Shades of North Korea ~ The State Department just never learns!!
1 posted on
01/23/2008 10:24:24 AM PST by
cowdog77
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
To: cowdog77
“The State Department just never learns!!”
Come on another Daft UN resolution? Gotta be good, maybe we can use it in our next ‘authorization of force’ declaration.
2 posted on
01/23/2008 10:26:56 AM PST by
CJ Wolf
(To Join or leave the offical Ron Paul 'let freedom' Ping, Freepmail me.)
To: cowdog77
In some strange fashion, I almost wish that the Iranians would light a test nuke off in their desert just to prove to Condi and her State Department minions exactly how stupid they have been in dealing with both the mullahs and North Koreans.
3 posted on
01/23/2008 10:27:49 AM PST by
Virginia Ridgerunner
(“We must not forget that there is a war on and our troops are in the thick of it!” --Duncan Hunter)
To: cowdog77
5 posted on
01/23/2008 10:28:39 AM PST by
BigFinn
To: cowdog77
I’m sure she’s just obeying her orders.
6 posted on
01/23/2008 10:33:22 AM PST by
stuartcr
(Election year.....Who we gonna hate, in '08?)
To: cowdog77
Go get ‘em Jorge. Fight that WOT, and the war on drugs, and the war on American citizens, and the war on the conservatives, and the ...
8 posted on
01/23/2008 10:36:14 AM PST by
G.Mason
(And what is intelligence if not the craft of out-thinking our adversaries?)
To: cowdog77
Agreed. Does anyone really think they will truly give up their quest? I think this would just push it further underground... Shades of N. Korea is right! UGH...
9 posted on
01/23/2008 10:36:59 AM PST by
LibertyRocks
("Islam - The Religion of Pieces" -- quote from LR's "Infidel & Proud" Daughter)
To: cowdog77
Yesterday, the state department spokesman note the North Korean 6 country discussions were in complete breakdown.
They give billions of our dollars away for nothing and it is exactly what we get.
10 posted on
01/23/2008 10:41:49 AM PST by
edcoil
To: cowdog77
Bring Ahmadinejad and the mad mullahs an autographed basketball and a bottle of Pierre Jouet. They’ll forget all about the 12th Imam and their dreams of a caliphate.
To: cowdog77
14 posted on
01/23/2008 10:48:13 AM PST by
rjp2005
(Lord have mercy on us)
To: cowdog77
The U.N.’s top humanitarian affairs official, John Holmes, rebuked Israel for meting out collective punishment and Condoleezza Rice urged Israeli leaders to avert a humanitarian crisis. She did not repeat her “failure is not an option” mantra. Perhaps that’s better left for a bumper sticker, along with “Rice go home.”
16 posted on
01/23/2008 10:49:56 AM PST by
cowdog77
(Circle the Wagons)
To: cowdog77
(finally... a new "Breaking News" story)
17 posted on
01/23/2008 10:51:14 AM PST by
kinsman redeemer
(The real enemy seeks to devour what is good.)
To: cowdog77
I get a horrible vision of Rice visiting Tehran like Albright’s fiasco in Pyongyang.
18 posted on
01/23/2008 10:52:00 AM PST by
AU72
To: cowdog77
Didn’t the Shah of Iran send Lazlo Toth/aka Fr. Guido Sarducci a nice tie in the 1970s?
19 posted on
01/23/2008 10:55:49 AM PST by
weegee
(Those who surrender personal liberty to lower global temperatures will receive neither.)
To: cowdog77
Great idea. We normalize relations with Iran. Just as soon as (1) our embassy is rebuilt, (2) the people kidnapped and held for 444 days are paid reparations, (3) the parties responsible including Mahmoud Ahmadinejad are imprisoned for breaking Iranian and international law in the matter, (4) the sitting government issues a public apology for the outrageous and illegal violation of U.S. property and people there, and (5) the survivors and heirs of Iranian-sponsored terrorism such as the Marine barracks bombing in Beirut are properly compensated and the instigators brought to justice.
Until then no deal.
To: cowdog77
new world order i guess, condi.
22 posted on
01/23/2008 11:03:39 AM PST by
sappy
To: cowdog77
This is simply a reiteration of our current and only public policy.
It was prompted by the recent butt whooping that the real power in Iran gave to president Amanutjob.
It will likely be ignored by Iran's High Council, but the true audience was the Iranian people.
IMO, this is a good policy.
23 posted on
01/23/2008 11:06:34 AM PST by
Cold Heat
(Mitt....2008)
To: cowdog77
Diplomats always believe everything can be resolved through negotiations: meetings, meetings, more meeting, a press statement, and still more meetings. For the State Department mind, there is no difference between inertia and resolution. Fanatics taking action to bring about the things that they say and believe is just too crude and unwashed. Besides, they never get invited to Davos to sit on a self-important panel to discuss important global events.
24 posted on
01/23/2008 11:08:10 AM PST by
mojito
To: cowdog77
"Rice Offers Iran Prospect of Normal Ties"
yeah, ok, that would be ok for the Iranians, but we should be sticking with using
since it's much less likely we could get strangled with a clip on!
To: cowdog77
“Rice said this new relationship could be defined not by fear and mistrust but growing cooperation, expanding trade and exchange, and the peaceful resolution of differences.”
Would the Iranians and their proxies stop killing/helping to kill our soliders in Iraq and elsewhere in the Middle East? You should add it to your daydream list, Condi.
28 posted on
01/23/2008 11:18:26 AM PST by
Cecily
To: cowdog77
29 posted on
01/23/2008 11:19:28 AM PST by
Blogatron
(Taste napalm and die!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson