Skip to comments.
Tough Luck, Hillary
New York Post ^
| January 18, 2008
| Geoff Earle
Posted on 01/18/2008 11:28:35 AM PST by america4vr
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
To: slapshot
I don’t know that this applies to the general election. This is the party primary rules here like the Iowa caucuses and others, it has latitude not granted under federal and state general election rules.
21
posted on
01/18/2008 12:06:52 PM PST
by
caseinpoint
(Don't get thickly involved in thin things.)
To: slapshot
22
posted on
01/18/2008 12:14:54 PM PST
by
Roccus
(..........................FOR RENT......................)
To: america4vr
Did they just find out about this? Hillary doesn’t seem to have very good help. Or is it that it didn’t matter when she was the “inevitable” Dem nominee? Lawsuits already and it’s not even the General Election yet.
To: america4vr
Do you really think the voters will ever figure out what the Clintons are up to? It’s been sixteen years now, and apparently the sheeple still don’t understand the Clintons.
24
posted on
01/18/2008 12:50:01 PM PST
by
Theodore R.
( Cowardice is still forever!)
To: AwesomePossum
The Clintons are all for minorities, as long as they stay in their place, and don't get in the way..........A wonderful statement, and we could add: "so long as they vote Clinton."
25
posted on
01/18/2008 12:51:21 PM PST
by
Theodore R.
( Cowardice is still forever!)
To: america4vr
Sen. Clinton said she has "no opinion on the lawsuit," though she suggested people other than casino workers should get special precincts.
26
posted on
01/18/2008 12:52:37 PM PST
by
N. Theknow
(Kennedys: Can't drive, can't fly, can't ski, can't skipper a boat; but they know what's best for us)
To: sinanju
“pure classic uncut clinton. same taste, same bouquet.”
correction; pure classic uncut clinton. same tase, same bouqet, same old prairie pancakes.”
27
posted on
01/19/2008 5:39:26 AM PST
by
ripley
To: america4vr
TEAM CLINTON - Moving the goalposts for 35 years!
To: truthandlife
I am tired of looking at the itch and there you go posting another picture and ruining my morning.
29
posted on
01/19/2008 6:31:10 AM PST
by
Piquaboy
(22 year veteran of the Army, Air Force and Navy, Pray for all our military .)
To: america4vr
O'l billy the bastard said, "I think the rules ought to be the same for everyone."
Oh, my.
30
posted on
01/19/2008 6:34:40 AM PST
by
bannie
(clintons CHEAT! ALLLLLWAYS!)
To: america4vr
Can anyone explain what ol’ billy meant when he said on some clip that the casino “votes” would be worth five times—at least—more than the other “votes”?
Was that just more billy blow?
31
posted on
01/19/2008 6:36:47 AM PST
by
bannie
(clintons CHEAT! ALLLLLWAYS!)
To: Roccus
(I'm interested in renting your space...what's the fee?)
32
posted on
01/19/2008 6:44:38 AM PST
by
bannie
(clintons CHEAT! ALLLLLWAYS!)
To: Theodore R.
I think it should be, "...as long as they can OWN them."
33
posted on
01/19/2008 6:46:19 AM PST
by
bannie
(clintons CHEAT! ALLLLLWAYS!)
To: bannie
$50 contribution to FR.
};^)
34
posted on
01/19/2008 11:41:31 AM PST
by
Roccus
(..........................FOR RENT......................)
To: Miss Didi
Speaking of Perot, keep your eye on Bloomberg. He might think he can be the next Perot and enter as a self-financed independent at the request of his friend, Her Royal Thighness, thinking that he would draw more votes away from the GOP candidate than from her. I don’t think that the logic this time around is very sound, but no one should expect expect logic on the left to prevail.
To: ml/nj; firebrand; rmlew; dennisw; nyyankeefan; juliej; Nancee; Marysecretary; exit82; Fedora; ...
To: slapshot
This can bite repubs in the butt...As I understand it, this rule only applies to the Democrat caucus in Nevada, and not to the general election. So your argument is not valid.
To: america4vr
From the NY Post article:
The Clinton camp promised to "play by the rules that we're given."For anyone who believes that promise, I've got a bridge I'd like to sell you.
To: slapshot; Congressman Billybob; Kevmo
This can bite repubs in the butt...and maybe lose Nevada for the foreseeable future at large precincts where one just has to say he works somewhere near + no voter ID requirement= Massive fraud capabilities in a general election
Exactly my concern--that this is a Soros-manipulated strategy that seek to impact far beyond NV.
39
posted on
01/19/2008 12:29:22 PM PST
by
The Spirit Of Allegiance
(Public Employees: Honor Your Oaths! Defend the Constitution from Enemies--Foreign and Domestic!)
To: The Spirit Of Allegiance
My understanding is that the mega-precincts in the casinos required photo ID for those voting there. This is one more instance of Democrat hypocrisy. Generally, they oppose voter ID because a fair amount of the Democrat vote is illegal. However, in Nevada both the state and national parties approved voter ID in this one instance.
Congressman Billybob
Latest article, "Snow, Ice, and Lame Tom"
A Freeper in Congress? act now.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson