Posted on 01/28/2008 12:07:29 PM PST by NormsRevenge
WASHINGTON - On Monday evening, President Bush will stand before a joint session of Congress and give a speech about the state of the Union – and perhaps about the state of his place in history, as well.
This doesn't mean that Mr. Bush's final State of the Union address will be a nostalgia-fest of retrospection. Bush, like his father before him, famously is averse to dwelling on the past.
But he's unlikely to unveil bold new initiatives, say experts, given his low approval ratings and the lack of time left in his term. At best Bush might push items already in the legislative pipeline, such as a revised No Child Left Behind education law, while claiming progress in Iraq and the war on terror – the most consequential events of his administration.
"Given his political situation, the task is to make the best case for his legacy rather than to set an ambitious agenda for his last year," says Thomas Mann, senior fellow in governance studies at the Brookings Institution, a Washington think tank.
Administration officials insist that Bush's speech will be focused on the future. Twelve months is enough time to get some things done in politics, and Bush has often expressed a desire to "sprint to the finish," said White House spokeswoman Dana Perino on Jan. 25.
Bush will highlight items of unfinished business that he believes should be priorities for the Democratic congressional leadership, said Ms. Perino.
These include the economic stimulus package, an item on which Bush has reached a quick accord with House Democrats, and updated warrantless eavesdropping legislation, a bill that's been the subject of heated partisan fights.
Bush will also mention some actions that he can take without congressional approval, via executive orders or other administrative action, spokeswoman Perino said.
President Bill Clinton often promoted such small-bore steps as a means of appearing dynamic despite facing a Congress controlled by the political opposition.
Notably absent from the speech will be the unveiling of new initiatives on immigration or Social Security reform, or similar big problems. Perino blamed the likelihood of congressional inaction for this omission – not waning political strength or the shortness of Bush's remaining time in the Oval Office.
On foreign affairs, Bush will highlight recent successes in Iraq, according to White House officials, and talk about the fact that US troops levels there will soon start to decline. He'll discuss the Middle East peace process and the prospect of Israeli-Palestinian reconciliation, and work in mentions of US aid in the fight against global hunger and disease.
"He's put all of his soul and all of his might into being president, and this year will be no exception," said Perino.
That might be one of the points of this year's State of the Union – the beginning of a push to present his overall effort as president in positive terms.
After all, few people still are looking to Bush for political leadership, says George Edwards III, a presidential scholar at Texas A&M University. Only about one-third of the country approves of his job performance. A majority of Americans believe that beginning the war in Iraq was a mistake, according to many polls. Many voters have tuned out the White House to focus on the contenders for the 2008 presidential election, Dr. Edwards says.
"He's got very little political capital," says Edwards of Bush.
Thus this final State of the Union may be one of the chief executive's last chances to argue his case before the nation. He will likely present the recent decline in violence in Baghdad as evidence that he will pass an improving situation in Iraq along to his successor. He might hold up his stimulus deal with the House as an example of how he has worked to keep the economy humming along.
"To try to begin to set the rhetorical terms for judging his presidency in the years ahead – that's what [the State of the Union] may be about more than anything else," says Mr. Mann of the Brookings Institution.
Not that Democrats will allow these assertions to remain unchallenged. Democratic congressional leaders last week produced what they called a "pre-buttal" to the State of Union, in which, among other things, they challenged the president to renounce the use of waterboarding during interrogations and to close the Guantánamo Bay prison for detainees.
"Our first goal as a country must be to restore . . . moral authority," said Senate majority leader Harry Reid (D) of Nevada.
Bush is certain to argue otherwise. A president's early State of the Union addresses are usually used to present grand plans; his middle ones, to support his agenda and subtly attack opponents. But nearing the end of their time in office, presidents cannot avoid being retrospective, in addition to forward-looking, says Southern Methodist University professor of political science Cal Jillson.
"I do think he will argue for sustaining much of his earlier policymaking," says Dr. Jillson.
In before illegal immigration!
No, you brought up his legacy. Thank you.
Beat you to it . . . LOL.
That was funny. You take care.
Wonder if Jorge th Mexican will give any part of his speech in English, just to throw a bone to the Gringos, or will it all be in his native tongue.
Bush’s place in history will be defined by “No further attacks on American Soil”, during his watch. When you think of how hard that was to prevent considering the MSM and the Leftists in the government it is a pretty substantial legacy, especially compared to a stained blue dress.
I’d like to hear him say he will sign an executive order allowing for oil drilling on fed lands and off shore. I fear however he will say we must use something not invented yet.
I wonder how that works with cancer drugs. Yes, I know we have plenty of this but, someone needs to invent something better so you cannot have this.
His legacy is one endless massive attack on American soil.
He only fought back against one attack.
The rest he’s surrendered to.
“His legacy is one endless massive attack on American soil.”
This is a good point. There were no illegal aliens before Bush. And there would be none now, if America had only elected Kerry or Gore./s
Jorge’s Spanish is better than his English.
And Mark Levin just announced that al jazeera news is being given front and center seats.
:Q
And Mark Levin just announced that al jazeera news is being given front and center seats.
—
Now why should we CAIR?
Is Grover Norquist sitting near them? :-}
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.