Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: John Valentine
—yep—they remind me of the Perot “change” folks—

--(the last time I saw the most vociferous one of those that I had known, he was looking for the Lawrence County jail in Deadwood, SD so he could go serve time for his traffic offenses)—

11 posted on 02/03/2008 5:22:35 AM PST by rellimpank (--don't believe anything the MSM tells you about firearms or explosives--NRA Benefactor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: rellimpank

Perot had some good qualities - he fought for POWs, he loved this country, and he talked about NAFTA and the budget. I think he really is a good man, but deeply unPresidential. He should have realized Bush was a better man than Clinton. He ended up electing a damaged man, unfit for office.

The problem with Obama is he is a cypher - people just see what they want to see. If he really went all out and talked policy, things would change. He also has a thin skin, and is a bit foolish on foreign policy, among other things. When he talks of bringing the country together, if he was called on it, it would be to get Repubs to bend to liberalism. In some ways, he may be more bad for the country than Hillary. She’s less opaque.


27 posted on 02/03/2008 5:54:32 AM PST by PghBaldy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson