Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Late-Breaking Surge for Thompson
National Review Online ^ | 2 January 2008 | Peter Robinson

Posted on 01/02/2008 3:09:35 PM PST by big'ol_freeper

The latest news from Iowa? According to Zogby’s latest—and I quote: “Sen. Fred Thompson…has seen a late-breaking surge.” (Rich notes the same poll below.)

What’s going on here? My guess is that there are whole lot of Iowa Republicans who have about the same attitude that David Limbaugh displayed in his column yesterday:

Fred is the only [candidate] I don't have major reservations about….I find his lack of "fire in the belly" refreshing. He strikes me as one of the few presidential candidates since Ronald Reagan whose primary motivation is not personal aggrandizement but rather serving and leading the nation in very troubled and dangerous times. I see him as almost being drafted into this project, and his refusal to drool publicly over the prospect of becoming the most powerful man in the world is positively delightful.

(Excerpt) Read more at corner.nationalreview.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Politics/Elections; US: Iowa
KEYWORDS: election; electionpresident; elections; fred; fredthompson; ia2008; iowa; iowavotefred; primaries; primary; thenextpresident; thompson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 581-590 next last
To: Mensius
The source document is on Mitt's desk right beside his NRA endorsement.

Whew! I thought Kinko's was never going to get it delivered in time!

241 posted on 01/02/2008 4:55:11 PM PST by ApplegateRanch (If God didn't want a Liberal/RINO hanging from every tree, He wouldn't have created so much rope!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: counterpunch

“The point is Fred’s running his campaign like someone involved really really wants to lose what should have been a sure thing.”

yep


242 posted on 01/02/2008 4:55:30 PM PST by Checkers (First they came for the Mormons, but I said nothing because I was not Mormon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies]

To: Checkers

Nope.


243 posted on 01/02/2008 4:57:00 PM PST by Cedric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies]

To: counterpunch
I simply speak the truth. [and you just did it again]

You never say anything even vaguely positive about Fred without wrapping it in a slam. So continue on with the game, but don't think anyone is buying it.

244 posted on 01/02/2008 4:57:18 PM PST by Route66 (America's Main Street - - - Fred D. Thompson / Consistent Conservative...The One with Gravitas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 231 | View Replies]

To: brothers4thID

You know, I couldn’t do any worse than Fred’s campaign manager...


245 posted on 01/02/2008 4:57:41 PM PST by counterpunch (ABH - Anybody But Huckabee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 239 | View Replies]

To: Checkers

shoo.


246 posted on 01/02/2008 4:58:29 PM PST by Honeybunch ("Words are, of course, the most powerful drug used by mankind." ~Rudyard Kipling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies]

To: Route66

Well said!


247 posted on 01/02/2008 4:59:03 PM PST by greyfoxx39 (Mitt willingly gives up his personal freedoms to his church..why would he protect YOURS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies]

To: Route66

“You never say anything even vaguely positive about Fred without wrapping it in a slam. “

Someone has a different opinion about Fred.

What a concept.


248 posted on 01/02/2008 4:59:16 PM PST by Checkers (First they came for the Mormons, but I said nothing because I was not Mormon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 244 | View Replies]

To: Route66

I will continue to slam Fred’s campaign until he turns it around and makes it about national security and his immaculate credentials. I will continue to call everyone involved in his campaign out for being a fool for not. Especially when they’ve watch their candidate tank. It’s time for a new campaign theme, Fred.


249 posted on 01/02/2008 4:59:50 PM PST by counterpunch (ABH - Anybody But Huckabee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 244 | View Replies]

To: counterpunch

Be sure to post the number of winning political campaigns you’ve won on your resume.

Scratch that, be sure to list how many campaigns you’ve ever actually worked in, win or lose.


250 posted on 01/02/2008 4:59:56 PM PST by brothers4thID (Fred Thompson for President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 245 | View Replies]

To: Squidpup

I’m thinking a Thompson/Hunter or Thompson/Sanford ticket would be a powerful one.

Semper Fi,


251 posted on 01/02/2008 5:00:03 PM PST by 2nd Bn, 11th Mar (The "P" in Democrat stands for patriotism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: counterpunch

“You know, I couldn’t do any worse than Fred’s campaign manager...”

WHO is Fred!!’s campaign manager anyway?


252 posted on 01/02/2008 5:00:52 PM PST by Checkers (First they came for the Mormons, but I said nothing because I was not Mormon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 245 | View Replies]

To: big'ol_freeper

Surge for Fred? I pray that this is so.


253 posted on 01/02/2008 5:01:30 PM PST by eleni121 (+ En Touto Nika! By this sign conquer! + Constantine the Great)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tossup
Fred said he will quit if not placing in top two.


Fred said no such thing.
Begone, Troll !
254 posted on 01/02/2008 5:01:32 PM PST by pyx (Rule#1.The LEFT lies.Rule#2.See Rule#1. IF THE LEFT CONTROLS THE LANGUAGE, IT CONTROLS THE ARGUMENT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: counterpunch

The only poll I know of for today is the Zogby poll mentioned in the article.

Thompson 8 10 12
McCain 13 12 12

Yes, they are tied for the moment. But if you look at the direction of movement and couple in the swarm of calls to the Thompson HQ today after Limbaugh blasted Huckabee and McCain, I suspect that third is going to be very solid tomorrow.


255 posted on 01/02/2008 5:01:32 PM PST by Ingtar (The LDS problem that Romney is facing is not his religion, but his recent Liberal Definitive Stands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 236 | View Replies]

To: Blue Highway; Tossup
Is a new Huckles supporter?

Probably.

How can you support someone with the flip flopping of late.

Without JF'nK to support on the Dem's side, he had to find another flopping smelly fish to promote.

His name gives a clue, too:

Not much difference between a tossup, upchuck, and Mikey Hackenchuck.

256 posted on 01/02/2008 5:02:40 PM PST by ApplegateRanch (If God didn't want a Liberal/RINO hanging from every tree, He wouldn't have created so much rope!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: brothers4thID; big'ol_freeper

Why, looky here! We now have dueling disruptors on your thread tossing the ball back and forth. What fun!


257 posted on 01/02/2008 5:05:35 PM PST by greyfoxx39 (Mitt willingly gives up his personal freedoms to his church..why would he protect YOURS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 250 | View Replies]

To: big'ol_freeper

I think the polling is useless, since so many have not made up their minds. Romney or Huckabee at 20 or 30% is meaningless when their percentages are of 50% or fewer of the voters.


258 posted on 01/02/2008 5:05:37 PM PST by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: counterpunch
"The fact that Fred has not made this the central issue in his campaign is what stands out. The fct that Fred has kept his national security credentials the best kept secret of the entire campaign season is what stands out. It stands out as evidence of the most incompetently run campaign in modern American history. It stands out as how the natural front-runner can sabotage his own campaign so bad that he winds up in last place."

Last place? go back to some more delusional thinking, I suppose Ron Paul will win with that kind of logic.

259 posted on 01/02/2008 5:06:08 PM PST by #1CTYankee (That's right, I have no proof. So what of it??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies]

To: WFTR

I noted to one”zealous” Fred supporter that he must hate Fred..His alienating comments have not made me change my support of Fred, however..I will not be voting for some of Fred’s unpleasant supporters..just Fred.


260 posted on 01/02/2008 5:08:19 PM PST by MEG33 (GOD BLESS OUR ARMED FORCES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 581-590 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson