[Soliton]

I don’t care what either of them did in the 1976 or 1980 campaigns, unless it was something illegal.

Then stop mentioning Reagan and Thompson in the same breath.

[Petronski]

Then stop mentioning Reagan and Thompson in the same breath.

Why? Their positions are similar in many ways.

[Invincibly Ignorant]

Since you and Huck can’t put up any kind of argument based on issues I guess I’m going to have to conclude the only thing that matters to you in picking a candidate is who can scream Jesus the loudest.

[Cobra64]

Soooo.... Ridlde me this Batman. Who is your choice? One word will suffice.

[Tax-chick]

Then stop mentioning Reagan and Thompson in the same breath.

I never have, that I recall. Much as I admired President Reagan, he's not a candidate in this election.

[WOSG]

I don’t care what either of them did in the 1976 or 1980 campaigns, unless it was something illegal. Then stop mentioning Reagan and Thompson in the same breath.

Supre lame-o again. When Reagan comparisons popped up earlier in the season, Thompson was the first to discount them and say no, he's not Reagan.

There is no Reagan in the race. So what. We have to pick the best in the field we have, not compare against an idealized great ex-President.

And yet, if you are asking who is the most conservative in the race considering economic, social and foreign policy ... the ranking would come out:

Hunter > Thompson > Romney > McCain > Guiliani > Huckabee

That's right. Huckabee comes out dead LAST. He's the least qualified and least conservative candidate in the race.