Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Texas: Forced DUI Blood Draws Expand
Texas Police News ^ | 12/26/07 | Texas Police News

Posted on 12/28/2007 7:07:11 PM PST by elkfersupper

More Texas jurisdictions are turning to forced blood draws to convict those suspected of DUI.

Jurisdictions within Texas are expanding programs where police use force to draw blood from motorists accused of driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI). Last week, El Paso announced it had joined Harris and Wilson Counties in a "no refusal" program specifically designed to streamline the blood drawing process.

It works as follows. An accused motorist is arrested and taken downtown. While being videotaped, he will be asked to submit to a breathalyzer test with officers specifically avoiding any mention that blood will be taken by force if the often inaccurate breathalyzer test is refused.

During key holiday weekends, a pre-assigned judge who agreed to wait by the phone will approve search warrants created from pre-written templates -- often within just thirty minutes. With warrant in hand, a nurse whose salary is often paid by Mothers Against Drunk Drivers (MADD) will draw blood while police officers exert the required level of force. In some cases, this use of force can cause permanent damage. Montague, Archer and Clay counties have similar programs except that these departments do away with the nurse and have police officers perform the blood draw themselves, despite a state law banning the practice (view law).

Two of the twelve motorists subjected to the first blood draws in Harris County on Memorial Day weekend this year were later found to have blood alcohol levels below the .08 limit. The program will return on New Year's Eve.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism
KEYWORDS: donutwatch; madd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 441-444 next last
To: elkfersupper
Define "drunks".

Somebody who is pulled over for driving erratically or dangerously and blows a .10 or higher.

181 posted on 12/28/2007 8:57:46 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: eyedigress
The only concession I make is, a cop is checked every 8 hours while active.

No cops should have their blood drawn every two hours because they carry loaded guns and could be operating a gun under the influence. Better to be safe than sorry.

182 posted on 12/28/2007 8:57:50 PM PST by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: SomeCallMeTim
no one seems to care about the real problem.

Seems as though you're right.

183 posted on 12/28/2007 8:58:17 PM PST by SouthTexas (Have a Merry and Blessed Christmas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: eldoradude

That probably has washed through here at some point.


184 posted on 12/28/2007 8:59:20 PM PST by eyedigress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: Dr.Zoidberg

I agree but the statists far outnumber us on here.


185 posted on 12/28/2007 9:00:08 PM PST by darkangel82 (And the band played on....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: steel_resolve

Sorry... I have little compassion for people who are truly DRUNK, and driving on public roadways. There are ways to avoid this.

Ok.. maybe, 5 years is too much. But, I want to PUKE every time I read about someone being convicted of 4th, 5th, even 7th offense DWI. That just should NOT be possible.

We need serious laws, that go at the SOURCE of the serious problem. Not a bunch of laws that make criminals of people who are enjoying life and NOT being an undue burden on society.


186 posted on 12/28/2007 9:00:11 PM PST by SomeCallMeTim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: AmericaUnited

OK.


187 posted on 12/28/2007 9:00:11 PM PST by eyedigress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: eyedigress

:o


188 posted on 12/28/2007 9:00:32 PM PST by eyedigress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: elkfersupper
If I have to do or give up one more thing "for the children", I'm going to start throttling the little trolls myself.

LOLOLOL

And - pray tell - how will you do this?

With your Mop Bucket of Death?

Or maybe one of those Killer Toilets?

LOLOLOL

Geez Elk. You must know that other pro-drunk driving FReepers on this thread are wishing you would shut up, as you are embarrassing the cause.

189 posted on 12/28/2007 9:01:14 PM PST by Responsibility2nd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: A_Tradition_Continues
Can you back up your statement with real facts and stats?

The Chief of Police from Tarrant County was on TV tonight about this. Statistics show average 1000 deaths during the Thanksgiving - NY Holidays annually in Texas from drunken driving. Not just injuries - deaths. Something had to be done. Those numbers are incredible.

190 posted on 12/28/2007 9:01:49 PM PST by Hattie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

Awwwwww.... so you got hurt so now we all have to pay huh? Pathetic.


191 posted on 12/28/2007 9:02:00 PM PST by StolarStorm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard
Somebody who is pulled over for driving erratically or dangerously and blows a .10 or higher.

So why is the nationwide standard .08, headed to .05, and effectively 0.00?

192 posted on 12/28/2007 9:02:34 PM PST by elkfersupper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: eyedigress

Not in the law making business, but I know insanity when I see it. Those that want to bleed us and those that want to run over us, seems it’s on both sides.


193 posted on 12/28/2007 9:02:53 PM PST by SouthTexas (Have a Merry and Blessed Christmas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: elkfersupper

Elk. I’m now convinced you are right.

Changing tagline....


194 posted on 12/28/2007 9:03:33 PM PST by Responsibility2nd (More people are "murdered" (toddlers) by unattended mop buckets, toilets, bathtubs, etc. than are..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
I still have the marks (scars) of a time where I didn’t avoid a drunk driver.

Ok... well at least what most suspected you now admit. You want everyone else to loose their rights and freedoms due to an accident you had. Gee, my uncle died from incompetent medical care so I now want it mandated that every medical procedure must have 4 surgeons reviewing all and any procedures. Too bad that now your medical insurance/bills will quadruple.

195 posted on 12/28/2007 9:04:13 PM PST by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
I still have the marks (scars) of a time where I didn’t avoid a drunk driver.

Ahh, the "former smoker syndrome".

196 posted on 12/28/2007 9:04:23 PM PST by A_Tradition_Continues (Sanitized for your protection.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: elkfersupper

The do-gooders are on a roll. Like socialists, they will keep pushing. And every time somebody is killed by a drunk they get more ammo.


197 posted on 12/28/2007 9:05:17 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: Pravious
I can't believe that anyone on this forum would sanction this. I though I was having a nightmare and was on DU. I thought this was a forum where Conservatives associated. Guess I was wrong.
198 posted on 12/28/2007 9:05:57 PM PST by 2nd amendment mama ( www.2asisters.org | Self defense is a basic human right!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

“Hooray for Texas in doing this. It can only save lives.

Next..... Texas needs to join most other normal states and pass checkpoint sobriety laws.”

No reason to stop there, R2nd, the U.S. should just ban alcohol altogether, then tobacco, then transfats, then R2nd.


199 posted on 12/28/2007 9:06:32 PM PST by Rembrandt (We would have won Viet Nam w/o Dim interference.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
Geez Elk. You must know that other pro-drunk driving FReepers on this thread are wishing you would shut up, as you are embarrassing the cause.

Don't drink, don't drive drunk, don't tolerate those who do.

I am just sick of this silliness being legislated by you people who drink the MADD Koolaid.

200 posted on 12/28/2007 9:06:38 PM PST by elkfersupper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 441-444 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson