Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

They Crack Me Up
American Spectator ^ | 10 jan 08 | R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr.

Posted on 01/10/2008 4:57:28 AM PST by rellimpank

WASHINGTON -- Stepping back from the febrile blare that the political classes have orchestrated around the Iowa caucuses and now the New Hampshire primary, allow me to make an observation that some will say is lacking in humility. Well, to be honest, of all the virtues, humility is the one that I simply cannot stick. I mean, what is the point of it? Now that we have two presidential contests behind us and the Clintons thrashing to maintain a one-digit lead nationally over Senator Barack Obama, where only a couple of weeks back the lead was in the double digits, it appears that I have been right for months. We are in the midst of a Clinton crack-up.

(Excerpt) Read more at spectator.org ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: democrats; elctions; hillary

1 posted on 01/10/2008 4:57:29 AM PST by rellimpank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rellimpank

A 1-digit lead over Obama is completely decisive, as Clinton has the vast majority of superdelegates.

It will be Clinton in the primary.


2 posted on 01/10/2008 5:07:45 AM PST by agere_contra (Do not confuse the wealth of nations with the wealth of government - FDT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rellimpank

He says that young Democrats are finally breaking with the liberal 60’s generation that has been ruling the Democratic party for a long time.

So what do the young Democrats want? Even more liberalism and big gov’t?


3 posted on 01/10/2008 5:07:58 AM PST by webstersII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rellimpank
“Hillary was reduced to tears just before the balloting began.”

While I agree that it seems a large part of the liberal electorate is tired of the Clintons and dreads another four years of defending and hiding their actions, the premise of Tyrell’s argument in this argument is flawed.

He is stating that the Clinton machine is flying apart at the rivets and bolts based upon troubles in the primaries. This is foolish. The Left and the liberals may court Hussein Obama in the primaries (in large part to push the Clintons overtly to the Left as in denouncing the war and praising punitive taxation for the countries higher earners), but if Clinton wins the nomination for the Democrat (not -ic) party, they will all fall in line behind her. Yes, they will pinch their noses and vote for her.

I haven’t read Tyrell’s book, but if he uses information such as the line I quoted above as evidence of the dissolution of the Clinton self-control and cohesion in their apparatchik, he is revealing how shallow he is. To view those tears as any form of a break-down is childish.

Knowing how the Clintons operate, her “crying episode” is better explained this way:
The Clinton machine discovered that the woman vote was not only turned off by Hillary, but was eagerly moving toward Hussein Obama. The NH caucus was all about swaying the woman vote. So, Hillary stages a “woman moment” (she is as sexist as liberals are racist) and cries for an audience. But this was only half the plan. They knew NH lets just about anyone (even non-state residents) vote in their primaries, so they had already arranged for many supporters from surrounding states to move and and vote for her. Honestly, does anyone believe that the precincts in NH would be so ill prepared as to run out of ballots? They ran out because those precincts had a flood of voters in addition to the number they usually receive.

This little scheme enabled the headline stories to read: Hillary cries, shows softer side, proves she is a woman.
And
Hillary in stunning upset wins NH.

The two events are joined in the dull minds of the masses and they turn off the Soundbite Media believing the “female vote” (remember Slick Willy’s supposedly silly line about not being able to make her taller, younger, and male? let’s see how often we begin to hear the terms male and female in this campaign) has now firmly decided to back her.

Never underestimate the Clinton machine.

4 posted on 01/10/2008 5:16:10 AM PST by Ghost of Philip Marlowe (If Hillary is elected, her legacy will be telling the American people: Better put some ice on that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ghost of Philip Marlowe

second “argument” = article
countries = country’s

Need more coffee.


5 posted on 01/10/2008 5:19:04 AM PST by Ghost of Philip Marlowe (If Hillary is elected, her legacy will be telling the American people: Better put some ice on that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rellimpank

BTTT


6 posted on 01/10/2008 5:26:51 AM PST by varon (Allegiance to the constitution, always. Allegiance to a political party, never.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: webstersII
So what do the young Democrats want?

Like all new generations, they want to be unique. They don't want the choice their parents made, which in this case, is the Clintons.

7 posted on 01/10/2008 5:43:34 AM PST by randita (Do not trust any polls!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rellimpank

I sure as heck would not want to see her crack up! It is bad enough to see her face.


8 posted on 01/10/2008 7:24:46 AM PST by Piquaboy (22 year veteran of the Army, Air Force and Navy, Pray for all our military .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: webstersII
"So what do the young Democrats want? Even more liberalism and big gov’t?"

It looks that way, but they want someone younger to do it.

9 posted on 01/10/2008 8:20:21 AM PST by mass55th (Courage is being scared to death - but saddling up anyway~~John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: webstersII

Clinton is making a smart decision in regards to young voters. No use catering to them because they are starry-eyed for the new, young, kid Obama. Regardless, they don’t show up to the polls in great numbers.

Hillary is running a campaign to attract Dem stalwarts and enough independents (mostly women) to put her over.

If the GOP doesn’t get their stuff together soon, her strategy will win. If we have to go to a brokered convention, it is over- there will be too much infighting to overcome Hillary.


10 posted on 01/10/2008 9:11:11 AM PST by awake-n-angry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson