Wow! What a comeback. How can I ever expect to match wits with someone of such obvious high intellect as you.
Posted on 02/02/2008 11:15:28 AM PST by TheLion
Romney, the former Massachusetts governor, had 59% of the vote with 3% of the towns holding caucuses reporting. Ron Paul trailed with 19%, John McCain had 18%, and Mike Huckabee and undecided votes each had about 2%.
(Excerpt) Read more at kjct8.com ...
That's another lie. That would be of those who took the poll at the particular time you checked. In any event, the following remains true:
My goal is to elect conservatives. Free Republic’s goal is to elect conservatives. Romney is NO conservative.
295 posted on 01/31/2008 3:37:56 PM PST by Jim Robinson
A RINO is a RINO is a RINO, no matter how many people choose to vote for him, in any race, poll, or otherwise. Romney is a RINO.
Wow! What a comeback. How can I ever expect to match wits with someone of such obvious high intellect as you.
How are things in Billings, Mr. Simmons ? Or shall I call you Larry ?
Well, since your not going to support Romney, pick one,
22% McCain (DBM approved)
19% Paul (DBM approved)
5% Huckabee (DBM Approved)
Remember all, only the bottom three candidates are Drive-by approved.
And somehow, I’m sure your spam posts will merit being called an “enlightening post” by the MittNitWits, I suppose, lolol!
President-elect of your own padded cell. Does the ex-Governor know you are pretending to be him, Mr. Simmons ?
I eat spam many times a week, like that stuff. What makes your choice the best conservative?
Yes, bull$hitting is a full-time job for Joe Isuzu Romney.
LOL. I never understood why some people would want a screen name that is named after someone else, like a politician or entertainer. Kinda creepy.
As I have stated and poster earlier: He’s the most conservative one left standing after my first two choices left the race, that being 1) Tom Tancredo and 2) Duncan Hunter.
At least Ron Paul has a history of supporting limited government, is against the NAU, wants us out of the UN (and proposed a bill every year to get us out but the Rats and RINOs defeat it), is against abortion (he has proposed a bill every year that would define life at conception and it would become law of the land. After that, if you kill, it’s murder and it’s up to the states to prosecute murder, not the federal government), is in favor of denying citizenship to illegals’ offspring, and is a strict Constitutionist, among other things. These same ideals cannot be said of McRino or Romney.
I remember you from the old days of the Schiavo threads where I thought you were a class act. I didn't "get" the posters who just enjoyed the sport of camping out on those threads to try to bully, humiliate and intimidate. I still don't "get" that behavior, and probably never will. So, yeah, you're right...I don't have everything figured out.
See, if the candidate I was supporting was in a televised debate on a channel I didn't get, I'd be more interested in hanging out on a live thread telling me how my candidate was doing than I would be camping out on a thread for a candidate I disliked and poking his supporters in the eye with a sharp stick, over and over and over. Guess I'm just weird like that.
moderate_conservative
Since Feb 2, 2008
TinaJeannes
Since Nov 22, 2007
Tennessee Nana
Since Jan 11, 2007
That doesn't include established posters like meandog and earthdweller who have also started working and spamming for campaigns (both McCain).
There's plenty of this garbage going around on all sides.
Well, I can understand adding “fan” to a name or the like, but yes, it is kinda creepy.
Well, I’m glad you’re finally acknowledging how much of a con-artist your idol is.
That’s you. I don’t enjoy being on threads where I cannot see what is going on. The few times I have done that, the threads go too fast and furious and if/when I ask a question, some turd says it had already been asks why I wasn’t LISTENING better to the program, etc., etc.
Bullying? I’m hardly bullying. I post information on these threads to combat the lies or misrepresentations being made concerning Romney’s alleged conservativism. It is not so much for those who post, but more for those who just read. If all they see are half-truths concerning a matter, they will believe that is the only truth. You should know this already from the Schiavo threads. There were plenty of half-truths being spouted as facts when they were anything but.
I am no different here, it’s just that now, in this case, you are apparently either disagreeing with or not liking that all the facts and information is being posted.
You have moslem nurses who wont wash theur hands berfore they operate on you on the Romney groupie pay roll ???
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.