FRED VETS, SIGN UP TODAY AT: 
Posted on 01/20/2008 10:37:03 AM PST by jdm
The South Carolina primary turned out to be a clarifying event after all. Instead of the potential for five front-runners in the Super Tuesday contest in two weeks, it appears we will have at best three viable candidates for the nomination, and only if Rudy Giuliani proves his strategy correct by winning Florida. What will be left will be the three candidates that the conservative blogosphere has relentlessly criticized for their lack of lifelong fealty to the Ronald Reagan legacy, but whom voters have nevertheless trusted enough to support in the primaries.
First, the failure of Mike Huckabee and Fred Thompson to win in South Carolina signals the end of their campaigns, whether they recognize it or not, especially for Fred. He made South Carolina his explicit firewall, the place where he had to have a great showing in order to retain credibility as a candidate. A third-place finish among one of the most conservative groups of voters in the primaries does not bode well, nor does the fact that he actually placed fourthamong self-professed conservatives in the CNN exit polls. He became the first "front-runner" to fail to win a must-win contest, and he will likely withdraw sooner rather than later.
Huckabee's dream took a beating last night. The Arkansas governor should have won the first Southern primary, especially given the high numbers of evangelicals turning out for the election. He took 43% of them, but McCain got 27% to mostly negate Huckabee's big advantage. His populist rhetoric ran out of steam in the Palmetto State, and although he made it close, he failed to convert. And if Huckabee can't win in South Carolina, where else can he win? What is his path to the nomination? Without the kind of name recognition that McCain has or the money that Romney and Giuliani can command, he's probably reached the end of the line as well. He'll stay in the race and collect delegates from proportional contests, but he won't win a significant state.
That leaves Romney and McCain, and possibly Giuliani. Rudy needs Florida to keep the delegate gap from getting too large and to maintain credibility in the large coastal states that could carry him to the nomination. All three of these candidates have significant issues with the party's base, McCain most of all -- and yet these are the three left standing as the smoke begins to clear.
My e-mail sounds the frustration of this situation. Messages and comments on the blog have become filled with declarations of sitting on hands, the destruction of the party, and so on. However, the plain fact is that the actual party -- the people voting for the candidates -- have made it clear that they have a high level of comfort with Romney and McCain, and potentially Rudy as well.
I'm actually a lot more optimistic than most about the result. If these three contend for the nomination, we have two candidates who employed conservative principles in very liberal settings as executives and showed remarkable success, and a Senator who at least understands the nature of the conflict of this age and knows how to fight it. All of them have more applicable experience than any of the Democratic candidates, and perhaps more than all three of them combined.
Rather than focus on the negatives, the Republicans still left to vote should focus on the positives. Which of these three can lead this nation in war, can implement conservative policies on economics and foreign policy, and work to reduce spending and taxes in meaningful ways that expands liberty rather than constraining it? Which of them have actually done this successfully, and which can use that experience in a general election to beat either Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama?
From where I sit, I'd say we have good candidates, any of which are easily supportable by Republicans in a general election. Instead of declaring that the sky is falling, let's keep our eyes on the prize. These are the candidates that have resonated with the voters, and so these are the choices. The party only disintegrates if we keep wishing for a resurrection of Ronald Reagan rather than working pragmatically to find the best in what we have.
America Lives, She Breathes and Waves her Hand...And She (the lady) isn't holding threes. God Bless the U.S.A.
From where I sit, I'd say we have good candidates, any of which are easily supportable by Republicans in a general election. Instead of declaring that the sky is falling, let's keep our eyes on the prize. These are the candidates that have resonated with the voters, and so these are the choices. The party only disintegrates if we keep wishing for a resurrection of Ronald Reagan rather than working pragmatically to find the best in what we have."
He talks as if most have already voted.
The pundits are trying to anoint the candidates they want without the pesky voters.
Very few Republican voters have had any say in the matter.
Moistly spot on except ....
“My e-mail sounds the frustration of this situation. Messages and comments on the blog have become filled with declarations of sitting on hands, the destruction of the party, and so on. However, the plain fact is that the actual party — the people voting for the candidates — have made it clear that they have a high level of comfort with Romney and McCain, and potentially Rudy as well.”
Rudy? Quit talking of Rudy like he’s a viable candidate.
His diceroll in Florida is looking more and more suspect with each single-digit primary showing.
http://travismonitor.blogspot.com/2008/01/state-of-presidential-primary-race.html
Rudy, Mitt, Cain....LOL...I’ll go with Rudy Giuliani.
Boy are you in for a surprise. Rudy Giuliani is very viable. Even Jeb Bush is working to get Rudy Giuliani elected.
Huckabee’s loss of SC should put some fire in the belly of republican conservatives, it’s now or never folks.
McCain would close down Gitmo, outlaw waterboarding and give all civil rights to terrorists that U.S. citizens have...and he understands how to fight the war against terror???? He is an absolute idiot with regard to fighting the war on terror.
He would also cause tens of millions of more illegals to come into the country after he grants amnesty to the 12-20 million already here. How many terrorists will be included in the invasion is anyones guess.
You are correct. rudy would be very viable as a Liberal Democrat candidate for President.
Translation:
Shut up and vote for one of the RHINOs.
You are not going to get what you really want and deserve, a conservative LEADER.
You will get what we (the GOP) give you and you will like it!
Where else are you gonna go?
The GOP is truly in sad shape!
What is this the DOZENTH post about “what now?”
Not just me in for a surprise if that’s the case ...
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4188/is_20070217/ai_n18624994
“Jeb Bush, who hasn’t publicly picked a favorite in the Republican presidential race, privately is talking up the candidacy of Mitt Romney and steering some of his closest advisers to the campaign.”
I call BULLSH!t.
This is not at all going well for conservatives.
FRED VETS, SIGN UP TODAY AT:
Open convention anyone?
no-to-illegals: “America Lives, She Breathes and Waves her Hand...And She (the lady) isn’t holding threes. God Bless the U.S.A.”
America lives, but it’s not the land of the free and home of the brave any longer. Most Americans are more interested in the false security of big government than individual liberty. Sad, but true.
Excellent article.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.