Posted on 01/23/2008 7:49:01 AM PST by rface
So far, Mitt Romney is winning overwhelming support, according to a poll at FreeRepublic.com, which had been a place where Fred Thompson's supporters congregated.
(Excerpt) Read more at video1.washingtontimes.com ...
Since the candidates left are mods and libs
Do a write in for your primaries and have a brokered convention.
That is the way they use to be until the media started picking our candidates.
The most amazing result of the current polling is that “Anyone but Mitt” finished last with only 14 Freepers and 7 non-members taking that stand. There’s a lot of anti-Mitt postings on this board for so few votes. All I can guess is that many anti-Mitt types must also be anti-some one else and thus chose “None of the above” as the energy they display makes it unlikely they’d pass on voting here.
Fredheads could help to
Re-draft Duncan Hunter into the Presidential Race
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1958247/posts
I will never vote for anyone who is not strong on defense or fighting our enemies. Dr. Paul is neither.
Yeah, maybe, but he’s there ~ and on time too!
Romney is purty and has a big fat wallet. He's dreamy, dontcha know.
Considering what happened to the last guy we “all supported”...
does anyone really CARE????
Fred was clearly the best choice.. for most of us.
But not for enough of those people actually voting for him in the primaries.
Alan Keyes.
It was a blast to play. Of course, I had to use lots of nuclear weapons in-country to win, the radioactive cleanup took me the remainder of the game and beyond.
I guess will need a lot of mops....
If you once were for abortion you can NEVER EVER change?
Bull shiite! Do any of you anti Mitt people believe he will appoint a judge that is in favor? This is a northeat thing people. In America above the Mason Dixon Line you can only be just so Republican and win. Below you can only be just so rat and win. While there are exceptions that’s general rule. This does mean that Mitt will give us another ruth buzzi ginsberg.
Nobody is buying your lies and distortions. How many times do you have to be told that?
I’m not going anywhere until I vote. I say keep them guessing and working for my vote. And, after the candidate is chosen, I will not be working for him. I will simply be working against the other side. Same as in ‘04.
Don’t believe everything you read.
Who is “our?”
It’s time for more restaurant choices.
Don’t believe everything you read. I happen to know firsthand that there were moles in FRed’s staff trying to undermine his campaign.
That’s where all these false rumors were coming from.
I believe the title of the thread has Fred’s name in it.
Do a write in for your primaries and have a brokered convention.I'm with you as far as the brokered convention, but there's another way to get there besides a write-in campaign, and that's by spreading the delegates around among various candidates. Since Mitt is presently the leader and seems likely to gain the most from Fred's having dropped out, that means voting for a candidate other than Mitt who has a real shot at denying him a particular state's delegates but no shot at all of winning the delegates needed to secure the nomination prior to the convention.
In my state, New York, that would mean Rudy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.