Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

In all due respect!

As I was reading a comment to Pal as I also was reminded as I watch the Video again I was being reminded no matter how one thinks they can be impartial on a subject, when the rubber meets the road and one has to sign their name, than reality sets in and one learns a hard lesson in life.

That it is not about imposing ones own personal views on others, that is it is also the necessary to follow one own conscience and not let those who accuse you to weaken you resolve .

It is clear Romney main objective was to deal with Massachusetts economic woes and you could see the back door slim Tim Russert and his opponent was trying to undermind Romney on the social issues instead of where they knew he was strong on dealing with financial woes where they would lose.

We witness McCain today as he distorts and lays his way to presidency and his soulless minions gather around to promote this charade.

1 posted on 01/30/2008 8:01:52 AM PST by restornu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Abbeville Conservative; ajay_kumar; americanophile; Austin1; bethtopaz; BlueAngel; ...

• Send FReep Mail to Unmarked Package to get [ON] or [OFF] the Mitt Romney Ping List


2 posted on 01/30/2008 8:02:38 AM PST by restornu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: restornu

Trying to remember...

Was he against abortion before he was for it?

Or was he for it before he was against it?


3 posted on 01/30/2008 8:06:00 AM PST by Mr. Brightside
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: restornu

McCain is consistently pro-life on abortion.

Romney becomes pro-life when he plans to run for President.

This is one of many reasons why I’m not sad about yesterday’s result.


4 posted on 01/30/2008 8:07:28 AM PST by The Old Hoosier (Right makes might)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: restornu
Romney has spoken well on this issue. But his decision (plus his lame explanations of his sons lack of military service) has cost him any possibility of winning the election.

Abortion is definitely a problem but so are overpopulation and unwanted pregnancies. Romney, with this veto, has shown himself incapable of exercising good judgement.

Too bad. What started out as one of the most interesting contests in years is deflating rapidly. Edwards and Kucinich on the Left are out, Rudy the fighter is gone, Thompson the honorable and decent guy lacked energy, Ron Paul and Huckabee never had a chance. Suddenly the candidates look very ordinary.

9 posted on 01/30/2008 8:20:48 AM PST by liberallarry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: restornu
Sounds like the Mario Cuomo position. "I'm personally opposed, BUT..."

In other words, the position of cowards, weasels, liars, or panderers. Take your pick.
13 posted on 01/30/2008 8:44:11 AM PST by Antoninus (All you Mittens out there are going to feel like Flippers come November...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: restornu

If Romney was truly pro-life he never would’ve had to explain his veto. The article on the subject would have been. “Governor vetoes contraception bill... As expected, legislature certain to override.

But you keep on pretending that he’s a pro-lifer ; )


16 posted on 01/30/2008 8:56:47 AM PST by American_Centurion (No, I don't trust the government to automatically do the right thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: restornu

I will simply say that I find Romney far more believable on this issue, than I do McClinton on anything.


36 posted on 01/30/2008 1:16:45 PM PST by Gator113 (McCain will lead our country....into the valley of darkness, with Hillary holding our hand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson