To: Jay777
Wait...wait..Mitt is the most pro-life candidate in the race. He said so himself. How could they endorse Fred? < /sarcasm>
U.S. Army Retired |
7 posted on
01/04/2008 4:32:51 PM PST by
big'ol_freeper
("You can compromise your principals if you choose to, just don't ask me to compromise mine."~Rush)
To: big'ol_freeper
A comment to me (and others, repeated many times) on last night's Iowa live thread by a Huckster supporter:
For me, the *first criteria* is that a candidate is Christian. Thompson has failed that criteria with me. Then after seeing that a candidate is Christian (which would have to be someone other than Thompson), then one can get into the political matters... Regards,
34 posted on
01/04/2008 5:24:51 PM PST by
CedarDave
(The only access Hillary-care will bring is access to a waiting list.)
To: big'ol_freeper
Actually that is a legitmate question. What has Fred Thompson authored positively to protect the unborn in all 50 states? It’s a real question.
70 posted on
01/04/2008 6:08:30 PM PST by
Lexinom
(Build the fence and call China to account. GoHunter08.com)
To: big'ol_freeper
I am hoping Fred will come in 2nd in NH.
If Fred can take Wyoming, it might give him a boast going into NH and SC.
To: big'ol_freeper
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson