Gender equality: Schools have been told to encourage boys to play netball and take dancing lessons in addition to traditionally 'male sports'
Posted on 12/27/2007 12:06:29 PM PST by Stoat
Schools have been told to encourage boys to play netball and take dancing lessons in a bid to promote "gender equality".
The move which sees boys moving on to the traditionally female netball court is part of a Government drive to ensure that school children are more 'gender balanced'.
Every local authority in the country had to publish a "gender equality scheme" earlier this year to meet new anti-discrimination legislation.
Scroll down for more...
Gender equality: Schools have been told to encourage boys to play netball and take dancing lessons in addition to traditionally 'male sports'
As a result hundreds of schools have adopted schemes that suggest boys should take up traditionally female pursuits - and vice versa.
Schools most also ensure that more girls study traditionally masculine subjects such as science.
In preparing their guidelines for schools, a string of councils around the country, including Plymouth Leicester, Nottingham and Buckinghamshire posed the question: "Do you encourage girls to participate in rugby, cricket, football and basketball and boys in netball, rounders, badminton and dance?"
Schools are encouraged to develop "open-minded attitudes" and promote positive role models for boys and girls.
They are also asked: "Does your school challenge gender stereotyping?"
The requirement to publish a Gender Equality Scheme came into force in April this year and each local authority must revise and adapt its plan every three years.
The plan is a response to updated sex discrimination legislation that says it is unlawful for schools to provide classes for only one sex where this would amount to less favourable treatment of the other sex.
It has been taken by some cautious schools to mean that not offering netball lessons to boys is discriminatory.
However, some head teachers fear that council guidelines suggesting sports lessons be expanded to offer the same options to boys and girls could be a step too far.
Last night Mick Brookes, the general secretary of the National Association of Head Teachers, said: "It doesn't make sense to promote things to boys that they don't want to do, simply so you can tick a box on a form."
It is legal for schools to confine competitive sports to single sexes where strength, stamina or physique puts a girl at a disadvantage to a boy.
It appears, however, that some schools may be reading too much into guidelines.
Guidance from the Women Sports Foundation on gender equality says that provision of sports does not need to be identical, but it must attract the same resources and meet the same standards.
It says for example: "Schools will not be expected to run football or rugby teams for girls where there is no demand, nor will they have to run netball teams for boys.
"But if girls demand a rugby team, schools could be expected to provide it."
A spokesman for the Equality and Human Rights Commission said it had not specified that schools provide netball and dance for boys.
She said: "The gender equality duty puts a duty on all public sector employers and people who provide public services to take action to promote equality. It's about outcomes, it's not prescriptive."
I’m sick of this bullsh*t.
Just once I’d like to hear that a school or group of schools replied using the term “Grow a pair.”
Keep this up and the United Kingdom will become the United Caliphate.
I was watching a BBC show this year called Torchwood and the entire series displayed this fixation with homosexuality. Two girl characters kiss etc and two guy characters kiss etc. As morally corrupt as American society has become it pales in comparison to the mess in Great Britain. U.S. Army Retired |
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
That would be equality..
It’s easy. Just do like I did when my wife insisted I try “swing” dancing. I just threw her into the wall. She’s pretty much left me alone since then.
Pfft, we played netball with the girls when I was at school 20 years ago. And girls could play football if they wanted. Actually there was a girl who played on our Cub Scout team for a bit (makes a lot less difference at that age). We also played hockey in mixed sex classes at school as I recall.
Complete waste of time for someone to have to produce policy papers, and no doubt focus groups and some brand new buzz words to boot. On the plus side, if our stupid nanny state government is busying itself with stuff like this, it lessens the possibility of doing any damage meddling with anything important....
Ya know...back in my day, “gender balance” would mean you and your steady sittin’ on a fence, together.
This PC crap is gettin’ way, way outta hand.
What’s next, get rid of the British “stiff upper lip” as too masculine??
Fascinating. I’d never heard of “netball.” It sounds complicated.
What they need is gender equality in the committees and commissions that make up these policies—too many wimmin running the show, if you ask me. These are girly type policies—now, little boys, play nicely and share your toys.
Fire half the women on these committees and fill the water fountains with testosterone and then we’ll have gender equality.
Ping
I thought "Gender Balance" was like in 'Surf City,' "Two girls for every boy."
It’s very sad, but let’s face it, Great Britain is done for. The US must fight this evil alone.
I’m sick of this bullsh*t.
DITTO!
Scrum soon to be redefined.
I am too. I am again just shaking my head!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
