Feels like the hand of God.

12 posted on 02/05/2008 7:44:17 PM PST by tear gas (Because of the 22nd Amendment, we are losing President. Bush. Can we afford to lose him now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Aristotelian

I think the issues that Southerns care about most are pro-guns, pro-traditional values, and pro-life.

Huckabee has been correct on those issues far a long long time. He has never been pro-abortion, pro-gun control, or pro-gay rights. That matters to people

That is the reason he did well in the South.


16 posted on 02/05/2008 7:44:56 PM PST by RKB-AFG (1133)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Aristotelian

Super Tuesday Scorecard

McCain - OK (41), NY (101), DE (18), NJ (52), CT (30), IL (70), AZ (53)

Huckabee - AR (35), AL (48), WV (30), TN (55), GA (72)

Romney - UT (36), MA (43), ND (26), ?MT (25), ?MN (41)

? - Leading Caucus, but hasn't won yet.

NOTE:  The number in (##) represents Total number of delegates for the state, not the number won.

Despite all the gloom and doom on Romney, McCain is still far from being able to win the nomination.

20 posted on 02/05/2008 7:50:11 PM PST by Always Right (Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Aristotelian

Did anyone count how many times Fox news suggested Mitt drop out because he can’t go on? Hume has become a pompus dufus during the primaries. None of them are worth 2 cents. I’m switching over to CNN or Msnbc.


40 posted on 02/05/2008 8:04:15 PM PST by TheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Aristotelian

BTTT!


42 posted on 02/05/2008 8:06:10 PM PST by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Aristotelian

Arizona chose both Clinton and McCain. Sheesh!


45 posted on 02/05/2008 8:06:30 PM PST by AZLiberty (President Fred -- I like the sound of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Aristotelian

You know, the funny thing is: Huckabee loathes Mitt, McCain loathes humankind and Mitt, Mitt dislikes (okay, by now he should be loathing) McCain. Similarly, a large portion of conservatives despise McCain, and dislike both others somewhat less (judging from the polling numbers).

I know a lot of people won’t vote for McCain if he’s the nominee and I’ve heard a few others say the same about both other candidates.

But honestly, if the convention brokers & nominates Thompson (nearly happened for Reagan in ‘76, did happen for Harding & Garfield), what conservatives woul not vote for him? Even the most enthusiastic supporters of McCain haven’t badmouthed Thompson. Nor have I heard the same level of distaste from the enthusiastic supporters of the other candidates.

I just wonder - if we get Thompson, who wouldn’t support him?


46 posted on 02/05/2008 8:07:45 PM PST by Republicanus_Tyrannus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Aristotelian

These are not clean wins - 3-way split to the vote and 3-way split of delegates. Huck eked out tiny leads in these states, yet outside the southeast, was way way back.

It’s a 3-man CLUSTERHUCK.


64 posted on 02/05/2008 8:30:19 PM PST by WOSG ( better a convert than a traitor - Another Conservative for Mitt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson