“There are real, measurable, and significant adverse environmental consequences to atmospheric carbon dioxide enrichment, but anthropogenic climate change isn’t one of them...”
Do you have an explanation of how the atmospheric physics and chemistry predicting that “greenhouse gases” will raise atmospheric temperature is incorrect? If so, you really ought to publish it, as this would totally shake up the world of climate modeling.
No, but I have researched the amounts of CO2 emitted into the atmosphere. Man's contribution accounts for about 3% of the total. Just 3%.
Algore and company are proposing we spend TRILLIONS of dollars to reduce our output by a small fraction of that 3%.
It would be more productive to get rid of the proponents of "global warming".
If it gets warmer, wouldn't we NEED LESS fuel to heat out homes in the winter, thereby cutting CO2 emissions?
GW is nothing more than a money making scheme by those related to the elixir salesmen of the old west....
There is no doubt that greenhouse gases raise the earth's temperature, the question is how much. Science has changed recently on this topic and is definitely not settled. The issues are how much warming is caused by CO2 in the upper atmosphere and how much warming is going to be caused by water vapor feedback throughout the atmosphere.
Your whole premise is wrong. Scientists are starting to realize that the evidence shows that warming precedes increased CO2 levels, not the other way around.