Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Getting the Story Straight (Fred corrects MSM)
Red State ^ | Fred Thompson

Posted on 12/30/2007 10:31:17 AM PST by Sir Gawain

Getting the Story Straight

By Fred Thompson

Every once in a while I am more thankful than ever for today’s technology which allows me to talk to you directly instead of having to go through the filter of the main stream media.

Some of them are intent on making the outcome of the campaign dependent upon their pre-conceived notions. Every once in a while their incomplete and slanted coverage makes this clear.

Today I had this story written about me regarding what I said at a Town Hall event in Burlington, Iowa by a reporter who wasn’t even at the event. Incidentally, I declined to be interviewed by this particular reporter yesterday for reasons which will soon be apparent.

In referring to me, she reported “he doesn’t like modern campaigning, isn’t interested in running for President, and will not be devastated” if he doesn’t win.

Below is a transcript of what I actually said in response to a question by a local Burlington resident which was the basis of the reporter’s story.

It is clear that there are those in the media who will exact a high price for candor and from those whom they consider to be insufficiently ambitious. But it is with increasing amazement that we see that those who are willing to slant or leave out important parts of a story to make their point.

If a candidate succumbs to this he will be reduced to nothing more than a sound bite machine.

As for me I am going to continue to say exactly what is in my heart and is on my mind and give straight and honest answers to those who ask straight and honest questions.

Incidentally, the audience in Burlington broke into applause in the middle of my answer. The reporter wouldn’t know that because she wasn’t even there.

The transcript is below the fold . . .

Q: (Courtesy ABC News) My only problem with you and why I haven’t thrown all my support behind you is that I don’t know if you have the desire to be President. If I caucus for you next week, are you still going to be there two months from now?

That is a very good question, not because it’s difficult to answer, but I’m gonna answer it in a little different way than what you might expect.

In the first place, I got into the race about the time people normally get into get into it. The fact of the matter is people get into it a lot earlier than they used to. For some of them, they were juniors in high school.

The first place, I wouldn’t be here if I didn’t. I wouldn’t be doing this. I grew up in very modest circumstances. I left government and I and my family have made sacrifices to be sitting here today. I haven’t had any income for a long time because I figured to be clean, you’ve got to cut everything off. I was doing speaking engagements and I had a contract to do a tv show. I had a contract with abc radio…and so forth. A man would have to be a total fool to do all those things and to be leaving his family which is not a joyful thing if he didn’’t want to do it.

I am not consumed by personal ambition. I will not be devastated if I don’t do it. I want the people to have the best president they can have.

When this talk first originated from people around the country both directly and through polls, liked the idea of me stepping up and of course, you always look better form a distance.

But most of those people are still there. I approached it from the standpoint of a deal. A kind of a marriage. If one side of a marriage really has to be talked into the marriage, it probably ain’t going to be a good deal. But if you mutually decide it’s going to be a good thing. In this case, if you think this is a good thing for the country, then we have an opportunity to do some wonderful things together.

I’m offering myself up. I’m saying that I have the background, the capability and concern to do this and do it for the right reasons. I’m not particularly interested in running for president, but I think I’d make a good president.

Nowadays, the process has become much more important than it used to be.

I don’t know that they ever asked George Washington a question like this. I don’t know that they ever asked Dwight D. Eisenhower a question like this. But nowadays, it’s all about fire in the belly. I’m not sure in the world we live in today it’s a good thing if a president has too much fire in the belly. I approach life differently than a lot of people. People, I guess, wonder how I’ve been as successful as I’ve been in everything that I’ve done. I won two races in TN by 20 point margins in a state that bill Clinton carried twice. I’ve never had an acting lesson. I guess that’s obvious by people who’ve watched me…

When I did it, I did it. Wasn’t just a lark. Anything that’s worth doing is worth doing well. But I’ve always been a little more laid back than most. I’m only consumed by very, very few things. Politics is not one of them. The welfare of our country and our kids and grandkids is one of them.

If people really want in their president super type-a personality, someone who has gotten up every morning and gone to bed every night and been thinking about for years how they win the presidency of the united states, someone who can look you straight in the eye and say they enjoy every minute of campaigning, I ain’t that guy. So I hope I’ve discussed that and didn’t talk you out of anything. I honestly want – I can’t imagine a worse set of circumstances [than] achieving the Presidency of the United States under false pretenses. I go out of my way to be myself.



TOPICS: Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: fredthompson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last
To: Sir Gawain
"Listen to me now and hear me later - there is no fire in that belly! I heard it from the American media..."
41 posted on 12/30/2007 12:13:39 PM PST by Caipirabob (Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain

"Listen to me now and hear me later - there is no fire in that belly! I heard it from the American media..."

42 posted on 12/30/2007 12:14:01 PM PST by Caipirabob (Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JennysCool
Great Picture!

First I though it was J.R. Ewing (Larry Hagman)

Go Fred, go.....

43 posted on 12/30/2007 12:15:34 PM PST by Churchillspirit (We are all foot soldiers in this War On Terror.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain

No one knows how to react to clear and honest talk from a politician.


44 posted on 12/30/2007 12:26:40 PM PST by SE Mom (Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JennysCool

You know that cowboy hat is gonna just drive the Loony Left even loonier!


45 posted on 12/30/2007 12:32:24 PM PST by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain
I try to apply a Heinleinian 'axiom'.

The greater the zeal to hold public office, the more likely the candidate is mentally unfit to hold it, regardless of apparent qualifications

Cases in point are abundant in the House & Senate...and in the Clinton Crime Family

46 posted on 12/30/2007 12:32:28 PM PST by ApplegateRanch (If God didn't want a Liberal/RINO hanging from every tree, He wouldn't have created so much rope!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Ewwww Jill Lawrence - failed reporter - has a striking resemblance to very young Helen Thomas.

Similar temperment it would seem.

Is there a new cloned variety of angry white woman emerging from the liberal laboratories?


47 posted on 12/30/2007 12:35:29 PM PST by imintrouble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain
See, this is what I don't understand. The flow of information is no longer uni-directional. There are more fact checkers out there than ever before. The quality control of the drive-by-media practitioners has never been high. Now the quality checkers are swarming around the Jills of this world, and the putrid product they produce looks less and less appetizing the longer it's examined. They claim to have "fact checkers" and, in fact, disdain the blogosphere for not having them. So why do the "fact checkers" (the MSM QC people) let this sort of junk get published? The answer is simple, really, the fact checkers are as clueless as the Jills of the world. The sort of idiocy that Jill wrote would strike a reasonable person as highly suspect and worth checking out. But to the sort of people who "fact check" this trash, given their ideological homogeneity, this sort of thing is, to their mind, "natural," coming from a Conservative. To them, conservatism is uncharted territory and they have no feel for what real conservatives say or do.
48 posted on 12/30/2007 12:49:18 PM PST by moneyrunner (I have not flattered its rank breath, nor bowed to its idolatries a patient knee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain

bttt


49 posted on 12/30/2007 1:13:13 PM PST by petercooper ("Daisy-cutters trump a wiretap anytime." - Nicole Gelinas - 02-10-04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain

Sounds like the useful idiots are getting desparate, don’t it.


50 posted on 12/30/2007 1:14:34 PM PST by Waco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Waco

There is good in this. The fact that the leftstream media are starting to lie about Fred and distort his message suggests that they have reason to believe that their previous tactic of ignoring him completely, isn’t working.


51 posted on 12/30/2007 1:21:12 PM PST by Hunton Peck (Fred. 'Nuf said.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Yaelle

“Bill Clinton’s “fire in the belly” ended up on Monica’s dress.”

You really had to go there didn’t you? I now have to shower to wash off the stench. :)


52 posted on 12/30/2007 1:48:18 PM PST by EQAndyBuzz (Hunter Thompson in 08.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: aruanan
Did you see her "Jill Lawrence page"?

What exactly did you see, and what did you want to see?

53 posted on 12/30/2007 3:04:03 PM PST by an amused spectator (AGW: If you drag a hundred dollar bill through a research lab, you never know what you'll find)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Churchillspirit
I always though Mike Huckabee looked like the disgraced President Charles Logan on the series “24.” Am I the only one that sees the physical resemblance?
54 posted on 12/30/2007 3:05:19 PM PST by LachlanMinnesota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Rick_Michael

Indeed.

Rockon Fred !


55 posted on 12/30/2007 3:09:28 PM PST by festus (Fred Thompson '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt

“My guess .. the journalist is a Hillary supporter.”

Hillary Lapdog.

As in ‘head in her lap’.


56 posted on 12/30/2007 3:13:09 PM PST by UCANSEE2 (Just saying what 'they' won't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: an amused spectator
What exactly did you see, and what did you want to see?

I saw a page from the paper but nothing with her name. However, after that, I came back to the thread and saw her picture posted and that's all I needed or wanted to see.
57 posted on 12/30/2007 4:16:26 PM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: LachlanMinnesota
Would like to comment but I have never seen "24"
58 posted on 12/30/2007 4:22:49 PM PST by Churchillspirit (We are all foot soldiers in this War On Terror.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: aruanan
Great post, a.

Reads like one of the old "Constitutionalist" FReepers...

59 posted on 12/30/2007 6:11:19 PM PST by an amused spectator (AGW: If you drag a hundred dollar bill through a research lab, you never know what you'll find)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: dayglored
When helen Thomas moves on, Jill Lawrence could take her place:


60 posted on 12/30/2007 6:34:55 PM PST by do the dhue (They've got us surrounded again. The poor bastards. General Creighton Abrams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson