Posted on 02/01/2008 5:11:26 PM PST by decimon
Researchers at Idaho National Laboratory, along with partners at Microcontinuum Inc. (Cambridge, MA) and Patrick Pinhero of the University of Missouri, are developing a novel way to collect energy from the sun with a technology that could potentially cost pennies a yard, be imprinted on flexible materials and still draw energy after the sun has set.
The new approach, which garnered two 2007 Nano50 awards, uses a special manufacturing process to stamp tiny square spirals of conducting metal onto a sheet of plastic. Each interlocking spiral "nanoantenna" is as wide as 1/25 the diameter of a human hair.
Because of their size, the nanoantennas absorb energy in the infrared part of the spectrum, just outside the range of what is visible to the eye. The sun radiates a lot of infrared energy, some of which is soaked up by the earth and later released as radiation for hours after sunset. Nanoantennas can take in energy from both sunlight and the earth's heat, with higher efficiency than conventional solar cells.
(Excerpt) Read more at inl.gov ...
That part is interesting.
Harvesting the sun's energy with antennas
By Rachel Courtland, INL science writer
INL researcher Steven Novack holds a plastic sheet of nanoantenna arrays, created by embossing the antenna structure and depositing a conductive metal in the pattern. Each square contains roughly 260 million antennas. Nanotechnology R&D usually occurs on the centimeter scale, but this INL-patented manufacturing process demonstrates nano-scale features can be produced on a larger scale.
Researchers at Idaho National Laboratory, along with partners at Microcontinuum Inc. (Cambridge, MA) and Patrick Pinhero of the University of Missouri, are developing a novel way to collect energy from the sun with a technology that could potentially cost pennies a yard, be imprinted on flexible materials and still draw energy after the sun has set.
The new approach, which garnered two 2007 Nano50 awards, uses a special manufacturing process to stamp tiny square spirals of conducting metal onto a sheet of plastic. Each interlocking spiral "nanoantenna" is as wide as 1/25 the diameter of a human hair.
Because of their size, the nanoantennas absorb energy in the infrared part of the spectrum, just outside the range of what is visible to the eye. The sun radiates a lot of infrared energy, some of which is soaked up by the earth and later released as radiation for hours after sunset. Nanoantennas can take in energy from both sunlight and the earth's heat, with higher efficiency than conventional solar cells.
"I think these antennas really have the potential to replace traditional solar panels," says physicist Steven Novack, who spoke about the technology in November at the National Nano Engineering Conference in Boston.
Taking antennas to the atomic level
The miniscule circuits absorb energy just like the antenna on your television or in your cell phone. All antennas work by resonance, the same self-reinforcing physical phenomenon that allows a high note to shatter glass. Radio and television antennas must be large because of the wavelength of energy they need to pick up. In theory, making antennas that can absorb electromagnetic radiation closer to what we can see is simple: just engineer a smaller antenna.
An array of nanoantennas, printed in gold and imaged with a scanning electron microscope. The deposited wire is roughly a thousand atoms thick. A flexible panel of interconnected nanoantennas may one day replace heavy, expensive solar panels.
But finding an efficient way to stamp out arrays of atom-scale spirals took a number of years. "It's not that this concept is new," Novack says, "but the boom in nanotechnology is what has really made this possible." The INL team envisions the antennas might one day be produced like foil or plastic wrap on roll-to-roll machinery. So far, they have demonstrated the imprinting process with six-inch circular stamps, each holding more than 10 million antennas.
It wasn't immediately obvious the structures might be used for solar power. At first, the researchers considered pairing the antennas with conventional solar cells to make them more efficient. "Then we thought to start from scratch," Novack says. "We realized we could make the antennas into their own energy harvesters."
An economical alternative
Commercial solar panels usually transform less that 20 percent of the usable energy that strikes them into electricity. Each cell is made of silicon and doped with exotic elements to boost its efficiency. "The supply of processed silicon is lagging, and they only get more expensive," Novack says. He hopes solar nanoantennas will be a more efficient and sustainable alternative.
The team estimates individual nanoantennas can absorb close to 80 percent of the available energy. The circuits themselves can be made of a number of different conducting metals, and the nanoantennas can be printed on thin, flexible materials like polyethylene, a plastic that's commonly used in bags and plastic wrap. In fact, the team first printed antennas on plastic bags used to deliver the Wall Street Journal, because they had just the right thickness.
By focusing on readily available materials and rapid manufacturing from inception, Novack says, the aim is to make nanoantenna arrays as cheap as inexpensive carpet.
Fine-tuning fine structures
The real trick to making the solar nanoantenna panels is to be able to predict their properties and perfect their design before printing them in the factory. While it is relatively easy to work out the physics of one resonating antenna, complex interactions start to happen when multiple antennas are combined. When hit with the right frequency of infrared light, the antennas also produce high-energy electromagnetic fields that can have unexpected effects on the materials.
So the researchers are developing a computer model of resonance in the tiny structures, looking for ways to fine-tune the efficiency of an entire array by changing factors like materials and antenna shape. "The ability to model these antennas is what's going to make us successful, because we can't see these things," Novack says. "They're hard to manipulate, and small tweaks are going to make big differences."
INL researchers Dale Kotter (left), Steven Novack, and Judy Partin are developing flexible plastic sheets of nanoantennas to collect solar energy.
A charged future
One day, Novack says, these nanoantenna collectors might charge portable battery packs, coat the roofs of homes and, perhaps, even be integrated into polyester fabric. Double-sided panels could absorb a broad spectrum of energy from the sun during the day, while the other side might be designed to take in the narrow frequency of energy produced from the earth's radiated heat.
While the nanoantennas are easily manufactured, a crucial part of the process has yet to be fully developed: creating a way to store or transmit the electricity. Although infrared rays create an alternating current in the nanoantenna, the frequency of the current switches back and forth ten thousand billion times a second. That's much too fast for electrical appliances, which operate on currents that oscillate only 60 times a second. So the team is exploring ways to slow that cycling down, possibly by embedding energy conversion devices like tiny capacitors directly into the antenna structure as part of the nanoantenna imprinting process.
"At this point, these antennas are good at capturing energy, but they're not very good at converting it," says INL engineer Dale Kotter, "but we have very promising exploratory research under way." Kotter and Novack are also exploring ways to transform the high-frequency alternating current (AC) to direct current (DC) that can be stored in batteries. One potential candidate is high-speed rectifiers, special diodes that would sit at the center of each spiral antenna and convert the electricity from AC to DC. The team has a patent pending on a variety of potential energy conversion methods. They anticipate they are only a few years away from creating the next generation of solar energy collectors.
PING
I agree. This may be something that makes current solar technology obsolete. I hope it pans out.
I'm scratching my head trying to think of anything that uses an antenna where the energy from that antenna doesn't need to be AMPLIFIED before that enegry is useable. That means that extra energy must be used.
Hardly. I am an electronic engineer by profession. Ask, rather than assume.
I challenge you to describe one item that uses an antenna resonant to any part of the EM spectrum that can gather enough energy to perform actual work without being amplified with another external source of power.
And let's leave out those old science fair air-powered radios that require headphones to produce a weak amount of audio.
marker to find later
Very few radio receivers (if that’s what you’re referring to) try to use a signal from a transmitter as powerful as the sun.
I’ve heard tell of people living next to 50,000 watt antennas picking up radio signals on their dental work. Does that count?
You apparently haven’t thought very far because if you did you would know that an antenna does nothing but convert electromagnetic energy to electrical. The bigger the antenna, the bigger the voltage to the conductor. They use arrays of radio dish antennas to search the galaxy because more antennas means more voltage And when you link MILLIONS of antennas together, you get a much larger voltage.
Try looking here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rectenna
and here:
http://www.techbriefs.com/content/view/1981/32/
and here:
http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy03osti/33263.pdf
and here:
http://charon.colorado.edu/Microwave/papers/2000/EuMC_JHnlBP_00.pdf
and here:
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?url=/iel1/2220/6808/00274732.pdf?arnumber=274732
and here:
http://sciencelinks.jp/j-east/article/200017/000020001700A0495811.php
and here:
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003AIPC..664..292A
and here:
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3957/is_200008/ai_n8914804
and here:
http://ece.colorado.edu/~pwrelect/Seconddraft/paper_archives/efficientbroadbandrf_apr2005.pdf
The problem in the original article are the rectifier diodes for use at infrared wavelengths, of which the article makes no mention. In metals, such as gold, the extinction length is about 1.5 wavelengths for IR. Semiconductor diodes will not work so other types are needed.
I can't think of one, but has anyone ever built a 10 million element array before, particularly one tuned to the biggest source of EM available.
I'm skeptical as well. I believe the challenge is gathering and storing anything from the array. Additionally, they make the claim that they "might" be able to achieve very high efficiencies, but how much IR is available? A 95% efficient 1m square panel may not keep my watch running.
did you even read the article???
thanks for the concise statement of fact. Better than I could have done. I don’t “engineer” electonics, I just fix whatever doesn’t work and apply new technology to solve current problems.
thanks for the concise statement of fact. Better than I could have done. I don’t “engineer” electonics, I just fix whatever doesn’t work and apply new technology to solve current problems.
Dude, most research winds up on the shelf. It’s very frustrating for researchers. But every little bit of original research is like a piece of a puzzle. If every bit of research had to pan out then research would not be done and break throughs would never be made.
Only problem with that theory is that you have a very large aperture with the radiotelescopes, whereas a molecular antenna would have a very small aperture.
Remember that the solar flux at all wavelengths is about 1300 watts/square meter. As hot as a small volume of air can get, like between a storm door and a regular door, in sunlight, makes you wonder if direct conversion to electricity is barking up the wrong tree. Leaving it as heat and light may be a better answer.
Those were the days. In business today if it doesn't have a high projected ROI it doesn't get done. Managers who's projects don't pan out don't last very long.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.