Skip to comments.
Iowa Caucuses - Results Live Thread
January 3, 2008
| xjcsa
Posted on 01/03/2008 12:08:45 PM PST by xjcsa
Edited on 01/03/2008 7:30:11 PM PST by Admin Moderator.
[history]
I thought the time was right to start up a live thread for results and comments about tonight, so here we are!
TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Iowa
KEYWORDS: 2008; biden; caucus; caucuses; dodd; edwards; elections; fred; fredthompson; giuliani; gravel; hillary; huckabee; hunter; ia2008; iowa; keyes; kucinich; livethread; mccain; mikehuckabee; obama; paul; richardson; romney; thompson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 781-800, 801-820, 821-840 ... 3,221-3,230 next last
To: xjcsa
Oh Lord, that we could only be free of the “Clinton Sleaze”. Liberalism is bad enough in a candidate, but when you add sleaze to it, it’s just about gagworthy.
801
posted on
01/03/2008 5:31:04 PM PST
by
Twinkie
(Faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the Word of God . . .)
To: TornadoAlley3
I cannot imagine people showing up undecided and allowing these people to tell them who to vote for. Strangest thing I've ever seen. And I've seen a lot of strange things.
To: Petronski
Fox entrance polls have it strong for Huckabust.
803
posted on
01/03/2008 5:31:12 PM PST
by
Vision
(Thompson/Hunter '08)
To: Heartofsong83
I can believe Edwards winning. These people in Iowa are total morons with not a clue how a capitalist economy works.
So to protect themselves from evil “special interests” they are want a President who is a member of the largest, wealthiest special interest group, the Trial Lawyers?
804
posted on
01/03/2008 5:31:24 PM PST
by
MNJohnnie
(Hillary Clinton has never done one thing right. She thinks that qualifies her to be President?)
To: NewHampshireDuo
Far more than expected are showing up. I predict an unexpected outcome tonight. I found out earlier that ALL pollsters know one fact... 50% of those polled in Iowa that claim to caucus... NEVER show up. Polling in this case means nothing... Republican turnout was to be far below past elections... it appears to be on track for a record Republican turnout!
LLS
805
posted on
01/03/2008 5:31:26 PM PST
by
LibLieSlayer
(Support America, Kill terrorists, Destroy dims and vote Fred!)
To: fanfan
That's the way
Uh, Huh!
Uh, Huh!
I like it!
Uh, Huh! Uh, Huh! Uh, Huh!
806
posted on
01/03/2008 5:31:29 PM PST
by
null and void
(To anger a conservative, lie to him. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth. - M203M4)
To: chad_in_georgia
I can’t decide but I think I hate Hillary more. Edwards just seems like such a loud mouthed light weight. Hill is dangerous.
To: toomanygrasshoppers
Yet if you are disabled, fighting a war, have to work nights, you don’t get to participate.
808
posted on
01/03/2008 5:31:45 PM PST
by
TornadoAlley3
( UNITED BY OUR CORE BELIEFS Fred08)
To: dan1123
Osama 34%
Hillary 27%
Sissy boy 23%
per fox news at 8:30 PM est
Huck 33%
Romney 23% at the same time.
To: cajungirl
“Reminds me of the recount and my inability to look away.”
I was recuperating from surgery during the recount. Watched TV day and night until the election was called for W.
We had a power outage the day Gore gave his concession speech and W gave his acceptance speech.
I was so desperate to see the speeches, I went to Best Buy (located in a part of town not hit by the outage) to watch them. The TV aisle at Best Buy was crowded with other political junkies who had to see the speeches, too.
810
posted on
01/03/2008 5:32:00 PM PST
by
freedom4me
(Courage is fear holding on a minute longer. --Gen. George Patton)
To: Jet Jaguar
If that holds, I have to thank Fox for playing McCain up all day.
811
posted on
01/03/2008 5:32:16 PM PST
by
Petronski
(Willard Myth Romney: 51% negatives)
To: chad_in_georgia
I am watching C-Span 2, Republican caucus at a college, and see no people wearing candidate T-shirts. Maybe they are not allowed??? Wierd! GO FRED!
To: NewHampshireDuo
The Rebups don’t cacaus till later in the evening
813
posted on
01/03/2008 5:32:28 PM PST
by
mylife
(The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
To: Pittsburgher
Incredible, isnt it, how the network we used to consider indispensible has become reviled? With that Saudi sheik now having effective control, I don't bother (The Saudi has about 5%, but that's the margin that Murdoch needs the retain control, so Murdoch dances when told)
To: Jet Jaguar
Well exit polls being as accurate as they are do we figure entrance ones would be any better ?
815
posted on
01/03/2008 5:32:33 PM PST
by
festus
(Fred Thompson '08)
To: LibLieSlayer
Guess it’s time to start paying attention. But, the Dems on CSPAN 1 are funny.
816
posted on
01/03/2008 5:32:34 PM PST
by
NewHampshireDuo
(Earth - Taking care of itself since 4.6 billion BC)
To: Armedanddangerous
Those are entrance poll numbers.
817
posted on
01/03/2008 5:32:37 PM PST
by
Vision
(Thompson/Hunter '08)
To: LibLieSlayer
That may indeed be a very good thing... When I see the phrase “likely caucus goers” I sit back and wonder who in the world they are polling. I don’t but any stock in any poll frankly. Too hard to get a real unbiased result.
To: cajungirl
Hey, cajungirl!
There is nothing to like about Hillary. At least Edwards has great hair. :)
819
posted on
01/03/2008 5:33:07 PM PST
by
maggief
To: mylife
CNN started posting results..
1. Romney
2. Huck (may have Huck and Romney swapped, they had it up too quickly)
3. Thompson
4. McCain
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 781-800, 801-820, 821-840 ... 3,221-3,230 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson