Posted on 01/23/2008 9:04:57 PM PST by kellynla
Talk radio, the powerhouse conservative media, appears to be "missing in action" when it comes to the Republican primary this year.
Rush Limbaugh, the nation's leading talker, startled his audience this past Monday by announcing he just may not bother backing the GOP nominee this year.
Limbaugh told his audience, "I can see possibly not supporting the Republican nominee this election, and I never thought that I would say that in my life."
Limbaugh's reason: “You don’t have a genuine down-the-list conservative” among the GOP candidates.
For example, John McCain has long been in Rush's sights because of his maverick backing of liberal positions like campaign finance reform.
A number of the nation’s leading conservative hosts seem to feel the same.
Mike Reagan, who played a big role in helping the GOP win back Congress in 1994, is agnostic this time around.
He tells Newsmax, "I will follow in my father's footsteps and remain uncommitted for the primaries." But unlike Rush, he says, he will back the Republican nominee whomever he is.
Michael Savage, the nation's third-largest syndicated host, says he has not endorsed any candidate "at this time."
Talkers Magazine reports that Mike Gallagher is the sixth most listened-to talk-radio host in America with over 3.75 million weekly listeners in top 10 markets like Los Angeles, Chicago, Dallas, Boston, Houston, and Philadelphia, as well as cities all over the country, and is the eighth most recognized talk-radio host.
He says, "I definitely dislike Huckabee. He is very much a fiscal liberal, wrong on illegal immigration, and he loves big government." But Gallagher, again, doesn't have one candidate he's backing.
Ditto Glenn Beck.
Beck tells Newsmax he hasn't yet endorsed a candidate and probably won't. "If I can't figure it out with a nonstop 24-hour-a-day news cycle for over a year, maybe I never will. Plus, people care more about Hannah Montana's endorsement than they do mine anyway."
He adds that he is not leaning in the direction of any candidate. "I’m leaning away from more people than I’m leaning towards. The climate of Washington frustrates me so much, I feel like I'm turning into Seinfeld looking for a date."
Beck does say he has warm feeling for Rudy Giuliani and Mitt Romney, adding that each have parts that interest him. He adds, like Rush, that none of the GOP candidates are complete conservatives.
Libertarian conservative Neal Boortz, who has over 6 million listeners on some 250 radio stations, says he's leaning toward Mike Huckabee. Boortz, a pro-choice libertarian, dislikes Huckabee's anti-abortion stand, but really likes Huckabee's Fair Tax program, one that Boortz advocated in a New York Times best-selling book.
So why the general malaise among America's leading hard-hitting hosts?
Several factors may be at work.
In the post-Reagan era, no candidate seems to grab the Reagan mantle and wear it well. All the GOP contenders appear to have warts, and can't seem to lasso the base of the GOP: fiscal conservatives, social conservatives and foreign policy hawks.
But even if the hosts were to move behind a candidate, it's doubtful they could make a big difference this time.
Several of the leading hosts, led by Rush, have gone on all-out attacks against McCain. But being simply anti-campaign without a GOP candidate as an alternative has not hurt McCain, who has recaptured the front-runner status he lost well over a year ago.
Talk radio is also under siege. Audience numbers for many shows are way down, and once-fanatic listeners are going to the Web for news and views — sites like Newsmax — or tuning to cable news shows like Fox, or even switching to satellite radio like XM and Sirius, which don't carry many of the top-talk hosts.
The big question is the role the hosts will play in the general election, especially if Hillary Clinton, one of the great punching bags of the right, will be the Democratic nominee.
Dick Cheney, the only national figure more despised than Hillary Clinton...by DOUBLE. That’s a plan.
Won’t happen, Kelly
I’ve been PRAYING for Cheney to run for 15 years!!
Mark Sanford for President at a brokured convention??
Someone gave a persuasive argument that burst my brokered convention bubble today. With his edge in party hacks, McCain is the most likely beneficiary of a brokered convention.
true darn it.... wheres my strawberries??
Rudy should know....Rush is always right, Glen Beck is a Mormon, and talk radio lives on. Rudy obviously never listens to Rush as each time I hear him (not often) he is explaining why he does not endorse in primaries.
Rudy must be one of those Bill Kristol/left wing of the republican party guys.
I have just about come to the conclusion that the R’s need to, just as 06, get their butts handed to them. They did not listen to their conservative base in 06 and they are not listening now. Maybe a resounding and utter humiliating defeat in 08 can get them back on the right track and we can just hope and pray that President Hillary Clinton will not screw up much in 4 years.
We truly do not have a “real” Republican this year to vote for. GWB really had a golden opportunity, but instead, put us in the gutter to argue with the dems over how:
1. not to call it amnesty.
2. to fight a war to lose.
3. sure, I will sign that SPENDING bill
4. just doing jobs Americans won’t do
5. let them thar Mescun trucks roll
6. let’s go beg for cheaper oil
7. aw hell, let’s pay for the ole folks pills
8. social security, heck, let the kids pay for us
9. mortgage crisis, move over, we’ll help pay
10. Ben!!!!! Get that chopper warmed up
If Dick Cheney wins it all the way, his VP will be literally one heart beat away from becoming president.
Michael Medved has been decrying the position of conservative talk radio hosts and today tried to claim that Michael Reagan supported John McCain just like Ron Reagan Jr. has had good things to say about McCain.
There is a rift within the party Rockefellers and conservatives. Turning to the Left (it goes BEYOND any MIDDLE) turns off the conservative base. They will continue to lose power until they realize that we oppose their agenda. OPPOSE their agenda. Socialism is socialism. Open borders is open borders. Amnesty is amnesty.
Rush has never seriously endorsed a candidate in a Republican primary, why is anyone surprised he didn’t do it this year? Maybe he was counting on Republicans who have been claiming they want a solid conservative nominee to actually vote for one. Unfortunately, that didn’t happen.
Well, with the current slate there really isn’t anyone to get behind.
I fear that the GOP will lose big this year, but I know that if that happens they will go the other way.
They won’t try to become conservative, they will run more to the left since that is what “won”. And if by some chance the GOP wins this year, they will run further to the left next election for the same reason.
What a moron! Ruddy is just jealous....
Rush, Savage, MIA!????
they are there every day talking about this....
Ruddy is irrelavent.
yup.
If that is the case then Ross Perot’s third party in 92 will be a precurser to a really serious third party. The conservatives are not dead and are tired of getting pee’d on. We will look to or establish a conservative party.
Some will say “why waste your vote”? What will be the difference than what we have done now?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.