Skip to comments.
Exit Polls: South Carolina
CNN ^
| January 19, 2008
Posted on 01/19/2008 5:27:06 PM PST by Plutarch
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 next last
To: Plutarch
abortion.....too bad we can’t get a social conservative who’s a better all around guy...who can win a primary
the pitfalls of too many friggin folks running
the crap floats to the top
21
posted on
01/19/2008 5:45:58 PM PST
by
wardaddy
(Hey toe sucker Dicker Morris...you schlub.....kiss my proud Dixie butt you beyatch)
To: Dog Gone
Rudy is characterized, I think a bit unfairly, as the pro-choice candidate. If you are the guest speaker at a pro-abortion dinner it is easy to get that reputation.
To: Dog Gone
“It tells me that independents and Democrats infiltrated the GOP primary”
EXACTLY!
And, the CNN information regarding whether the voter described himself as liberal moderate or conservative, the MAJORITY of McCain voters said they were NOT conservative.....
23
posted on
01/19/2008 5:49:35 PM PST
by
bperiwinkle7
( In the beginning was the WORD................)
To: TheZMan
They’re both stupid and ignorant! PRO-LIFE candidate Duncan Hunter got 3% of the abortion vote? How can this be?
The voters down there were truly clueless, at least in that case.
And another thing - MSNBC is stating that the economy and illegal immigration were most important to SC GOP voters. So why the hell (yes I’m mad) would they support McCain?
24
posted on
01/19/2008 5:52:02 PM PST
by
Joann37
To: Plutarch
The Conservative bloc is in disarray because we have no Conservatives to vote for.
Hillary is coming back to the WH in 2008.
25
posted on
01/19/2008 5:52:49 PM PST
by
WorkingClassFilth
('Yellow is mellow, but brown goes down.' -- The Clinton campaign slogan for 2008)
To: WorkingClassFilth
we have no Conservatives to vote for
See tab.
26
posted on
01/19/2008 5:53:58 PM PST
by
TheZMan
(Vote Conservative in '08. Vote for Fred Thompson, the only one that won't screw up the country.)
To: WorkingClassFilth
Texas needs to split into 5 states, that way Rs would at least control the Senate.
27
posted on
01/19/2008 5:54:49 PM PST
by
txhurl
(Yes there were WMDs /Thompson/Netanyahu '08 / Yes you will vote against Clinton)
To: Plutarch
What this data shows is that Fred is not getting evangelical support, which he must have. He got totally screwed by Dobson when he said Fred wasn’t Christian enough. Fred got only 15% of the born again vote. McCain got more than that and Huck got 40%. Also, Fred is clearly not getting his message out when both McCain and Huck get substantially more of the pro-life and “deport the illegals” votes. The Republican party is dying before our eyes.
28
posted on
01/19/2008 5:56:34 PM PST
by
txjeep
To: Plutarch
McCain is getting a huge number of liberal votes.
29
posted on
01/19/2008 5:56:56 PM PST
by
Maelstorm
("Christ didn’t tell us to go to the government...He told us to do it." Fred Thompson)
To: Antoninus; TommyDale
That would have been horrid.
How would you like to have to support a VP candidate saddled with Bush's low poll numbers, having to support the president's amnesty bill, etc etc. It would be a disaster. And you wouldn't be supporting that veep, you'd be supporting someone else. But the veep would have enough establishment support to win the nom and then loose the general.
A Republican can win, but there is no way Bush would get 'third term.'
To: Mr. Brightside
Who would you rather have replacing Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Hillary or McCain?
McCain would likely name a squishy moderate like Sandra Day O’Conner.
That would be a slight improvement over anybody that Hillary would nominate.
31
posted on
01/19/2008 5:58:42 PM PST
by
proudpapa
(May God Bless Our Troops.)
To: txjeep
Yep. We’ve played the compromise game so long that when it comes down to the line, we don’t know where it is drawn.
32
posted on
01/19/2008 5:59:14 PM PST
by
WorkingClassFilth
('Yellow is mellow, but brown goes down.' -- The Clinton campaign slogan for 2008)
To: Plutarch
33
posted on
01/19/2008 6:02:18 PM PST
by
#1CTYankee
(That's right, I have no proof. So what of it??)
To: mbraynard
How would you like to have to support a VP candidate saddled with Bush's low poll numbers, having to support the president's amnesty bill, etc etc. It would be a disaster. And you wouldn't be supporting that veep, you'd be supporting someone else. But the veep would have enough establishment support to win the nom and then loose the general.
Sorry, this assumes that Bush would have rubbed his political brain cells together and realized at some point in 2006 that his amnesty bill was killing the GOP and that it not only should be scrapped, but turned into something the GOP could hammer the DEMOCRATS with.
Bush has badly fumbled the political football since 2004. Pathetically, even.
34
posted on
01/19/2008 6:04:04 PM PST
by
Antoninus
("Make all the promises you have to." --Mitt Romney)
To: rjp2005
"Only one term for HRC - no way she wins twice."With two or three Supreme Court Appointments, that would be the death of America if she were to gain even ONE 4-year term.
35
posted on
01/19/2008 6:04:50 PM PST
by
traditional1
(Thompson/Hunter '08)
To: proudpapa
McCain.
I would also rather have the military in his hands, not hers.
To: #1CTYankee
72% reporting
McCain 108,110 34% 0
Huckabee 92,627 29% 0
Thompson 49,243 16% 0
Romney 48,286 15% 0
Paul 11,299 4% 0
Giuliani 6,877 2% 0
Hunter 716 0% 0
37
posted on
01/19/2008 6:06:19 PM PST
by
TheZMan
(Vote Conservative in '08. Vote for Fred Thompson, the only one that won't screw up the country.)
To: #1CTYankee
That’s not enough for Fred Thompson! The U.S. is finished! Hello long-term socialism for the U.S. What are conservatives truly supposed to do next with nobody left to truly move conservative principles forward?
To: Plutarch
I think this link should work better.
39
posted on
01/19/2008 6:10:23 PM PST
by
Plutarch
To: proudpapa
mccain actually voted for Bork.
Bork now supports Romney. But I highly doubt Romney would appoint someone like Bork.
40
posted on
01/19/2008 6:10:29 PM PST
by
ari-freedom
(I want Fred to win but I really want Fred to want Fred to win.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson