To: kinoxi
McCain and Romney are BOTH worse than having Hillary in the White House.
4 posted on
01/31/2008 9:31:17 PM PST by
Ol' Sparky
(Liberal Republicans are the greater of two evils)
To: Ol' Sparky
Obama is worse than any of them....
To: Ol' Sparky
McCain and Romney are BOTH worse than having Hillary in the White House.
Is it me, or is Ann starting to resemble Susan Estrich?
12 posted on
01/31/2008 9:33:54 PM PST by
Antoninus
(I won't flip for Mitt. I won't follow McCain down the drain. So I'm stuck with Huck!)
To: Ol' Sparky
“McCain and Romney are BOTH worse than having Hillary in the White House.”
While I understand your pain, this cannot be true.
Neither McCain or Romney have expressed the sentiment that they would personally try to regulate interest rates themselves - or place themselves in charge of the banking industry by preventing foreclosures.
Hillary really thinks she should personally be calling the shots on anything she can get her hands on.
She truly is a marxist.
I don’t like our choices - but anything is better than her.
To: Ol' Sparky
McCain and Romney are BOTH worse than having Hillary in the White House.I think you're running low on these:
![](http://www.marijuanaalternatives.com/site_images/zigzagcutcorners7in.jpg)
23 posted on
01/31/2008 9:37:55 PM PST by
jdm
(A Hunter Thompson ticket would be suicide.)
To: Ol' Sparky
“McCain and Romney are BOTH worse than having Hillary in the White House.”
STRONGLY disagree.
Bubba set us up nicely for 9-11.
Hildabeast could get us nuked!
To: Ol' Sparky
Your sounding like a Democrat troll Sparky.
66 posted on
01/31/2008 9:53:38 PM PST by
rising tide
(Blessed are the poor in spirit: for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.)
To: Ol' Sparky
“McCain and Romney are BOTH worse than having Hillary in the White House.”
Your anti-Mormonism is showing again.
96 posted on
01/31/2008 10:09:39 PM PST by
flaglady47
(The only one that stands between McQueeg and the Presidency is Romney)
To: Ol' Sparky
How many drinks tonight so far?
120 posted on
01/31/2008 10:23:47 PM PST by
ajay_kumar
(United we win, divided democrats win. How difficult is that to understand?)
To: Ol' Sparky
No they are not. Not even close.
209 posted on
02/01/2008 12:00:29 AM PST by
Proud_USA_Republican
(We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good. - Hillary Clinton)
To: Ol' Sparky
“McCain and Romney are BOTH worse than having Hillary in the White House.”
Not on any planet.
To: Ol' Sparky
McCain and Romney are BOTH worse than having Hillary in the White House.
Romney is acceptable. At least he is not stubborn and narcissist as McCain is.
316 posted on
02/01/2008 5:04:15 AM PST by
SeeSalt
To: Ol' Sparky
I am starting to see the brilliance of Hillary or Obama in the WH... but only on one condition: The Republicans in Congress all grow a pair at least the size of Senators Leahy, Levin, Biden, Kennedy(all traitors in my eyes) and stop all “progressive” initiatives and Leftist judge nominations. Unfortunately,the Repubs haven’t learned a thing from the Dems playbook on how to stop a duly elected President virtually dead in his tracks. Read “Shadow Warriors” and weep for your Nation.
To: Ol' Sparky
McCain and Romney are BOTH worse than having Hillary in the White House. I disagree. I don't think there could possibly be anyone worse than Hillary in the WH. I would bring Saddam back from the dead first...
To: Ol' Sparky
Hillary and Obama are both members of what should be called the National Socialist Party. They are both perfectly happy to limit the citizens of this country through abortion. They don’t understand the basis of our constitution and are worse than any Republican. I will never take either Rush or Ann Coulter seriously again. And no one else should either. They are self-promoting phonies who think that the American dream is to make money. Freedom is our first principle and the intrinsic worth of EVERY person. Without that principle we are all just children to be taken care of by elites who have been born to rule.Rush has always presented himself as one who believes in "excellence." What is so excellent about waiting until it is too late to start picking someone who embodies the principles that he proports to promote? He is an elitist entertainer and nothing more. You might as well ask Tom Cruise what he thinks.
367 posted on
02/01/2008 6:19:14 AM PST by
RichardMoore
(Alan Keyes is the only statesman in the race for president)
To: Ol' Sparky
McCain and Romney are BOTH worse than having Hillary in the White House. McAmnisty, Romney, Hillary...what's the difference? They all suck.
GO OBAMA !!! /sarc
374 posted on
02/01/2008 6:30:17 AM PST by
Ouderkirk
(Hillary = Senator Incitatus, Clintigula's whore...er, horse.)
To: Ol' Sparky
McCain and Romney are BOTH worse than having Hillary in the White House.Wow, I sure can't say that. I didn't see any much difference between Hillary and Rudy, but there are some definite differences between McCain or Romney and Hillary. (True, they aren't as conservative as Hunter, but they are far better than Hillary, IMNSHO.)
557 posted on
02/01/2008 10:59:00 AM PST by
MEGoody
(Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
To: Ol' Sparky
I will never agree with you, never!
To: Ol' Sparky
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson