Posted on 01/09/2008 3:01:45 PM PST by jdm
Mitt Romney needs a win in the primaries soon, despite all of the rhetoric about delegate counts and second-place credibility. The Romney team apparently understands that, and have begun focusing their advertising on the upcoming Michigan primary -- and have put off other ad buys for the moment. The AP reports this as a sign of trouble:
Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney has decided to pull his advertising from South Carolina and Florida, in a sign of trouble for a campaign that badly needs a win. Romney had been hoping to challenge John McCain and Mike Huckabee in South Carolina, and Rudy Giuliani in Florida, where the former New York mayor has been spending time and money.
"We feel the best strategy is to focus our paid messaging in Michigan," Romney spokesman Kevin Madden said Wednesday.
The decision comes on the heels of back-to-back second-place finishes in Iowa and New Hampshire for the former Massachusetts governor. Romney, a multimillionaire who had used some of his own cash, had invested heavily in both states, counting on the two to give him the momentum toward the nomination.
Romney had been spending about $280,000 per week in South Carolina and spent $3 million there last year, according to rival campaigns. In Florida, he had been spending $160,000 per week and had spent 2.5 million in 2007.<.i>
Certainly, Romney needs a win in his native state. The schedule this year now plays against Romney, with 22 states all voting on February 5th and only three more opportunities to show he can win a race that's widely contested. In past cycles, significant primary voting stretched out through February and well into March. A candidate with lots of money could afford to keep placing second while others traded through first-place finishes and ran out of funds, although that would not be a first strategic option.
However, by February 6th, more than half of the nation will have cast their primary votes. With 22 states going on the same day, Romney doesn't have any opportunities to prove himself a winner after Florida in order to convince voters in these states to support him. Florida and South Carolina are not natural settings for a first win, and Romney's perceived advantages in Michigan puts a great deal of pressure on the campaign to score a big victory.
Let's not get too far out in predicting Romney's demise, however. He can self-fund for a while still, and so he will remain in the race. If he can't win Michigan, expect a huge ad blitz in the key February 5th states, including California and New York but probably focusing on the internal states. Holding off on South Carolina and Florida now allows him to conserve some of his funds for a much bigger effort focusing on winning enough Super Tuesday states to keep the campaign credible. Given the broad nature of these contests, Romney could easily score significant wins with an ad campaign that few if any of the other candidates can afford.
I don't see this as a panic move, but as a rational cost-benefit calculation and clear-eyed prioritization after a couple of significant setbacks. It's a smart move. In fact, it's basically the John McCain strategy for New Hampshire, transplanted to Michigan for Romney.
Meanwhile Rudy is increasing his ad exposure in Florida.
At this point it is hard to see him losing Florida.
I think Thompson and Romney need to gang up on Huck in the SC debate. Thompson needs to bring out those prosecutor skills and lay out a case on Huck’s enabling of bringing in illegal immigrants for Tyson and other Arkansas employers.
I don't see this as a panic move, but as a rational cost-benefit calculation and clear-eyed prioritization after a couple of significant setbacks. It's a smart move. In fact, it's basically the John McCain strategy for New Hampshire, transplanted to Michigan for Romney.It's been Fred's plan in South Carolina and Rudy's plan in Florida, too. Everyone will go into Super Tuesday with a win under their belt, and all will carry their party factions. And the convention will be brokered. And Fred and Mitt will join forces to produce a Thompson-Romney ticket.
But what is it losing out to? That's a mixed story: traditional boots-on--the-ground retail politics (good), and identity politics (bad, bad, bad).
We need to ramp up conservative education on the internet - and get our flavor of the internet to more "off-the-grid" demographics - to counter the rising socialist tide in the U.S.
I think the Huckster will be strong in SC . I hope Fred can beat him ...
New poll out today by Lansing, Michigan pollster:
Huckbee 23
Romney 22
McCain 18
And that’s AFTER Romney dropped $1 million in TV ads last month in Michigan, while Huck spent...zero.
Wyoming, but who cares about the Cowboy State
Besides that I think Rudy, Fred, Hunter, Paul need to win a primary more at this time then Mitt, Huck, or McCain do.
That is very good indeed.
Keep Mitt spending money. He can’t afford to do badly there.
I’ve heard that Hunter is doing okay in Nevada, but that was just heresay.
One would think that Nevada is strong for McCain.
A very interesting three weeks ahead, guys!
With the news that Romney pulled some ads in Fl and SC people act like Romney is hurting. But Romney raised 4million dollars yesterday, and came in second.
Some say weeping is good for a few percentage points. Maybe if he cried...?
That sounds so cold.
I’m not sure the strategy is sound. Independents will like slaughter Romney in favor of McCain.
I have the phone on “do not disturb” so no pollster called here. I’ve also been spreading the news that Huck’s a fake. Here’s hoping the voters here won’t fall for the con. (not holding my breath)
Name another candidate with as much broad based support as Rpmney? None of them do....they all have very narrow niches.
“As much broad-based support as Romney”?
Are you kidding? You mean broad-based SINGLE DIGIT support like this?
GALLUP this week:
Huckabee 25%
Giuliani 20
McCain 19
Thompson 12
Romney 9
Paul 4
“Name another candidate with as much broad based support as Romney.”
O.K.
Ron Paul and Duncan Hunter.
They’re the only other candidates who have about as much broad based support at Mitt Romney.
National polls are meaningless!
They are only used by people when the numbers favor their candidate.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.