Posted on 02/02/2008 11:15:28 AM PST by TheLion
Romney, the former Massachusetts governor, had 59% of the vote with 3% of the towns holding caucuses reporting. Ron Paul trailed with 19%, John McCain had 18%, and Mike Huckabee and undecided votes each had about 2%.
(Excerpt) Read more at kjct8.com ...
Ronald Reagan and Romney are not the same person or characters.
Reagan was consistently a man of principle and conviction. He changed his views on matters and then stayed with them.
Romney is a flip flopper.
Not the same thing at all. It’s more Kerryesque.
Don’t try to be clever, it taxes your brain too much. Heaven knows it’s already being stretched to the max as it is.
Then that is your prerogative to dislike Ron Paul’s tax plan.
Hey, TheLion. This just went to the top of Breaking News... Woo Hoo!!
I don’t understand you you and I have posted elsewhere for a long time right!
Now just because some us are for Romney they are trolls?
When GWB was running a lot of Bush folks found FR and sign up just to be among the Bush folks!
Don’t mean they are shills tooties!:)
What? Like residing in a ward?
Well, at least us workin-for-free FReepers can compete against these shills, stave them off.
When push comes to shove, our resident heavy hitters always seem to show up for the kill.
I like metaphors more than I should. Go Mitt!
I’ve suspected you and Tennessee Nana are one and the same...thx for verifing it.
****
Yep they could own a desk pc also a laptop and drive others here nuts!
Long JW frname mixup. He knows what I mean. There’s Jed, even the last letter of fieldmarshalj is code for the J motif.
Resty, your post is making no sense. First of all, one of your own buddies started the conversation and believes that the anti-Romney people are trolls or paid shills. I provided information that I believe that there are pro-Romney shills and, yes, trolls on these threads, as well as McRino shills and Huckabee shills (though those seem to be less).
You really need to start from the beginning of the conversation before your begin your lectures, lol.
Romney was a Washington insider before he was an outsider
You are wrong Romney flip, but never flop!
Final results: Mitt got 55%; McCain came in second and Ron Paul came in third.
I’m not sure how many delegates Mitt got.
And he’s getting worse. I hope Maine is a sign conservatives have finally woken up.
The evidence contradicts your claims.
Sorry, I’m guilty too
You’ve illustrated my point here. It’s one thing for private citizens to post here, quite another for these paid people. They should identify themselves. To not do so is highly deceitful. If I had been, say, on Fred Thompson’s campaign staff (which I was accused of being), in the interest of honesty and full disclosure, I would feel compelled to reveal that fact, since I would not be speaking for myself as a private, unaffiliated citizen. I don’t view these tactics of having paid staffers hiding behind anonymity as any different than having campaign “plants” in an audience.
Do you really know what an insider is?
What are you smoking gal...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.