Posted on 12/31/2007 9:56:59 PM PST by digger48
Last weekend after returning to my office from the television studios of a major network where I had done a brief segment on the security of Pakistan's nuclear weapons, I turned on CNN to watch their coverage of the Bhutto assassination's aftermath.
Sen. Hillary Clinton was telling Wolf Blitzer that she didn't think "the Pakistani government at this time under President Musharraf has any credibility at all."
She then said something that betrayed a serious lack of knowledge about Pakistan and called her own credibility on the subject into serious question.
"If President Musharraf wishes to stand for election," she told Blitzer, "then he should abide by the same rules that every other candidate will have to follow."
My immediate reaction was: "Did I hear that correctly?"
As a Pakistan analyst, I know for a fact that Pervez Musharraf doesn't wish to stand for election any time soon.
The upcoming elections are for the next parliament. Musharraf was just elected president of Pakistan, overwhelmingly, by popularly elected electors on Oct. 6. He's just begun his five-year term as the president of the country. Why would he ever want to run for one seat in parliament? It wouldn't make sense.
However, I checked the transcript of the interview later. That's exactly what she said.
My next reaction was: "Maybe she misspoke. Candidates do a lot of interviews. Not every sentence comes out the way they want it to."
After all, Sen. Clinton is a candidate who is running claiming big-time foreign policy knowledge and experience that she says her closest opponents in the Democratic Primary don't have.
Pakistan? A nuclear power? A front-line ally in the war on terror? A country that's been in the news an awful lot in the past few months? "C'mon," I told myself. "A candidate with all of those advisors has got to know at least the basics about Pakistan's political system."
No such luck.
Sunday morning, ABC's This Week ran an interview George Stephanopoulos had done with Sen. Clinton on Friday.
The interview produced this gem:
Referring to a possible delay in the elections, Sen. Clinton said: "I think it will be very difficult to have a real election. You know, Nawaz Sharif (leader of the PML-N, an opposition party) has said he's not going to compete. The PPP is in disarray with Benazir's assassination. He (President Pervez Musharraf) could be the only person on the ballot. I don't think that's a real election."
And then it hit me:
Sen. Clinton really didn't know that the upcoming elections were for individual seats in Pakistan's parliament. She actually believed that Bhutto, Nawaz and Musharraf would be facing off as individual candidates for leadership of the country in the upcoming elections.
Sen. Clinton didn't know that Nawaz Sharif isn't allowed to run for office in Pakistan because of a felony conviction. She didn't know that President Musharraf won't be on the ballot because he's already been elected.
Sen. Clinton, a candidate for the leadership of the free world, apparently doesn't know the first thing about the country referred to by some as "the most dangerous place on earth."
--
Thomas Houlahan is the director of the Military Assessment Program at the Center for Security and Science.
Unfortunately her handlers didn’t have time to VETT nor Poll the Subject of Elections in Pakistan so she didn’t have a Clue....Of Course.!
Just like he Claim A Bortions Make them SAFE Legal and Rare.. How does Killing an Unborn ever make it Safe The Baby is Ripped apart limb by Limb! Sheeeez
Or who killed Vince Foster.
This will undoubtedly be reported as widely as Bush's gaffe in 2000 when he did not know Musharraf's name.
This author better get ready—flying lamps are in the forecast.
Great analysis of how dumb Cankles really is.
She’s such a poser.
Assuming that's not a rhetorical question, about as credible as she is on everything else, NOT.
Senator Clinton has yet again been found VERY wanting.
I'm going back to bed.
They won’t. They won’t have to. The MSM will give her a pass on this as they do everything else.
But that won't stop her from shooting her big mouth off and throwing gas on the fire.
Anyone running for President who doesn't have someone on their staff monitoring FreeRepublic is too stupid to be given consideration for the office.
ML/NJ
Poor little Burglar, no room there to stuff secret documents!!
Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton was praised in the wake of the assassination of former Pakistani Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto for demonstrating her command of the players and the issues at stake in Pakistan, even as another candidate, former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee, was criticized for stumbling over details.
But in two confident television appearances, on CNN and ABC, Clinton made an elementary error about Pakistani politics: She described President Pervez Musharraf as a “candidate” who would be “on the ballot.”
In fact, Musharraf was reelected to the presidency in October. The upcoming elections are for parliament, and while Musharraf’s party will be facing off against opposition parties, the president himself is not a candidate.
“He will NOT be on the ballot,”
http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0108/Clinton_errs_on_Pakistan_.html
but Bill told us she was a ‘genius’
Hillary has no interest in foreign policy. She intends to focus on what she believes to be the real purpose of government—weatlth redistribution.
I hope every man in America sees her exactly like that.
Just let her keep talking. It’s the biggest deficit the “Smartest Woman in the World” has. (but far from the only one)
True....
Dicktater envy? ;^)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.