President Bush to Host North American Leaders' Summit [Security and Prosperity Partnership(SPP)]

White House.gov ^ | 31 Jan 2008 | Office of the Press Secretary

[proudofthesouth]

Concreting plans to make the U.S. and Mexico one country.

[1rudeboy]

And fluoridating the water supply.

[Travis McGee]

Treason ping.

[1rudeboy]

Treason? Do you even care what the word means anymore?

[FReepapalooza]

“Treason? Do you even care what the word means anymore?”

An everday occurance anymore.

[1rudeboy]

I’ll place you in the “word is meaningless” camp.

[DoughtyOne]

Do you even care about the polices they are going to be discussing? That’s it, attack a person who actually gives a damn about our sovereignty and self-determination and then act like you’re the man on high ground.

You need to sit up and smell the rotting fish bud.

[maclay]

Maybe in a few years, we’ll actually get to hear what was talked about, for the “NAU commemorative special” on CNN.

[DoughtyOne]

Thanks. I appreciate it.

[DoughtyOne]

Yes, that’s when we’ll hear about it, after the fact... or at the very best several weeks before the big vote, if there even is one. We’ll express our objections and the RP will join with the DP to disolve our nation.

[1rudeboy]

I don't see meeting the heads-of-state of two neighboring countries as "treason," much like I didn't see it as "treason" when Bush met the Pope. So instead of telling me to "sit up" you should be telling your friends to "step up."

If you're telling me it's treason, let's hear why . . . or is treason too difficult a concept to illustrate?

[maclay]

"In law, treason is the crime that covers some of the more serious acts of disloyalty to one's sovereign or nation" - Wiki

[1rudeboy]

Great! So let’s get started: how is meeting a head of state treason?

[maclay]

Well dependes on the head of state. Say a visit from President Hillary Clinton to Iran to discuss secret policy.

But back on topic, until we know the specifics of the meeting, we’re going to have to give the political elites the benefit of the doubt that they are working in the interest of soveriegnty, not in the path to it’s desctuction.

Anyone want to flip a coin for the future of our country? I think not.

[FReepapalooza]

“I’ll place you in the “word is meaningless” camp.”

well then,

I’ll place you in the “sovereignty is meaningless” camp.

[1rudeboy]

I agree that we can only go on the information we have. If the White House tells us the summit will discuss SPP initiatives, all we can do is note the SPP initiatives that have been made public (there are many).

I will note that the SPP initiatives made public do not amount to treason. If there are secret initiatives that do, we are screwed one way or the other. My point is that you can't skip the step. "The summit is treasonous because there are secret plans . . ." is more constructive than "the summit is treasonous because I say so."

[1rudeboy]

Any other words you care to add to the list of those you do not understand? It would save some trouble.

[redgirlinabluestate]

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1963445/posts
What John McCain Supports