Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Human Events endorses Fred Thompson
Human Events ^ | 1-11-08 | Editors

Posted on 01/11/2008 2:51:20 AM PST by PosterQue

We begin by recalling the profound words of Ronald Reagan at the Conservative Political Action Conference Feb. 15, 1975: “A political party cannot be all things to all people. It must represent certain fundamental beliefs which must not be compromised to political expediency or simply to swell its numbers.” We believed that then, and we believe it now. The issue for us -- and for the conservative community -- boils down to which of the candidates is most representative of the fundamental conservative principles we believe in. The answer is Fred Thompson.

(Excerpt) Read more at humanevents.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Extended News; Politics/Elections; US: South Carolina; US: Tennessee
KEYWORDS: elections; fred; fredthompson; humanevents; thompson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-178 next last
Is this the big endorsement?
1 posted on 01/11/2008 2:51:21 AM PST by PosterQue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: PosterQue

This isn’t big.


2 posted on 01/11/2008 2:54:47 AM PST by Rudder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PosterQue
That is a strong endorsement. Fred may be a serious factor yet. Today was far and away his best. What remains to be seen, will he truly catch fire, or is this just a flare up, with the majority of Republicans.
3 posted on 01/11/2008 2:56:00 AM PST by HisKingdomWillAbolishSinDeath (Christ's Kingdom on Earth is the answer. What is your question?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PosterQue

I sure hope our friends in South Carolina bring Fred to the front. Looks like it may be our last chance for any worthwhile candidate other than Duncan Hunter, who is almost unnoticed by the media. (mainstream or otherwise)


4 posted on 01/11/2008 3:00:35 AM PST by SWEETSUNNYSOUTH (Help stamp out liberalism!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PosterQue

But it is better than a JFKerry endorsement...more to come.


5 posted on 01/11/2008 3:22:51 AM PST by iopscusa (El Vaquero. (SC Lowcountry Cowboy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SWEETSUNNYSOUTH

Fred helped himself last night,but I’m afraid Huck and Fred are going to take enough real conservative and liberal Christian votes so as to give our state to McCain with a plurality.A big majority of SC Republicans can’t stand McCain but their votes will be split.
This is McCain’s latest effort to destroy the power of conservative Republicans.
Planned it all along.


6 posted on 01/11/2008 3:27:48 AM PST by Happy Rain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SWEETSUNNYSOUTH

Fred helped himself last night,but I’m afraid Huck and Fred are going to take enough real conservative and liberal Christian votes so as to give our state to McCain with a plurality.A big majority of SC Republicans can’t stand McCain but their votes will be split.
This is McCain’s latest effort to destroy the power of conservative Republicans.
Planned it all along.


7 posted on 01/11/2008 3:27:59 AM PST by Happy Rain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: PosterQue
“A political party cannot be all things to all people. It must represent certain fundamental beliefs which must not be compromised to political expediency or simply to swell its numbers.”

Tells you how he would look at the four RINOs who were littering the stage of the debate last night.



U.S. Army Retired


8 posted on 01/11/2008 3:33:08 AM PST by big'ol_freeper (REAGAN: "..party..must represent certain fundamental beliefs [not] compromised..[for] expediency")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Happy Rain

Could Fred and Huck make a deal against Mc Cain?
Unless HUCK is a Mc Cain troll to divide christian conservatives


9 posted on 01/11/2008 3:48:08 AM PST by Ulysse (a)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Happy Rain

Thompson was more animated than I have ever seen him. That is the good part, but to be honest I was disappointed in him.

Fred Thompson always projected the aura of “Elder-Statesman” to me (Kind of a Ben Franklin-type or any other person of “perceived authority”).

Last night, he came across as weak to me.

Not that his attack was weak, but because he felt the need to attack. (in this case Huckabee)

He is saying “The only way for me to win is to make Huckabee weaker”. By the end of the debate, it was becoming old, because it looked like his entire message was “Huckabee = bad”. He wasted time on Huckabee, when he should have been talking about his own record/position, since up to now nobody had ever heard it (from him). If he had stopped after the first couple of Huckabee attacks, he would have been better, and left Huckabee worse. (NOTE: I say this as a Huckabee supporter)

He did himself no favors, except to enthuse the people that were supporting him anyway.

That’s my opinion; others may differ


10 posted on 01/11/2008 3:52:32 AM PST by RangerM (Jesus was likely a very good carpenter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: PosterQue

One of many to come. This is the time we will all remember as the beginning. Just because a bunch of other fools have been running around the block for months doesn’t mean they started the race. The game begins at the same time it always has; not at the pep rally, but when the clock starts, and this is the kick-off.


11 posted on 01/11/2008 3:55:36 AM PST by Laurita (Fence sitters are easier to pick off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ulysse
Could Fred and Huck make a deal against Mc Cain? Unless HUCK is a Mc Cain troll to divide christian conservatives

There is at least an unspoken agreement that Huck won't interfere too heavily where he is weak (e.g. northeast, west coast). Huckabee and Thompson are largely competing for the same votes. With Romney retreating from South Carolina, McCain can be competitive if Huck/Thompson split the conservative Christian vote. I can think of no deal that Huck/Thompson can make that would be advantageous to both of them.

Huck has a path to nomination (win primaries in south & heartland, pick of delegates in other states), so he has no need to be a troll for McCain.
12 posted on 01/11/2008 3:58:47 AM PST by Dr. Sivana (Not a newbie, I just wanted a new screen name.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Rudder

It’s a good endorsement but it was over hyped yesterday on this site (surprised?). There were hints of an NRA endorsement or even a Rush endorsement so Human Events seems smaller in comparison. Maybe this isn’t “the big one” that was hinted at and maybe there’s more coming but if this is it, well... like I said, it’s a good endorsement, just not thunderous.


13 posted on 01/11/2008 4:02:21 AM PST by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: big'ol_freeper

Huck on Morning Joe...said Fred forgot to take his Metamucil.


14 posted on 01/11/2008 4:04:05 AM PST by TornadoAlley3 ( UNITED BY OUR CORE BELIEFS Fred08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RangerM
Huckabee attacks Romney, Romney attacks McCain and Huckabee, McCain attacks Romney. If you notice that is why they have gotten so much attention in the last debates.

Huckabee has been passing himself off as something he is not and in the process taking votes that would normally go to Fred. If Fred did not expose Huckabee's statements and former positions no one would.

I thought Fred did great and forced Huckabee to defend his positions and thats part of the game of politics.

Huckabee and McCain give generalities and when confronted on former votes or former statements they tend to have nothing to fall back on but accusations of negative campaigning.

Huckabee and McCain looked bad tonight. Its good for Huck to taste the real fire because if he can't get through Republican attacks how will he withstand the Clinton machine that know him so well.

I also agree with your tagline.

15 posted on 01/11/2008 4:08:38 AM PST by normy (Don't take it personally, just take it seriously.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: RangerM
He did himself no favors, except to enthuse the people that were supporting him anyway.

That’s my opinion; others may differ

I beg to differ with you. I was in the audience at the debate last night sitting next to an "undecided" who really wasn't leaning toward Fred and after the debate asked me how she could get more involved in helping to elect Fred. She, among others, sitting near me were totally impressed with Fred.

16 posted on 01/11/2008 4:11:58 AM PST by 2nd amendment mama ( www.2asisters.org | Self defense is a basic human right!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TornadoAlley3

Wake up sheeple! Huck is Jimmy Carter in republican clothing: well intentioned, but dumb as a stump when it comes to the world outside Arkansas. God help us if Huckabee gets the nomination.


17 posted on 01/11/2008 4:12:46 AM PST by rightandproudofit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: rightandproudofit

MSNBC is really slamming Fred and calling Huck a Ronald Reagan for how he is handling Fred’s criticism. Maybe voters do not watch the MSM:0)


18 posted on 01/11/2008 4:15:25 AM PST by TornadoAlley3 ( UNITED BY OUR CORE BELIEFS Fred08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: normy

Huckabee was on Fox & Friends this morning saying that Fred lied about him in his attacks and should have spent more time talking about his own record. I was shocked. Huckabee wouldn’t know the truth if it hit him upside his head.


19 posted on 01/11/2008 4:18:18 AM PST by publana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: publana
Huck is the one who lies about his positions. I get really tired of Huck and McCains whining when their positions are scrutinized. Jeeze Romney and Rudy have taken a pounding and they aren’t crying.
20 posted on 01/11/2008 4:21:04 AM PST by normy (Don't take it personally, just take it seriously.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-178 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson