Skip to comments.
MSNBC: Clinton Beats Obama in N.H. Democrat Primary (Fox also calls it for Clinton-Obama Concedes)
Jan. 8, 2008
Posted on 01/08/2008 7:32:20 PM PST by Aristotelian
In a stunning upset victory, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton beat Sen. Barack Obama in Tuesday's Democratic presidential primary election in New Hampshire.
TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: New Hampshire
KEYWORDS: hillary; missinglink; nh2008; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280, 281-300, 301-320, 321-327 next last
To: devere
Mrs.Clinton cut a deal with Bush Sr. and David Rockefeller in order to get the machines turned in her favor.
That was the fruit of their panic.
301
posted on
01/09/2008 9:48:17 AM PST
by
Siobhan
(God bless us one and all.)
To: TruthShallSetYouFree
Or, are you saying that, irrespective of polls, voters in an open caucus are more likely to vote for a black candidate so they will appear to be pro-diversity?Yes. Folks will say what sounds politically correct in public, but will be more likely to vote their hearts in a secret ballot. Compare, for example, the results in Dixville Notch, NH where a handful of folks vote just after midnight. With only 8 or so Democrat voters, there was no chance of a secret ballot, so it went 7 for the Black, 1 for the Hispanic. On the other hand, places with anonymous voting broke quite differently.
302
posted on
01/09/2008 10:05:01 AM PST
by
PAR35
To: nwrep
How could the polls be so wrong? And by that much? I dont get it.
Well, according to the BarkingMoonbats it's Diebold's fault. Seriously, check out
Cadillac Tight.
303
posted on
01/09/2008 10:13:51 AM PST
by
BJClinton
(How 'bout them Cowboys?)
To: Siobhan
“Mrs.Clinton cut a deal with Bush Sr. and David Rockefeller in order to get the machines turned in her favor.”
I’m always up for a good conspiracy theory, but New Hampshire uses paper ballots. In most of the state there is an optical scanning machine to read the paper ballot, but if any candidate suspected fraud they could demand a recount based on the original voter-marked paper. It seems to me that the Bradley ( Wilder ) effect is a much more likely explanation of what happened yesterday in New Hampshire, not secret signals from a 92 year old plutocrat.
304
posted on
01/09/2008 10:31:56 AM PST
by
devere
To: CitizenM
Ok, point taken. However my response was likely do to many on this forum disregarding ability of a candidate simply because they do not agree with him ideologically. I believe that is a mistake.
To: elfman2
306
posted on
01/09/2008 11:50:45 AM PST
by
Max in Utah
(A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within.)
To: nwrep
How could the polls be so wrong? And by that much? I dont get it.
=========================================
The Pollsters poisoned the Well by their mere act of testing the Voters and publishing the results prior to the close of Polling. Plus, a Simple Game Theory.
This is much simpler than believing that people were lying to the media or some kind of fraud theory.
People get bored when watching a game where one team is being killed, especially if they can switch to another channel to watch a game that is still exciting. The Media had spent the days before and the actual election day telling people what a waste of time it was for them to drive to the polls to vote for Obama as he was going to beat Hillary by 10+ points! During the actual election day, the Drive By Media and even Fox News conducted a public Funeral for Hillary!
NH is a state with lots of Independents and they simply tuned into the other channel, i.e. the Republican Primary, where the same media had told them how Mitt Romney had won the prior night's Fox TV debate.
The Independents evidently wanted to have an impact in the election if they bothered to go to the polls, and they did. They threw their previously dedicated Obama votes over to the Republican Primary and voted for McCain.
Simple but effective. They changed the outcome of BOTH elections.
RamS
307
posted on
01/09/2008 12:38:12 PM PST
by
RamingtonStall
(More Guns ==> Less Crime! Get your CHL today! http://www.ohioccw.org/)
To: Hegemony Cricket
*******Let not your heart be troubled - hilary is waaaayyyyy toooo unlikeable to ever win a national election.*******
I remember when Bush #1 was going to beat Klintoon. Yeah, right.
The Klintoons are very sharp. NH is a perfect example.
We Repubs better pick a great person; and it better not be McLame.
308
posted on
01/09/2008 1:31:10 PM PST
by
GOPologist
(When you can't find a path through the wilderness, make a new path.)
To: weston
*********I wont fall for this Hillary is easy to beat crap for one minute, because the minute we think it will be easy is the minute she wipes the floor with our asses.********
You betcha! Happened in 1948 when Dewey was a pushover. He pushed all right——right into the pee can.
309
posted on
01/09/2008 1:36:15 PM PST
by
GOPologist
(When you can't find a path through the wilderness, make a new path.)
To: GOPologist
"We Repubs better pick a great person; and it better not be McLame.
I certainly could not agree more with either of these statements - dead on right!
310
posted on
01/09/2008 1:36:28 PM PST
by
Hegemony Cricket
(Although most dead people vote democrat, aborted babies, if given the choice, would vote Republican.)
To: Lady Heron
What a great idea. That will show ‘em. You’ll really get your point across by staying home and pouting on election day. If enough Republicans do that because their guy doesn’t get the nomination, Democrats will not only take the highest office in the Executive Branch, but they’ll probably pick up a lot of seats in Congress and the Senate as well, making them extraordinarily powerful. They’ll get any judges they want confirmed. They’ll get whatever obnoxious legislation they want rubber stamped through both houses and not ever have to worry about a veto. It will be “great” and will all be thanks to people like you who get in a huff and want to pack up and go home and pout if their guy doesn’t get the nomination.
To all those who threaten to stay at home if Hunter or Thompson don’t get the nomination, I say good riddance. The Republican party does not need people like you. I suggest you go form your own party so you never have to settle for a candidate that is not your first choice. That way your principles will always stay intact. You’ll never get a candidate elected and therefore will have no real say in government, but at least you’ll have your principles.
311
posted on
01/09/2008 1:39:24 PM PST
by
TKDietz
To: Aristotelian
For Obama:
312
posted on
01/09/2008 1:40:11 PM PST
by
Lucky9teen
(When you blame others, you give up your power to change.)
To: Mitt Romney
Demos are not racist in this voting between a woman and a man.
Hillary would have beaten anyone in NH. Compare the two. Pick one.
Would you have voted for Obama?
313
posted on
01/09/2008 1:42:06 PM PST
by
GOPologist
(When you can't find a path through the wilderness, make a new path.)
To: TKDietz
I agree. Isn’t that what happened in the last election and then so many democrats got into Congress/Senate?
I say, go and vote for the best candidate on the ticket, even if it’s NOT who you ultimately want. What’s doing to happen is going to happen and IMO, everything happens for a reason.
Better to vote for the lesser of the evils, then to let the Democrats have it all. Unfortunate, but true.
314
posted on
01/09/2008 1:43:45 PM PST
by
Lucky9teen
(When you blame others, you give up your power to change.)
To: Aristotelian
315
posted on
01/09/2008 2:14:19 PM PST
by
Miss Didi
("Good heavens, woman, this is a war not a garden party!" Dr. Meade, Gone with the Wind)
To: Miss Didi
I continue to be very worried for the general election - I work at a large sw company. Overheard part of a converstation in the break room between 3 women, probably all in their early 30’s. I know 2 of them - very smart and good engineers.
Only heard part of their conversation but they were very sympathetic to that ‘attacks’ that HC was facing. Wow - vote for someone because you feel sorry for them????
Dont underestimated HC.
316
posted on
01/09/2008 2:34:12 PM PST
by
bob_esb
To: bob_esb
These women you overheard are young...they probably know nothing of Clinton Inc. Perhaps you could drop by their table with some coffee next time and enlighten them? Fear not...Mrs. Clinton has played the victim card so many times now, it will grow old. Count on it.
317
posted on
01/09/2008 2:43:17 PM PST
by
Miss Didi
("Good heavens, woman, this is a war not a garden party!" Dr. Meade, Gone with the Wind)
To: Miss Didi
RUSH: I mentioned before the break of the last hour that Mrs. Clinton's tears, the choked-up moment, was a little calculated -- and I believe this, using intelligence guided by experience. Nothing that happens with the Clintons is coincidence. But the night before the tearful moment, she appeared on Access Hollywood -- also part of the new strategy. She's appeared on Fox twice. She's sitting down doing interviews with people she used to give no time to whatsoever, and she was on Access Hollywood with the info babe Maria Menounos, and Menounos said, "You're not made of steel, are you? You have feelings." Now, remember: this is the night before the choked-up moment.
MRS. CLINTON: It's that difficult position that a woman candidate is in, because if you get too emotional, that undercuts you. A man can cry. We know that. Lots of our leaders have cried but, you know, a woman, that's a different kind of dynamic. You know, I may get a little passionate and carried away from the time, and maybe somebody says, "Well, you know, women shouldn't do that." Well, I disagree with that. It may take some getting used to because we haven't had a woman president, but, um, I'm confident that people are going to say, you know, "Wait a minute. I want a fighter in the White House."
RUSH: And the next day, after having set the stage the night before and sort of given away little hints here at the future, she has the choked-up moment. Been thinking about it. She was thinking about it before she did it. I wouldn't be surprised if she was rehearsed for this, or she had rehearsed. (cont.)
Why Mrs. Clinton's Tears Worked
318
posted on
01/09/2008 2:48:52 PM PST
by
Miss Didi
("Good heavens, woman, this is a war not a garden party!" Dr. Meade, Gone with the Wind)
To: NeoCaveman
319
posted on
01/09/2008 3:44:10 PM PST
by
IllumiNaughtyByNature
(To Err Is Human. To Arr is Pirate. To Unnngh! is Freeper.)
To: farlander
hes more on the order of Phil, the prince of insufficient light. LOL!
320
posted on
01/10/2008 3:04:38 AM PST
by
livius
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280, 281-300, 301-320, 321-327 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson