Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/11/2008 7:09:49 AM PST by jdm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
To: All

Stimulus?


2 posted on 01/11/2008 7:10:46 AM PST by jdm (A Hunter Thompson ticket would be suicide.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jdm

Is she going to print it in her cellar or take it from us at gunpoint?

My guess is the latter.


3 posted on 01/11/2008 7:11:16 AM PST by Westbrook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jdm

“Democratic presidential contender Hillary Clinton on Friday will propose a $70 billion emergency spending package and possibly another $40 billion tax rebate to counter what she sees as a coming recession, according to the New York Times.”

She just added another $30 billion to the National Debt...yet preaches about fiscal responsibility?


4 posted on 01/11/2008 7:12:17 AM PST by Slapshot68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jdm
Clinton's emergency spending plan would add to the federal budget deficit ...
5 posted on 01/11/2008 7:12:52 AM PST by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jdm

Just trying to beat Bush to the punch. Rumors are that Bush will suggest the similar in the State Of The Union address.


6 posted on 01/11/2008 7:13:19 AM PST by golfisnr1 (Democrats are like roaches - hard to get rid of.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jdm

As usual, the ‘Rat’s solution to everything is to spend more money and when that doesn’t work, MAYBE they will talk about cutting taxes. After spending more money.


7 posted on 01/11/2008 7:13:21 AM PST by Blood of Tyrants (G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jdm
Yo Hillary, want to stimulate the Economy? Make the tax cuts permanent and enact new ones. Forget these gimmicks designed to do nothing but employ more Govt Bureaucrats
8 posted on 01/11/2008 7:13:30 AM PST by MNJohnnie (Instead of "Swift Boaters", 2008 Democrats have "Short Bussers"-Freeper Sax)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jdm

A 70 billion dollar spending package followed by a 40 billion dollar tax rebate sounds like a 30 billion dollar spending package to me. That’s if you would ever see the rebate in a Clinton administration to begin with. Probably it would end up being a 70 billion dollar spending package alone. No matter though, it would simply be added to the deficit. No taxes would be raised. This woman is a dangerous fool.


13 posted on 01/11/2008 7:16:32 AM PST by johniegrad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jdm

Nothing new here - Clinton is using the typical political bribery to get votes. Must say that Bush is no better. And before he starts cutting taxes again, he might want to wake up and realize that it is very easy to veto these ridiculous, ludicrous Federal spending bills. The problem is twofold: we are being taxed to death and the Feds are spending us to death. There has to be something in the water in D.C., because people normally go insane once they are living there.


14 posted on 01/11/2008 7:17:42 AM PST by DennisR (Look around - God gives countless clues that He does, indeed, exist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jdm

Sell Las Vegas to China, and make sure Harry Reid is part of the package.


15 posted on 01/11/2008 7:19:17 AM PST by HisKingdomWillAbolishSinDeath (Christ's Kingdom on Earth is the answer. What is your question?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jdm

FTA:

“Clinton’s emergency spending plan would add to the federal budget deficit and not be offset by tax increases or budget cuts, her campaign told the Times.”

........for a week or two at least.


16 posted on 01/11/2008 7:19:23 AM PST by Roccus (..........................FOR RENT......................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jdm

Same thing her husband proposed. Lousy idea. It won’t work.


19 posted on 01/11/2008 7:26:07 AM PST by RexBeach ("Americans never quit." Douglas MacArthur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jdm

Now what’s Obama’s offer? LOL

The Dems are going to have so much fun choosing between the lesser of two evils.

I imagine it will be the one that can lie the most so that would be a hard choice.


20 posted on 01/11/2008 7:27:00 AM PST by freekitty ((May the eagles long fly our beautiful and free American sky.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jdm

Typical communist ... bigger government is the solution to all problems.


21 posted on 01/11/2008 7:28:23 AM PST by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilisation is aborting, buggering, and contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jdm

Note to the nation: Wanna see what ‘Rats and RINOS can do for you? Check out Upstate NY’s economy. The ‘Rats and RINOs are doing such a great job that we may lose a couple of House seats next time around. Three guesses why Spitzer wanted to give driver’s licenses to illegals....


23 posted on 01/11/2008 7:35:57 AM PST by mewzilla (In politics the middle way is none at all. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jdm

How convenient....a media-trumped up recession and Hillary our savior here to rescue us. BARF!


25 posted on 01/11/2008 7:37:58 AM PST by Eagle of Liberty ("I am not a neoconservative. I am pro-American." - John Bolton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jdm

It would be far simpler to just suggest that each American go out and get a cash advance of $1000 on their credit card.

The economic effect would be identical as when the government borrows it on our behalf, except government gets to borrow in the name of everyone, gets to force some people to repay more than others and gets to dole out the money to maximize its own power.

This is all a Keynesian folly. We can borrow all we want because we are borrowing from ourselves! And we trust ourselves to repay us, don’t we? So silly and So Wrong.


26 posted on 01/11/2008 7:41:56 AM PST by theBuckwheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jdm

you can defer the inevitable but the inevitable is the inevitable...................


27 posted on 01/11/2008 7:43:22 AM PST by PeterPrinciple ( Seeking the truth here folks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jdm

I fail to see how that would do much to stimulate the economy. Tax rebates are among the least-effective stimulants because they are retroactive and so they don’t change incentives and future behavior the way tax cuts do.


29 posted on 01/11/2008 7:51:32 AM PST by Young Scholar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jdm

Maybe she is going to go to Wall Street and get it back from the companies who gave out almost that in “Bonuses” in December.


30 posted on 01/11/2008 7:53:58 AM PST by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson