Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FairTax Flaws
WSJ ^ | January 8, 2008 | By JERRY BOWYER

Posted on 01/08/2008 4:34:14 AM PST by xcamel

If talk show hosts ran the world, we'd have a national sales tax. We'd have no immigration, and we would have long ago carpet-bombed the entire Middle East. We'd also have something called "fair trade," which means no real trade at all.

But they don't run the world; they just pretend that if they did, everything would be great. I would be a lot more confident that this was true if I didn't know so many talk show hosts. I would be even more confident if they had really run anything of consequence before. But I do, and they haven't.

I mention this because last week Mike Huckabee won the Iowa caucus partly on a movement incubated in large part on radio talk shows: the FairTax. If words were deeds, then life would be great. We could simply declare that by switching from a federal income tax to a national retail sales tax, tax cheating would end, code complexity would be a thing of the past, and illegal immigrants would start paying taxes. And, of course, we'd switch into high economic growth -- forever.

The problem is that none of this would happen. People would simply switch from cheating on income taxes to cheating on sales taxes.

Small vendors often fail to withhold sales taxes. Buyers cheat on sales taxes now. They often fail to pay taxes on interstate catalogue sales. They buy some goods in black markets.

This doesn't happen much because sales taxes are much lower than income taxes, but if that were reversed, consumers would cheat more. Look at cigarettes. Organized crime sells smokes on the black market in jurisdictions that impose high cigarette taxes.

There is a large category of economic activity designed to avoid sales taxes -- it's called smuggling.

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Government; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: fairtax; flaws
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 361-363 next last
Have at it..
1 posted on 01/08/2008 4:34:15 AM PST by xcamel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: xcamel

Listen to the talkmaster respond at 8:30am EST at http://wsbradio.com/ (Neal Boortz)


2 posted on 01/08/2008 4:36:08 AM PST by Perdogg (Fred Thompson - John Bolton 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xcamel

Have YOU read the book or the House and Senate Bills?


3 posted on 01/08/2008 4:39:06 AM PST by Joe Marine 76 (USA for USA CITIZENS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xcamel
Oh, so if someone might figure out how to cheat then its a bad idea. Got it. Well, we might as well close down the govt right now and just forget about it all, because there isnt one law made that hasnt or couldnt be broken or cheated.

Pretty weak initial argument. A good writer usually leads with the strong stuff and then gets into the nit picky arguments after he has your attention. This one leads with a popcorn fart. The rest of the column must be riveting!

4 posted on 01/08/2008 4:40:09 AM PST by Michael Knight (Young loner in a dangerous world of liberals who operate above the law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xcamel

PS, I dont have any problems with the other two ideas either (no immigration and carpet bombing middle east). We need to explore that further...


5 posted on 01/08/2008 4:41:36 AM PST by Michael Knight (Young loner in a dangerous world of liberals who operate above the law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

I listen to Neal, and I wish people would listen to his message more.

The FairTax is not intended to be a way to reduce taxes, IT IS A WAY TO REDUCES POLITICIANS’POWER AND INFLUENCE IN OUR LIVES.

The ability to alter the tax code, is the ability to influence our behavior and maintain control.

It is much harder for a Democrat to raise taxes if it isn’t hidden in some anonymous bill, to the advantage of some PAID LOBBYIST, for YOU TO PAY FOR.


6 posted on 01/08/2008 4:53:09 AM PST by RangerM (Jesus was likely a very good carpenter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Michael Knight
Placing the words "fair" and "tax" in close juxtaposition is oxymoronic.

Insisting that it is 23% instead of its actual ~30% rate is quite unhelpful in asserting it is at all "fair", or significantly attractive.

7 posted on 01/08/2008 4:55:33 AM PST by Paladin2 (Huma for co-president!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

It is not an “actual 30%.”

Read the book.


8 posted on 01/08/2008 5:08:00 AM PST by Adder (hialb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Your Nightmare; Always Right; lewislynn; lucysmom; robertpaulsen; longtermmemmory; camle; ...

FYI


9 posted on 01/08/2008 5:12:11 AM PST by xcamel (FDT/2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xcamel

Negatives of the Fair Tax vs. the IRS run Income Tax. So far you haven’t even woke the scale up!


10 posted on 01/08/2008 5:13:43 AM PST by Dixie Yooper (Ephesians 6:11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Adder
I can use math. It's 30%.

The US would be better off if we eliminated the Income Tax and legalized drugs and put a tariff on imported drugs. That way the Feds would have to control the border to get their dough.

11 posted on 01/08/2008 5:14:23 AM PST by Paladin2 (Huma for co-president!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

You have to remove the embedded taxes from the item first....that lowers the initial cost then the sales tax goes on top.

It is not 30%.

The other upside is you get your full paycheck...no deductions.

You basicly determine how much tax you pay by how much you buy. And you are rebated a set amount for “necessities” each month....meaning the “poor” still end up not paying taxes...a downside for me.

I think its worth exploring.


12 posted on 01/08/2008 5:18:00 AM PST by Adder (hialb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: xcamel
The problem is that none of this would happen. People would simply switch from cheating on income taxes to cheating on sales taxes.

What the article fails to mention is that under the FairTax, it requires the collusion of at least two people to cheat the system each time a cheat is attempted. The sales manager of a retail outlet would have to adjust the price in order to accomplish a money collection cheat, but, in order to accomplish this, the distributor providing the product for sale would also have to alter their own inventory reports to cover for the sales manager. The sales manager cannot do it alone.

In a like manner, if a consumer didn't want to pay the tax, they would need the help of the sales manager to cover it up. The consumer cannot do it alone.

I'm not saying that it would be a crime-free tax system, but committing the crime would take more effort than under the current income tax system and that effort would probably not be worth it, especially if caught.
13 posted on 01/08/2008 5:23:28 AM PST by 84rules ( Ooh-Rah! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Adder; Paladin2
It’s already been established that “embedded taxes” are only about 1/5 of what Boortz and Co have claimed... next answer please...
14 posted on 01/08/2008 5:24:01 AM PST by xcamel (FDT/2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Joe Marine 76

Which version? I think there are 4 out and one more due shortly... that should tell you something...


15 posted on 01/08/2008 5:25:00 AM PST by xcamel (FDT/2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Adder
It is not an “actual 30%.”

You are absolutely right, it is 29.87%

16 posted on 01/08/2008 5:33:11 AM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Adder
You have to remove the embedded taxes from the item first....that lowers the initial cost then the sales tax goes on top.

Well since you get to keep you full paycheck, those embedded taxes are still mostly in the product. Listen to the guy who did the fairtax study.

17 posted on 01/08/2008 5:34:57 AM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Adder
The other upside is you get your full paycheck...no deductions.

The part that always gets left out is that your paycheck will be reduced by around 30%. It might be reduced a bit less than that, but pretty close.

I haven't really decided if I like the fair tax or not (and I have read the book).

18 posted on 01/08/2008 5:35:29 AM PST by 6ppc (It's torch and pitchfork time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

So what happens when we can’t pay for everything with a Fair Tax? Then we’ll have a national sales tax and they’ll try to stick the income tax on top of that.

No thanks.


19 posted on 01/08/2008 5:35:56 AM PST by GeorgiaDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: xcamel

There is really only ONE Fair Tax. Compute the amount of the federal budget, divide it by the total number of people in the US. Each person pays that amount (parents are responsible for paying for their minor children). If you can’t pay your part, you don’t vote.

I guarantee that spending will go down and everyone’s tax burden will go down.


20 posted on 01/08/2008 5:37:02 AM PST by Bob Buchholz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 361-363 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson