[AmericanInTokyo]

Do I detect a contradiction?

1. "Duncan Hunter is going nowhere, he is pulling no votes, he is not a factor, he should give it up, he is a non-entity."

2. "Duncan Hunter must pull out. He is "pulling votes" (sic) from Fred."

Which one is it?

You are contradicting yourself.

If Hunter has no impact, then why would his dropping out have anything to do with bettering Fred Thompson's chances?

Can't you come up with something more machiavellian than that? Give it a try!

Such as telling us what we get from Fred Thompson as political barter, if we pulled out.

[Candor7]

Hai! So desu.

Duncanu Hunteru Samma ichi ban san desu!

Onagaishimasu!

[MinuteGal]

You know what I'm talking about. It's too late to be teaching Politics 101 to die-hards with blinders and ear plugs securely fastened.

Leni