Posted on 02/02/2008 8:33:32 AM PST by BGHater
As he noted in his State of the Union address, the President will be hosting the North American Leaders' Summit on April 21-22 in New Orleans. This fourth meeting of North American leaders since 2005 will continue our work on Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP) initiatives. It will also serve as an opportunity for the three leaders to discuss hemispheric and global issues of importance to North America.
Concreting plans to make the U.S. and Mexico one country.
And fluoridating the water supply.
Treason ping.
Treason? Do you even care what the word means anymore?
“Treason? Do you even care what the word means anymore?”
An everday occurance anymore.
I’ll place you in the “word is meaningless” camp.
Do you even care about the polices they are going to be discussing? That’s it, attack a person who actually gives a damn about our sovereignty and self-determination and then act like you’re the man on high ground.
You need to sit up and smell the rotting fish bud.
Maybe in a few years, we’ll actually get to hear what was talked about, for the “NAU commemorative special” on CNN.
Thanks. I appreciate it.
Yes, that’s when we’ll hear about it, after the fact... or at the very best several weeks before the big vote, if there even is one. We’ll express our objections and the RP will join with the DP to disolve our nation.
If you're telling me it's treason, let's hear why . . . or is treason too difficult a concept to illustrate?
Great! So let’s get started: how is meeting a head of state treason?
Well dependes on the head of state. Say a visit from President Hillary Clinton to Iran to discuss secret policy.
But back on topic, until we know the specifics of the meeting, we’re going to have to give the political elites the benefit of the doubt that they are working in the interest of soveriegnty, not in the path to it’s desctuction.
Anyone want to flip a coin for the future of our country? I think not.
“I’ll place you in the “word is meaningless” camp.”
well then,
I’ll place you in the “sovereignty is meaningless” camp.
I will note that the SPP initiatives made public do not amount to treason. If there are secret initiatives that do, we are screwed one way or the other. My point is that you can't skip the step. "The summit is treasonous because there are secret plans . . ." is more constructive than "the summit is treasonous because I say so."
Any other words you care to add to the list of those you do not understand? It would save some trouble.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.