Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US Navy to Test Fire Electric Hypercannon
register.com ^ | 01/30/08 | Unknown

Posted on 01/31/2008 12:59:13 PM PST by Froufrou

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-167 next last
To: Froufrou

Aim it at the U. S. / mexico border.


21 posted on 01/31/2008 1:11:21 PM PST by Mr Apple ( "VIDEO CHINAGATE" http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2970981220206109356)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rick.Donaldson

We have already asserted claim to the entire visible universe and are close to asserting claim to the invisible universe as well.


22 posted on 01/31/2008 1:11:39 PM PST by RightWhale (oil--the world currency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Comment #23 Removed by Moderator

To: catbertz

I’ve always thought, and I’m sure it’s in the works,

that an unmanned fighter/bomber could be run by 3-6 videogame jocks back in a bunker.

It could perform maneuvers that a pilot couldn’t withstand, and not have to employ the weight required to accomodate a pilot.

Plus, you have all of the individuals in charge of different aspects of air battle, each able to concentrate instead of getting distracted by other aspects of battle, and fear of getting tagged.


24 posted on 01/31/2008 1:11:52 PM PST by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Froufrou

I don't imagine this will be quite ready for the first Zumwalt destroyer, but these babies were designed to be able to take advantage of this technology when it does become available.

25 posted on 01/31/2008 1:11:55 PM PST by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hexenhammer

The handheld version’s only drawback is the back-pack sized quick-discharge capacitor. Only weighs in at 500lbs, though.


26 posted on 01/31/2008 1:12:03 PM PST by TheThirdRuffian (Don't blame me; I will write in Thompson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: LambSlave

if I did my math right rather quickly just now, that’s 1.5 miles per second.


27 posted on 01/31/2008 1:12:07 PM PST by Rick.Donaldson (http://www.transasianaxis.com - Visit for lastest on DPRK/Russia/China/Etc --Fred Thompson for Prez.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Dominick; Mr Apple

Yes, but wouldn’t it eliminate fallout?


28 posted on 01/31/2008 1:13:08 PM PST by Froufrou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: MrB
that an unmanned fighter/bomber could be run by 3-6 videogame jocks back in a bunker.

LOL!!!!!!! (yup)
29 posted on 01/31/2008 1:13:36 PM PST by Rick.Donaldson (http://www.transasianaxis.com - Visit for lastest on DPRK/Russia/China/Etc --Fred Thompson for Prez.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Froufrou

Test it on Imanutjob. See if we can shoot a BB up his butt and out his ear.


30 posted on 01/31/2008 1:13:57 PM PST by wolfcreek (The Status Quo Sucks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Froufrou
"80 megawatts "

Imagine the fish you could catch by shocking them with that.

31 posted on 01/31/2008 1:14:18 PM PST by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy; Greg F

WOW! Just look at that! Firing up and over the hill?

This will be a great incentive to get more women to enlist. It’s so far away, it takes out the “ewwww” factor we ladies don’t like.

“Suzy, I didn’t even break a nail!”


32 posted on 01/31/2008 1:14:51 PM PST by Froufrou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: F15Eagle

Given that an anti-matter/matter explosion would probably be in the hundreds of megaton range with a 5 inch shell, it might not be necessary to be too precise with targeting.

Give or take a mile or so would do it for even hard targets, I think.


33 posted on 01/31/2008 1:15:21 PM PST by TheThirdRuffian (Don't blame me; I will write in Thompson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: wolfcreek; DannyTN

~snorrfle!~ I’m loving that!

“Here, mussy, mussy, mussy...”


34 posted on 01/31/2008 1:15:46 PM PST by Froufrou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Froufrou

You’re funny... I like that!


35 posted on 01/31/2008 1:16:06 PM PST by crghill (Christianity...setting women free since 0 a.d.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Dominick

I don’t think it will be “silent”. The amount of electrical energy that is discharged to fire the magnetics will most LIKELY make some powerful popping sounds. And... there will be a sonic boom from the projectile (of course if you heard it, it’s too late for someone already up ahead and they won’t be hearing the projectile at all)


36 posted on 01/31/2008 1:16:16 PM PST by Rick.Donaldson (http://www.transasianaxis.com - Visit for lastest on DPRK/Russia/China/Etc --Fred Thompson for Prez.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
If they can get the air out of the barrel before they fire they can also get some pull along with their poke.

With over ten megajoules behind it, I don't think that the vacuum from a few feet of barrel length would make that much difference overall.

37 posted on 01/31/2008 1:16:22 PM PST by Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Froufrou
The lack of exploding warheads could offer a chance to deliver more surgical strikes, too.

Not really. E=1/2 mass X velocity squared

Expect a 40 foot crater.

The beautiful thing is that the firing ship can carry twice to three times as much ammo in the same space and has no explosive, damage control worries. Well, that and hitting something 200 miles away with a suborbital, guided munition travelling 5-10 times faster than the fastest bullets.

38 posted on 01/31/2008 1:16:37 PM PST by SampleMan (We are a free an industrious people, socialist nannies do not become us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hexenhammer

OK...

F=ma

a = zero to mach 7 divided by time it takes to travel the barrel
m = mass of the projectile

F = tear your shoulder clean off


39 posted on 01/31/2008 1:16:43 PM PST by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Dominick

The laser guns and beam cannons are equally limited by their power source. While a projectile would be far slower than a wavefront, it would be unwise to underestimate kinetic energy.


40 posted on 01/31/2008 1:16:56 PM PST by RightWhale (oil--the world currency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-167 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson