Skip to comments.
Unintended Consequences - The Case of the Red-Cockaded Woodpecker
NY Times ^
| January 20, 2008
| STEPHEN J. DUBNER and STEVEN D. LEVITT
Posted on 01/20/2008 3:14:48 PM PST by neverdem
Freakonomics
One year from today, a new president moves into the White House. This president will be eager to carry out any number of plans including, surely, plans to help the segments of society that most need help. Extending a helping hand, after all, is one of the great privileges and responsibilities of the presidency.
But before charging ahead with such plans, the new president might do well to first ask him- or herself the following question: What do a deaf woman in Los Angeles, a first-century Jewish sandal maker and a red-cockaded woodpecker have in common?
A few months ago, a prospective patient called the office of Andrew Brooks, a top-ranked orthopedic surgeon in Los Angeles. She was having serious knee trouble, and she was also deaf. She wanted to know if her deafness posed a problem for Brooks. He had his assistant relay a message: no, of course not; he could easily discuss her situation using knee models, anatomical charts and written notes.
The woman later called again to say she would rather have a sign-language interpreter. Fine, Brooks said, and asked his assistant to make the arrangements. As it turned out, an interpreter would cost $120 an hour, with a two-hour minimum, and the expense wasnt covered by insurance. Brooks didnt think it made sense for him to pay. That would mean laying out $240 to conduct an exam for which the womans insurance company would pay him $58 a loss of more than $180 even before accounting for taxes and overhead.
So Brooks suggested to the patient that they make do without the interpreter. Thats when she told him that the Americans With Disabilities Act (A.D.A.) allowed a patient to choose the mode of interpretation, at the physicians expense. Brooks, flabbergasted, researched...
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: ada; deaf; disabilities; esa
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-32 last
To: papasmurf
I think the woodpecker situation is a metaphor for what always happens to collectivist governments that refuse to recognize that people act in their own self interest. Individuals have always been unwilling accept unequal economic burdens and loss for ‘common goods’. It remains the genius of Capitalism to recognize self interest and make it work for society.
To: Old North State
I see it as that, also. Thanks.
22
posted on
01/20/2008 9:48:32 PM PST
by
papasmurf
(I'm voting for FRed, even if I have to write him in.)
To: neverdem
Let’s not get too far down the thread before remembering that the ADA was signed into law by GHW Bush and there lies the lesson — an R after a candidate’s name has little to do with overall political philosophy. Just something to think about during this political season that is filled with R-Nannystate candidates of all stripes.
23
posted on
01/21/2008 2:30:05 AM PST
by
T-Bird45
(It feels like the seventies, and it shouldn't.)
To: neverdem
They all said, If I ever get a call from someone like that, Ill never see her, he says.Taxation without representation comes to mind.
People WILL find a way to avoid unreasonable demands put upon them!
24
posted on
01/21/2008 5:39:49 AM PST
by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
To: T-Bird45
Thank you, I was thinking the same thing.
25
posted on
02/16/2008 8:34:06 AM PST
by
Balding_Eagle
(If America falls, darkness will cover the face of the earth for a thousand years.)
To: neverdem; Timesink; martin_fierro; reformed_democrat; Loyalist; =Intervention=; PianoMan; GOPJ; ...
I'm almost speechless. Heads will roll at the Times! Or maybe it's been seven years since the Times last reported a common sense article and the editors are/were on sabbatical??? Or maybe they thought their hit counter was stuck and wanted to give it a proper test.
Apologies for duplicate pings.
26
posted on
02/16/2008 9:03:04 AM PST
by
ForGod'sSake
(ABCNNBCBS: An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.)
To: neverdem
The New York Times ??? OMG it looks like a liberal brain has trumped liberal "feelings". Is it possible?
If a liberal can understand unintended consequences, surely pigs are flying.
27
posted on
02/16/2008 9:33:24 AM PST
by
GOPJ
(Take your ball - go home - sit this one out? Fifty years of liberal Supreme Court decisions? NO WAY.)
To: ForGod'sSake
28
posted on
02/16/2008 7:12:17 PM PST
by
GOPJ
(Take your ball - go home - sit this one out? Fifty years of liberal Supreme Court decisions? NO WAY.)
To: GOPJ
29
posted on
02/16/2008 9:04:49 PM PST
by
ForGod'sSake
(ABCNNBCBS: An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.)
To: srmorton
30
posted on
02/17/2008 10:24:43 AM PST
by
GOPJ
(Obama didn't get one counted vote in Harlem's 94th. Not one. Will Texas and Ohio cheat next?)
To: neverdem
Rush-is-talking-about-this-now bump...
31
posted on
06/11/2008 9:13:42 AM PDT
by
null and void
(Bureaucracies are stupid. They grow larger by the square of their age and stupider by its cube.)
To: neverdem
As true today as it was when printed... is this the last good article to come out of the New York Times?
32
posted on
01/01/2018 9:21:21 PM PST
by
GOPJ
(Intelligence services coup failed. Robert Hanssen (American traitor) to get new roommates soon.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-32 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson