Posted on 01/29/2008 11:55:19 AM PST by Sideshow Bob
There have been more than a few recent articles and editorials attempting to affix blame for the demise of the Republican Party. Peggy Noonan blames President Bush. Rush Limbaugh believes a McCain nomination will kill the party. However, even in a worse case scenario, the Republican Party will probably stagger along for several years much like the last decade of the Whigs. Conservative Republicans should probably be more concerned about the impending demise of the conservative movement within the party. Some individuals can be blamed more than others, but this folly has many fathers. The latest blow to conservatives has come from within – thanks to Dr. James Dobson and other egotistical evangelicals. Political doomsayers may be correct and it is likely too late to save the conservative movement in 2008. Conservatives can correct their path to destruction for 2010 and beyond, but only if they look back at recent history, recognize the actions and actors that have brought the party and movement to this point, and to learn from a long series of missteps and mistakes.
Ronald Reagan built a winning coalition of conservatives, independents and establishment moderate Republicans in 1980. A coalition of social, economic and security conservatives had come together to form a plurality within the GOP and wrest leadership of the party from the establishment, moderate GOP. The Iran-Contra scandal (Mistake #1) weakened the coalition and the moderate wing of the party regained control of the GOP (Mistake #2), which led to the election of President George H.W. Bush (Mistake #3).
While the elder Bush had adopted – albeit reluctantly – many conservative ideals, he and the moderate GOP leaders advocated a “kinder, gentler” approach (Mistake #4). Conservatives might have been content to take a back seat to moderate GOP leadership, but they read Bush’s lips and their support and enthusiasm for the Republican Party evaporated after the Bush tax increase (Mistake #5). In 1992 some conservatives were taken in by Ross Perot and his anti-establishment, anti-Washington message (Mistake #6). Others just stayed home (Mistake #7) and helped Democrats elect the Dope from Hope, Bill Clinton, with just 43% of the popular vote (Mistake #8).
The only positive to come out of 1992 was that it helped create an opening for an obscure, but brilliant Congressman from Georgia to lead conservatives to regain control of the Republican Party. Newt Gingrich reformed the three-legged conservative coalition and took an upstart innovative approach of leading the GOP from the House with a 1994 national congressional campaign platform – the Contract with America.
It is important to note that prior to the ’94 elections, Senate Minority Leader Bob Dole and other establishment, moderate GOP leaders scoffed at and were dismissive of Gingrich and the Contract. Dole and Senate moderates rode the Contract’s election coattails, but made it plain that the GOP Senate did NOT sign on to the program, was not obligated to it, reluctantly followed Gingrich's lead, and worked to water down each and every one of the Contract's provisions (Mistake #9).
By January 1996, Dole was the presumptive Republican presidential nominee (Mistake #10). Dole sought to convince Speaker Gingrich to fold up the federal government shutdown stalemate with President Clinton and allow Dole to lead the GOP via his presidential campaign.
Dole gave Gingrich the choice of single-handedly continuing the shutdown and fight with Clinton and the media with Candidate Dole seeking a different path from the House GOP or deferring to Dole's presidential campaign and resuming the conservative battle together with Gingrich’s friend Trent Lott to keep President Dole honest after the ’96 elections. Gingrich made the wrong choice (Mistake #11). Gingrich probably should have run for President himself in 1996 (Mistake #12).
We all remember what happened. By caving in and compromising on the shutdown, the conservative House leadership lost some of their ability to control their more moderate members (Mistake #13). Bob Dole lost (Mistake #14). Trent Lott built his own voice separate from the House (Mistake #15). And with no help from Lott & the GOP Senate and a Clinton veto looming on all conservative issues, Gingrich, Armey & DeLay focused too much of their efforts on the growing Clinton scandals (Mistake #16).
Gingrich was able to maintain order within the House even during the Clinton impeachment. But after the Senate RINOs failed to do their duty and convict Clinton (Mistake #17), the House moderates began feeling their oats (Mistake #18).
Then, the impact of the missing FBI files took effect. Allegations of marital affairs Gingrich and Hyde took their toll (Mistake #19). Seeing his conservative House coalition slowly diminish and Lott's desire to set on a different path, Gingrich stepped down as Speaker (Mistake #20). Then his presumed successor, Bob Livingston from Louisiana, was also taken out by a marital affair (Mistake #21).
House Moderates became emboldened and championed the lackluster Dennis Hastert as Speaker to muzzle Armey & DeLay and appear less confrontational (Mistake #22). This effort also helped to clear the agenda of party leadership for the 2000 GOP presidential candidates (Mistake #23). And in 2000, conservatives settled for the "compassionate conservatism" of George W. Bush (Mistake #24). Many conservatives stayed home, nearly costing Bush the presidency and actually losing GOP control of the Senate in 2000 (Mistake #25).
To be fair, conservatives should thank God everyday for W's leadership in dealing with 9-11. But Bush also squandered the opportunity to push the party and country to the right following that horrible event (Mistake #26). The GOP regained control of the Senate in 2002, but based solely on the country’s fears of Democrats’ inability to deal with national security concerns and not on conservative social and economic principles. Meanwhile, the House drifted further to the center (Mistake #27).
Conservative fears of repeating Florida 2000 helped Bush win reelection in 2004, despite the party's overall drift to the center. By now, any conservative elements in the House and Senate were in complete retreat. The moderates ruled the roost in both houses. RINO defections on the Iraq war (Mistake #28), wasteful earmarks (Mistake #29) and ethics scandals (Mistake #29) were now front and center for the GOP. The only conservative victories of 2005-06 were the confirmations of Roberts and Alito to the Supreme Court. And it took a battle to defeat Bush on his nomination of Harriet Miers to do it.
By Fall 2006 conservatives had become utterly disheartened. Attempts to make the Bush tax cuts permanent stalled (Mistake #30), the continued treachery of Arlen Spector, John McCain, Lindsey Graham and the Gang of 14 (Mistake #31), increased dissatisfaction with George Bush and the Miers nomination debacle all caused conservatives to stay home in November 2006 (Mistake #32). And the GOP lost both the House and Senate.
Occasionally, the conservative movement can still rise up. The reaction to the Amnesty bill was encouraging. But other than that, conservatives have again been wandering in the wilderness. GOP moderates and RINO's have been resistant to allowing a conservative to assume leadership in Congress. And any potential conservative congressional leader has held back (Mistake #33), in part due to the extremely early start of the 2008 presidential race (Mistake #34).
And what did conservatives get for 2008 GOP candidates? Were there any Reagan conservatives who possessed all three legs of the coalition stool - strong national defense, social conservatism, economic conservatism?
Nope.
Instead, we got Rudy Giuliani. An autocrat who has little affection for social conservatives, but pledged to nominate strict construction judges. Whoopee!
Instead, we got John McCain. An angry RINO maverick who enjoys flouting social and economic conservatives AND even the GOP establishment to gain favor and positive reviews from the liberal media.
Instead, we got Mitt Romney, an uber-wealthy GOP establishment moderate. At least Romney panders to social and economic conservatives with recently discovered flip-flopped positions on issues of importance to those two factions.
Instead, we got Mike Huckabee – the Dope from Hope, part II. While he is just as slick and manipulative as Bill Clinton, Huckabee is nowhere near as smart.
Instead, we got Ron Paul, a true blue, libertarian nutbag. Paul has a few economic bona fides that have pulled away a few non-nut job libertarians. But I'm sorry, Dr. Paul is a kook.
Instead, we got the Obscure Four - Tom Tancredo, Alan Keyes, Tommy Thompson & Duncan Hunter. Tancredo & Keyes are single issue candidates. Tommy & Dunc are well-rounded politicians (especially Hunter), but they lacked the ability to have broad nationwide appeal.
Seeing this morass of blech, Fred Thompson entered the fray expecting to be the savior of the Republican Party and the conservative movement. Fred should have been that candidate.
Unfortunately, Dr. James Dobson and a few evangelical leaders decided to cut off their nose to spite their face (Mistake #35). You see, Fred's not a Bible thumper. Neither was Ronald Reagan. And like Reagan, Fred is a bona fide, all-around, federalist conservative. That wasn’t good enough for Dobson. And when Fred refused to kiss Dobson's ring of evangelical purity, Dobson went shopping for a candidate he thought he could control.
Flim Flam Huckabee seized on that opportunity. Huckabee played Dobson into thinking that Dobson could be a GOP kingmaker (Mistake #36). A handful of evangelical leaders blindly pushed Huckabee as a viable conservative (Mistake #37). The media, who knows a GOP loser when they see one, helped fan the flames of Huckabee's support. For a time, the scheme worked. Huckabee won Iowa (Mistake #38), but eventually the truth of Huckabee's Christian Socialism became evident to most conservatives.
But the damage had been done. Social conservatives were now spilt. Some had been taken in by Huckabee's class warfare (Mistake #39). Some had been taken in by the media's false depiction of Fred as a lazy campaigner (Mistake #40) and settled for Romney, Rudy or, worse, McCain (Mistake #41).
Added into this deceptive mix was the ability of independents and Democrats to participate in and distort the Iowa, New Hampshire & South Carolina Republican primaries (Mistake #42). Media darling McCain was back! McCain – the new Comeback Kid – was ready to lead....the GOP down to defeat. Meanwhile, Fred's race and the ability for the GOP to unify behind a Reaganesque conservative died (Mistake #43).
At best, the GOP could still end up with a George W. Bush-lite nominee like Mitt Romney. He will at least pretend to care about conservative ideals from his Country Club wing of the party.
At worst, the GOP could end up with John McCain. McCain, the perennial thorn in the GOP's side who was once touted as a possible VP running mate for John Kerry!
Who knows? It’s still remotely possible that none of the moderates and RINO’s still in the presidential race will win a majority of the primary delegates. Maybe a conservative nominee could still rise up in a brokered GOP convention. Maybe a conservative national congressional campaign like the Contract with America could still arise in time for the 2008 elections. But really, that’s a fantasy.
The reality is that conservatives will have to wait until 2010 or 2012 to reassert itself as the true and legitimate leaders of the Republican Party. The reality is that conservatives have allowed numerous people to make numerous mistakes which have led the movement to this precarious point. The reality is that conservatives and the GOP are now left with this Dobson's Choice of Romney or McCain. Pass the nose clips and prepare for the worst.
You really don't know, do you? How embarrassing for you. Bein' a Western man, I would not technically be an authority. I'll leave it to Theophilus to clue you in, if he so desires.
Oops, PING to #441
1) what all evangelicals believe
2) what all Christinas believe
3) what all conservatives believe
4) what all southerners believe
Thanks, this has been fun navigating through your pretzel logic.
The folly in your remarks is that the predictions offered days into Thompson's campaign have come true, and to a "T". The numbers lay the facts bare.
Your intemperate bleating would be well served by some education before attempting to provide analysis.
You've a bit of luck in that regard. Your ignorance can be overcome, or at least one could hope.
Well, now I'm insulted. Lectured on ignorance by a Keyes supporter!
Your repeated barbs lead me to ask, what paragon of conservatism are you supporting? It's alright if you don't want to answer... Any candidate other than Keyes might be a source of embarrassment, and I can understand that.
Um...hello?!!
Remember, my original vanity was a lament that there isn't one right now.
Y'know...we've sort of been talking about that whole Dobson's Choice thing...
...sticking conservatives with the unsavory choice of Mitt Romney (Bush-lite) or (shudder) Juan McCain. Does that ring any bells?
Just so you're clear on this. I'll tell you that I could reluctantly hold my nose and vote for Romney.
I distrust Mitt only slightly less than Huckabee on their flip-flopped conservative issue conversions, but believe Mitt does have a remote chance of winning in November. Every other GOP candidate will get smoked by Hilary or Obama. And every other GOP candidate will have a worse drag down effect on GOP congressional efforts. A McCain nomination would have the biggest negative impact on the GOP.
But...
I won't send Mitt any money.
I won't put up Mitt yard signs or bumper stickers.
I won't volunteer to help Mitt's campaign.
And I won't post on FR in support of Romney (although I will likely post MANY, MANY things in opposition to McCain!)
And if the GOP nominee is McCain, I intend to vote 3rd party or write-in (probably Fred).
But there is. Dr. Alan Keyes.
All rancor aside, I would realy like to figure this part out:
You would bust my balls for voting for Keyes, a man who is inarguably the single Conservative in the race and whose Conservative credentials are impeccable.
At the very same time, as you lament that there is no Conservative (a position rendered false by way of Keyes) you feel capable of pulling the lever for a gun grabbing, baby killing, big govt. Northeastern RINO.
WTF, over?
BTW, Romney and McCain will have the same problem as Thompson did. Neither can secure the Christians. Without the Christians there will be no win.
But if you must know, I find Keyes to be a shrill, single-issue, grandstanding non-candidate and believe he "entered" the race solely for his own personal financial benefit. To his credit, he is a passionate opponent of abortion, but nothing more.
As for voting for Romney, I want my vote to matter. As I described, only Romney has a chance (albeit small) at winning in November. If Romney isn't the nominee, my vote won't matter and I can vote my conscience with a 3rd party or write-in vote.
Sideshow, you are engaging in identity politics again. The long locked hippies: Skynyrd did not represent Southerners, but their song reflected the pride that all Southerners have in what they are, what they believe and where they come from, warts and all.
If you tell us a poor Southern Governor named: "Huckabee" cannot win because of what he is, what he believes and where he comes from, we'll rally around him. We love any fight, especially a "Lost Cause". Just watch what happens on Super Tuesday. I'm not saying the Huckabee will come out on top, but the South will be heard from. Myth is a Yankee. He's not a Christian and he's not a gentleman. Thompson is a gentleman but that's not enough.
Bob didn't say he couldn't win because of what he "is" or where he comes from. In fact, it was another poster who proclaimed that the anti-Huckabee are really just Northeastern Rockefeller Republicans. While Fredheads may be slow to realize that they lost because Fred mishandled the situation with the Christian voters who vote en block, the Huckabites are more slow to realize that he cannot win without convincing Republicans that all of his liberal acts as governor aren't indicative of who he'll be as President. Not an easy sell. Socons need ficons and vice versa. Just because a guy says "RLA" doesn't make him a conservative at large. Nor does it make him a viable candidate (and I don't mean viable in the sense of "electability" which Huck clearly has about a -23 on a scale of 1 to 10 in electability).
I previousy addressed why most conservatives are opposed to Huckabee. And I disposed of the inane Yankee bias argument.
As a child of immigrants and as a first-generation American, I find that entire fixation of North vs. South to be rather silly. The Civil War (or am I a bigot if I don't call it the War of Northern Aggression?) ended 143 years ago, please let it go.
You are right.
ROFL!
what’s even sillier is I am neither a Dobson nor Huckabee supporter but the inherent bias some supporters have against them for their own private reasons rankles me
plus it’s ok in their world to stereotype Huckabee but they would be the first to race bait were one to do that with Obama ...
actually one needn’t go that far....I bet I can find at least one of these clowns (wonder if they really were Clowns...that was one of their signatures too....anti-Christian conservative) smearing Huckabee as an anti-Mormon bigot
if I had time I’d look.....Sideshow with his evermore apparently vain vanity has already demonstrated his prejudice on this thread over and over...
some FReepers are just asshats.....politics is secondary
No, you're just the moron who keeps re-inserting the Southern/Christian/evangelical bias bilge.
Your bias has already ben posted upthread for everyone to see.
Deny that.
My Ego and yer wuttle vanity.
Same here.
You should know who he is, as there is only one conservative in the race.
There is only one candidate who has all the issues down cold.
We are in a war with the enemies of the Constitution and the citizens of this great country, only most Americans don't realize it.
There is only one candidate who actually knows who our enemies are, and knowing who the enemy is is imperative in order to win.
Huh? Keyes is fairly conservative, and I was a supporter of his once, but this time we have Ron Paul, who is more conservative than Keyes.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.