Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What Has Happened to Ron Paul?
The National Ledger ^

Posted on 01/14/2008 2:28:06 PM PST by mnehring

It was supposed to be a revolution. Ron Paul was set to take America and the world by storm by winning primary after primary on his way to the White House. The supporters of the ten-term US Congressman from Texas were convinced that the money he raised would equal support at the actual ballot box. Now in the cold hard days of January, the truth has broken though.

So what has happened to Ron Paul? The answer isn't difficult; his support was never very large to begin with. It was magnified by a presence on the Internet (or the "Internets" if you prefer) and it would never push through into the real world of voting. This was never really anything more than an online revolution that could never come close to cracking the mainstream of political thought.

***

For a dark horse candidate, he made all that he could out of his Libertarian philosophies. He brought forward a whole bunch of young folks that didn't really understand the political process and they are now excited and involved. Of course, Iowa and New Hampshire slapped many of them across the face and Michigan and New Hampshire will do the same. Come February 5 even the staunchest Paul political supporter will have to realize that it isn't going to happen.

The problem that many didn't really understand is that Paul wasn't preaching anything new. This was the same Libertarian Party line that had been regurgitated over and over in one form of another for election after election. I'm not certain why so many thought it might be "magical" this campaign season.

***

There is a reason that the Libertarian Party exists in relative obscurity. Though many of us hold several of the ideas of the party dear to our hearts and believe them fully, once the movement of the fringe takes hold it is too much to bear for most people.

Many scoffed at the "mainstream" and believed they didn't need them as their man Ron Paul would rise above and dominate. They didn't believe the polls that showed little support and the true believers don't even believe the votes that have been cast at the ballot box. I'm not certain if Paul and his supporters will go away quietly, but one thing is certain, they won't win this election or even come close enough to move the political debate.


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 911truth; libertarian; lies; obviously; paulestinians; ronpaul; shootthemessenger; shrimpforsale; slanders; smearcampaign; stormfrontlosesagain; thebuchananeffect
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 281-299 next last
To: mnehrling
Ron Paul was set to take America and the world by storm by winning primary after primary on his way to the White House.

Anyone who believed this is a retard. Paul is in the race to make small government a point of debate, and has done a damned good job of it.

81 posted on 01/14/2008 3:33:51 PM PST by jmc813 (Don't screw this up, vote for Thompson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
"You guys are laughing at Paul now but I think the good Doctor is going to have the last laugh come the general election"

Why? You told any and all freepers that would listen to you for months that Paul definitely would not run a third party campaign. Paul promised his wife he would not too. If he runs a third party candidacy, I guess Paul's and your credibility and word will be worthless.
82 posted on 01/14/2008 3:35:53 PM PST by jrooney (Ron Paul called Reagan a Dramatic Failure and thinks he is smarter than Abe Lincoln.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: death2tyrants
It is clear to anyone with more than two brain cells that Paul only appeals to anti-war suicide idiots. Those of us who also champion small limited government know that none of it will matter much if America performs suicide on itself. Conservatism IS about small government and a strong national defense, not the one submarine w/nukes that Ron Paul proposes.

If Paul goes third party, nobody will notice, not even the RATs whom most of the vote will come from.

83 posted on 01/14/2008 3:36:02 PM PST by lormand (Paultards - The Hemorrhoids of American Politics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

I just did a search for this author and he’s even more obsessed with Paul than you. Good God.


84 posted on 01/14/2008 3:36:53 PM PST by jmc813 (Don't screw this up, vote for Thompson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Thanks to Ron Paul, thousands of ordinary folks have awoken from their stupor. A new generation of conservatives have been born. Paul will be spoken in the same breath 20 years from now as Reagan is now. Who's going to call themselves a "Thompson Republican" 20 years from now? A "Giuliani Republican?"

One way that Paul could make a permanent Goldwater-style mark might be to set forth a series of detailed papers on what he will do to fix specific domestic issues, such as health care or the borders problem. Make these specific enough so that years from now, they can be Googled by people, surrounded by the wreckage of Democrat and Republican policies, who want to try something new.

85 posted on 01/14/2008 3:37:08 PM PST by BlazingArizona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: death2tyrants
It’d be nice to see, perhaps, if Hillary beats Obama for the nomination, many on the anti-war left will vote for Paul to punish Hillary for her vote to go to war.

Actually that's not true. A Ron Paul 3rd party run would devastate the GOP far more than the Democrats.

The anti-war left isn't behind Paul. They're behind folks like Obama and Kucinich. You see, the vast majority of Americans want the war to wind down and most of these folks are supporting Paul. These folks also never voted before or participated in politics.

But by all means, please keep airbrushing a large portion of the electorate who simply oppose the war (but who are conservative on all of the other issues) as a bunch of leftist moonbats.

86 posted on 01/14/2008 3:37:31 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (GIANT SUCKING SOUND AT LAMBEAU FIELD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: lormand
If Paul goes third party, nobody will notice

Oh, don't worry. I'm sure you'll be on FR bashing him even more than you do now.

87 posted on 01/14/2008 3:37:37 PM PST by jmc813 (Don't screw this up, vote for Thompson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: jmc813
Anyone who believed this is a retard. Paul is in the race to make small government a point of debate, and has done a damned good job of it.

Might be worth talking about once the grave-dancing and self-congratulation settles down.

88 posted on 01/14/2008 3:37:47 PM PST by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
"Where am I spamming Ron Paul?"

Uhhh, post #60?

Imagine a thread critical of Cindy Sheehan, then here comes a "Freeper" to defend her.

That is a pretty close analogy to what you do here on Freerepublic.

89 posted on 01/14/2008 3:38:14 PM PST by lormand (Paultards - The Hemorrhoids of American Politics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: jmc813

National Ledger comes up with a Paul hit piece every other day. They’re about as credible as Wonkette.


90 posted on 01/14/2008 3:38:17 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (GIANT SUCKING SOUND AT LAMBEAU FIELD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

I was told today that Ron Paul is the only true conservative. Another one said if Christians don’t vote for him, there is something wrong with them AND the elections are rigged so that he won’t get elected. The one elected will be elected by the globalists not the people. I’ve been more turned off by the Paul supporters than Paul himself.


91 posted on 01/14/2008 3:38:20 PM PST by imskylark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling
What Has Happened to Ron Paul?

Nothing as far as I can tell. I'm already getting his junk mail and seeing the large lawn signs in my neck of the woods...........

92 posted on 01/14/2008 3:38:57 PM PST by Hot Tabasco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: who_would_fardels_bear
And this auther is particularly annoying: those of us who aren't dyed-in-the-wool republicans are urged by republicans to work within the party to advance our ideas rather than start third parties and split the conservative/libertarian vote. But this author just wants to talk about how unsuccessful the libertarian party has been, and imply that all libertarianism will always be trounced and everyone who doesn't agree with the republicans should stay in the party AND shut up about their true beliefs.

Sounds like the freepers Jim booted last year.

93 posted on 01/14/2008 3:39:28 PM PST by jmc813 (Don't screw this up, vote for Thompson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: lormand
Why is it that not even Ron Paul calls himself a Conservative, but you Paultards find it nessessary to spew this Al Qaeda dupe all over FreeRepublic and try to link Conservatism with it.

Because if we want to be fair, there IS a lot of Ron Paul platform acreage out there beyond the al Qaeda stuff, planks that should interest us all.

94 posted on 01/14/2008 3:39:52 PM PST by BlazingArizona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
"Your boy Bush is..."

Paultard diversion attempt # 9,376,526,853!!!


95 posted on 01/14/2008 3:41:22 PM PST by lormand (Paultards - The Hemorrhoids of American Politics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Khepri
There are Libertarians that support the war...they call themselves Neolibertarians.

I support the war and I'm a small-l libertaian, no qualifier necessary. The only person I ever saw claim they were "neolibertarian" was that Luis Gonzales dude who got thrown off FR a while back. The dude was not even remotely libertarian. He believed in gun control, for crying out loud.

96 posted on 01/14/2008 3:41:41 PM PST by jmc813 (Don't screw this up, vote for Thompson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: jrooney
You told any and all freepers that would listen to you for months that Paul definitely would not run a third party campaign.

That was just my opinion. I don't have any control over Paul or his campaign. If he runs 3rd party or Independent, that's his business.

Paul promised his wife he would not too. If he runs a third party candidacy, I guess Paul's and your credibility and word will be worthless.

But...but...only troofers, white supremacists (and now Al-Qaida!) people are supporting Paul - so...that would help the GOP then, right? You guys aren't going to support him anyway regardless. Why do you care? Plus if he didn't run 3rd party, you and the GOP elites will support Peden in the Congressional race and stab Paul in the back again. If Thompson or Hunter is not the GOP nominee, I will ENCOURAGE Dr. Paul to run 3rd party. I won't support Paul if Thompson is the GOP nominee though.

97 posted on 01/14/2008 3:43:19 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (GIANT SUCKING SOUND AT LAMBEAU FIELD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: lormand
Freepers who shill for Ron Paul should be shown the Zot kitty as well.

You're still bitter about how Jim chooses to run his forum. Get over it, broseph.

98 posted on 01/14/2008 3:43:59 PM PST by jmc813 (Don't screw this up, vote for Thompson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: mamelukesabre
"He was about cutting government to the bone. In his mind that meant cutting the military too."

Bull?

What is the first thing he talks about cutting? The Military!

Why?

Because he is an anti-war suicide monkey.

99 posted on 01/14/2008 3:44:29 PM PST by lormand (Paultards - The Hemorrhoids of American Politics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: submarinerswife
Still wondering if the mods were on vacation through out this whole Ron Paul fiasco.

Another poster bitching about FR management. Do you people even donate, I hope?

100 posted on 01/14/2008 3:45:01 PM PST by jmc813 (Don't screw this up, vote for Thompson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 281-299 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson