Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: forkinsocket
"Anthropologists believe that such object-specific counting, in which words like "half-dozen" and "six" denote the same quantity but refer to different objects, preceded abstract counting systems, in which any number can describe any object."

Huh?

Half-dozen can be used for more objects than just eggs. A half-dozen ice cubes, a half-dozen stars, a half-dozen pigs, a half-dozen movies. There, just used half-dozen for other objects.

3 posted on 01/15/2008 12:07:20 AM PST by Jedi Master Pikachu ( What is your take on Acts 15:20 (abstaining from blood) about eating meat? Could you freepmail?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Jedi Master Pikachu

I think they mean, in the example, “half-dozen” is only for eggs..

Then, abstracted, any quantity of six.

First a number designation was object specific, then abstracted to the same quantity of any object. The number became abstracted from its specific context.

I think.


5 posted on 01/15/2008 12:32:14 AM PST by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Jedi Master Pikachu

A better example might be Japanese where the words are modified for counting different things like people, time, the floors in a building, etc. English does this as well, but not nearly to the same extreme level of Japanese. For example, we use ‘primary’ and ‘first’ differently (where ‘primary’ is the first in a group or series while ‘first’ is a more general term).


9 posted on 01/15/2008 2:14:26 AM PST by burzum (None shall see me, though my battlecry may give me away -Minsc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson