Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dangus

I don’t understand the numbers. Does Fred have 13% support or 21? Is that 22% undecided?


19 posted on 01/19/2008 7:22:45 AM PST by cake_crumb (Being a preacher DOES NOT exempt you from being a liar and a crook)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: cake_crumb

Fred has 21%. The 13% is the 1/16 poll. He has 22% of GOP voters.


26 posted on 01/19/2008 7:31:00 AM PST by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: cake_crumb; dangus
I don’t understand the numbers.

Huckabee~~~23%~~~33%~~~37% Thompson~~~13%~~~21%~~~22% McCain~~~33%~~~26%~~~22% Romney~~~20%~~~9%~~~unreported Giuliani~~~4%~~~3%~~~unreported Paul~~~1%~~~2%~~~unreported Keyes~~~2%~~~1%~~~unreported Hunter~~~1%~~~1%~~~unreported

Me neither. Probably a kid with instant messenger syndrome.

28 posted on 01/19/2008 7:33:09 AM PST by Cobra64 (www.BulletBras.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: cake_crumb
Each of the percentages represents support over a three day period.

Jan. 16 at 13%

Jan. 17 at 21%

Jan. 18 at 22%.

32 posted on 01/19/2008 7:35:57 AM PST by Red_Devil 232 (VietVet - USMC All Ready On The Right? All Ready On The Left? All Ready On The Firing Line!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: cake_crumb
Free Image Hosting at allyoucanupload.com
34 posted on 01/19/2008 7:45:17 AM PST by Plutarch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: cake_crumb
ARG's polls, (like Zogby, and sadly, the once gold-standard Gallup) have been complete nonsense all primary season long.

I think political polls have actually become much less accurate over the last several decades. At one time, when most families had a single publicly-listed land-line telephone, picking a random list of names with only a few controls would produce a representative sampling. Furthermore, there were only a few major polling organizations, so if Gallup called your house, most regarded it as a bit of an opportunity to take part in the civic process and were willing to take the time to provide honest answers.

Today, there are many ways to avoid telephone calls. Furthermore, most people are annoyed because polling in close elections is so frequent, and distrustful because a very large percentage of polls are actually campaign advertisements. The result is that people who have busy lives and the means and sophistication to use wireless or caller IDs probably never speak with pollsters. Random sampling is simply impossible, and the only way for pollsters to generate any meaningful numbers is to carefully normalize the weighting of each demographic group and subgroup according to a pre-definied model. The problem is that those models are fixed, and if there are any unusual factors present (e.g., a property tax issue on the ballot will cause homeowners to turn out, religious voters are strongly motivated by a particular candidate, there's no race in the democratic primary so indepdents will vote in the republican primary), the pollsters can only guess at how that will effect the final numbers.

39 posted on 01/19/2008 7:50:17 AM PST by CaptainMorgantown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson