Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

If there's no FRed and no Hunter and we're left with the four headless RINOs, then what?
January 10, 2008 | Jim Robinson

Posted on 01/10/2008 3:40:52 PM PST by Jim Robinson

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 581-582 next last
To: All

The only thing we can do is to give all we can to Fred. I was giving a little at a time to have some I could give later but I scratched that plan. I and my wife are giving all we can right now to try and push Fred back to the top. There’s only 2 people in this race I can vote for and Fred is the only one with a chance.


61 posted on 01/10/2008 3:56:55 PM PST by A1 Southern Man (Fred Thompson , the one who can win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Giuliani, Huckabee, McCain are all fervent compassionate conservatives. I’d *really* like to avoid four or eight more years of that if possible. Romney is almost one, but he talks tough on immigration and let’s face it - he’s been the only guy to call McCain out on that.

Sorry but, if Thompson, Hunter, or even Romney don’t make it to Super Special Awesome Tuesday, I *will* vote for Ron Paul just to stick it to compassionate conservatism. The merging of the parties is unacceptable.


62 posted on 01/10/2008 3:57:51 PM PST by Bull Market (Thompson/Paul 08 - Republicans, Libertarians, Independents MUST join forces to defeat Hitlery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

I am stunned once again. I guess this explains why FR doesn’t have McCain Truth Files or Huck Truth Files.

It just astounds me that FR might throw its support behind someone like McCain who won’t even make a promise on our issues. He just spits in your eye and tells you to f-off.

If someone is campaigning as a conservative, there is a least a chance he would govern as a conservative—even if there are some flaws in his past. If someone is campaigning as a liberal and has always been a liberal, you’re smokin’ something if you think he is going to be conservative—especially with a liberal MSM kiss-up record like McCain’s.

And that’s not to mention the character flaws. Which brings me to Huck . . .

As I see it FR has been a big part (that may give it too much credit) of the disintegration of the conservative movement. This personal pettiness is just senseless.


63 posted on 01/10/2008 3:57:57 PM PST by Stunned
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JOE6PAK

LOL!


64 posted on 01/10/2008 3:58:19 PM PST by pissant (Duncan Hunter: Warrior, Statesman, Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

MCain? Unbelievable.


65 posted on 01/10/2008 3:58:59 PM PST by processing please hold (Duncan Hunter '08) (ROP and Open Borders-a terrorist marriage and hell's coming with them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Apply the index finger and thumb to opposite sides of the exterior of the nose. Squeeze gently until the stink subsides and, using the opposite hand, mark your ballot for the candidate with the “R” next to his/her name.

This may cause some short term discomfort, dizziness or shortness of breath, but may enable us to live to fight another day.

The RINOs have let us down, there’s no question. It may be the best use of a Republican, right now, is as an obsructionist. I think our best strategy at this point is to take them out on a case-by-case basis and replace them over time. The alternative is grim.


66 posted on 01/10/2008 3:59:14 PM PST by get'emall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

We get behind whoever is nominated..end of story. There was a story about Reagan. When there was a candidate that was elected that was’nt just so, Reagan would tell everyone that thats the person we back, because the alternative is not whats wanted.
Right now I would bet that McCain will get it. Of course that can change (I hope) and if McCain does get it I look for him to take a REAL conservative for a running mate to get some support from REAL conservatives. And I believe that would be Fred or Hunter.

We let the likes of any of the socialists in and we’ll be in for a real time and I believe a real dandy war near the end of the term. They’ll gut the military, raise taxes which will collapse an already shakey economy and look to see some real dandy socialist programs put in no matter how bad the economy is.

So whats the choice?


67 posted on 01/10/2008 3:59:38 PM PST by crz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Vote for no one. I won’t compromise my principles, hold my nose, and vote for the lesser of two socialists.

It’s like deciding whether you want to drive off a cliff at 60 mph or 90mph - either way, we’re going over the cliff.


68 posted on 01/10/2008 3:59:57 PM PST by ItsOurTimeNow ("Never get involved in a land war in Asia.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
"If there's no FRed and no Hunter and we're left with the four headless RINOs, then what?"

Vote for Mc Cain. He is better than Hillary or Obama.

But what we really need to worry about is getting more seats in both houses.

69 posted on 01/10/2008 4:00:04 PM PST by OldEagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

I won’t vote this time around except for state and local elections.

As long as we keep voting for the liberal Republican( as though conservative principles no longer matter), we will keep getting a liberal Republican. These candidates, other than Hunter and Fred, just make me too ill.

Probably by letting those principles slip away in small increments by voting for RINOs, we have damaged conservatism as we have known it. We have learned that we never get our way when we compromise values. We just get passed by.

I get the impression that the new book on conservatism has been written for the GOP. Appears to be a take it or leave it situation.


70 posted on 01/10/2008 4:00:08 PM PST by dforest (Duncan Hunter is the best hope we have on both fronts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lesser_satan
I could probably hold my nose and vote for Mitt. I won’t vote for Huckabee or Rudy, and probably not McCain either.

If Fred and Hunter are out, I'd have to agree.

71 posted on 01/10/2008 4:00:21 PM PST by icwhatudo (The rino borg...is resistance futile?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: JOE6PAK
DRINK!

DRINK, and BLOAT.

72 posted on 01/10/2008 4:00:27 PM PST by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Thanks boss, I both appreciate and sadly concur with your assessment on the RINOs. The overriding consideration is, of course, no more Clintoons in our lifetime. America, as lost as it is, is not ready to elect anyone named Barack Hussein Obama.
73 posted on 01/10/2008 4:00:40 PM PST by j_tull (Massachusetts, the Gay State. Once the leader of the American Revolution, now leading its demise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

The fraudulent four vs. Hillary?

What’s the difference?


74 posted on 01/10/2008 4:00:44 PM PST by Califreak (Duncan Hunter-no clothespin necessary! Subvert the party comrades!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ol' Sparky

KOS and “Black Leaders’ in Michigan are urging thier followers to vote on the Republican side, and to vote for McCain....

If THAT deosn’t tell you something, NOTHING WILL..


75 posted on 01/10/2008 4:01:16 PM PST by tcrlaf (VOTE DEMOCRAT-You'll look great in a Burka!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

and I am afraid McCain would have to be my (gulp) choice as well. I cannot forgive Huckabee for dissing the Commander-in-Chief.


76 posted on 01/10/2008 4:01:19 PM PST by Keith (ANY REPUBLICAN in 2008 -- it's about defeating Mrs. Bill Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ron in Acreage
We vote AGAINST Hillary.

In favor of Hillary Lite? No thanks. Better a bullet in the head than the Death of a Thousand Cuts.

77 posted on 01/10/2008 4:01:55 PM PST by IronJack (=)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Where are the Conservatives this year? Surely they can’t all be jumping on the Huckster’s bandwagon.

Fred Thompson gets 1% of the vote in New Hampshire? Good Grief Charlie Brown, I’ve got that many conservatives in my subdivision here in Texas.

WHAT THE HECK IS GOING ON?!?!?!


78 posted on 01/10/2008 4:02:21 PM PST by no dems (FRED THOMPSON: The only Conservative running who can beat Hillary or Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

If the final choices are truly between a socialistic R and a socialistic D, then socialism wins every time! Conservatism is slowly dying in the U.S., and too many people throughout the U.S. don’t even know about this yet! A U.S. long-term “mess” is truly just around the corner. A Democratic takeover of everything important, starting in January ‘09, will finish off all conservatism with the enactment of “The Fairness Doctrine” legislation, and endless waves of illegal immigrants will also be coming to the U.S. to take full advantage of newly created amnesty legislation including newly created legislation which will allow illegal immigrants to legally vote in all future U.S. elections throughout the U.S.!


79 posted on 01/10/2008 4:02:24 PM PST by johnthebaptistmoore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Names Ash Housewares
A RINO + Ron (Perot) Paul = Democrat in the White House

You really don't get it, do you.

This post (not yours, from JimRob) just confirms how weak the GOP field is.

Both Hillary & Obama have raised over $100 million last year. How much have Rudy, Romney, McCain, Thompson, and Huckabee raised?

Democrat primary voters are beating the Republican voters more than 2-1.

There's a serious dilemma here that will do the GOP in come November:

- They have completely abandoned traditional conservatism in favor of authoritarian statism & sell-out to big corporations
- Most Americans, unfortunately, oppose the war
- The Republican candidates besides Paul aren't addressing the weak dollar and inflation

Without the libertarians and independents, the GOP is going to lose in Reagan/Mondale proportions.

80 posted on 01/10/2008 4:02:28 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Seahawks should have went South for the winter - instead they're coming to Lambeau!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 581-582 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson