Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bomb wing will have more time to prepare for major inspection
Minot Daily News ^ | 20 December 2007 | Eloise Ogden

Posted on 12/20/2007 4:33:49 PM PST by Racehorse

The 5th Bomb Wing at Minot Air Force Base will be allowed more time to prepare for a major inspection that will help determine whether it will be recertified, base officials said Wednesday.

The bomb wing was decertified in a portion of its wartime mission after a late August incident when six nuclear-tipped cruise missiles were mistakenly loaded at the Minot base onto a B-52 bomber from Barksdale AFB, La. A Barksdale crew then flew the plane to the base in Louisiana.

Air Force officials at the Pentagon said the incident occurred because of airmen not following the proper procedures, along with a lack of leadership and supervision.

On Wednesday, a team of command-level inspectors completed an Initial Nuclear Surety Inspection of the bomb wing. The inspectors have been at the base since Sunday.

The inspectors at the base this week were here in advance of the official Nuclear Surety Inspection originally set to begin Jan. 23. The Nuclear Surety Inspection is a regularly scheduled inspection for the bomb wing. However, the successful completion of the Nuclear Surety Inspection and other inspections, as well as various high-level visits from Air Force officials, will determine whether the bomb wing will be recertified.

. . .

The bottom line is the command-level inspectors here this week determined more time is needed before the next inspection.

“The inspectors have determined we need more time to make the necessary changes and allow us to accomplish long-term solutions, including filling critical leadership billets that are currently vacant,” Arellano said. “We are thankful we can take the time needed rather than being forced into an artificial timeline, so the NSI will be postponed until the wing and the command are confident the right people and processes are in place.”

(Excerpt) Read more at minotdailynews.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Government
KEYWORDS: airforce; b52; minot; weapons
Guess the inspection team didn't much like what they saw.
1 posted on 12/20/2007 4:33:53 PM PST by Racehorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Racehorse
Guess the inspection team didn't much like what they saw.

Things were going great until they noticed the oddly shaped kegerator in the officer's club.

2 posted on 12/20/2007 4:43:26 PM PST by Steely Tom (Steely's First Law of the Main Stream Media: if it doesn't advance the agenda, it's not news.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Racehorse
The bottom line is the command-level inspectors here this week determined more time is needed before the next inspection.

Translation: More heads will roll and nobody's getting Christmas this year.

Been there, done that after a 1982 MSET fail at the 97 BMW.

3 posted on 12/20/2007 5:03:59 PM PST by TankerKC (You don't have to believe everything you think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Racehorse

I wonder how Minot did on their last NSI (and when was it?)


4 posted on 12/20/2007 5:10:13 PM PST by OCC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TankerKC

I was in a fighter wing that was in serious danger of failing an upcoming inspection. We flew on the evening of Dec 24...I told my family when I got home that night that I KNEW Santa was out, because we had nearly had a mid-air!


5 posted on 12/20/2007 5:11:05 PM PST by Mr Rogers (Amnesty is Huckabee's middle name!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: OCC

Oh, guess this answers that.

http://www.minot.af.mil/news/story.asp?id=123022008


6 posted on 12/20/2007 5:11:42 PM PST by OCC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TankerKC

I was lucky enough in my flying days in the KC-135 to never be in a Wing that failed a SAC IG or any other type of inspection, but had a couple of buddies that ended up in the wrong Wing at the wrong time. It was hell on earth from what they told me. No freaking Christmas this year a why not Minot. For you non-SAC trained folks freezing is the reason.


7 posted on 12/20/2007 5:31:00 PM PST by KC-10A BOOMER (Breakaway, Breakaway, Breakaway!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Racehorse

Xactly.


8 posted on 12/20/2007 5:33:11 PM PST by Jet Jaguar (Who would the terrorists vote for?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OCC

***I wonder how Minot did on their last NSI (and when was it?)***

Is that what they now call the ORI (Operational Readiness Inspection)?

Why not Minot!


9 posted on 12/20/2007 7:40:18 PM PST by Ruy Dias de Bivar (Only infidel blood can quench Muslim thirst-- Abdul-Jalil Nazeer al-Karouri)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Racehorse
To this day, I still do not unterstand why this was a proplem.

Can anyone explain?

10 posted on 12/20/2007 7:43:05 PM PST by Hunble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KC-10A BOOMER

***No freaking Christmas this year a why not Minot. For you non-SAC trained folks freezing is the reason.***

When the AF closed Walker AFB in Roswell, where I worked on the B-52(1966-1967), we used to joke about those being sent to Minot and Glasgow AFB. (Why not Minot! Beautiful summers, all two days of it!)

I ended up in Little Rock AFB working on the KC-135, 1967-1969.


11 posted on 12/20/2007 7:46:11 PM PST by Ruy Dias de Bivar (Only infidel blood can quench Muslim thirst-- Abdul-Jalil Nazeer al-Karouri)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Ruy Dias de Bivar

I think ORI’s are general readiness inspections for all units, while NSI’s are only done for nuclear capable units. I went through both and they both sucked! (but we passed)


12 posted on 12/20/2007 7:58:26 PM PST by OCC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Hunble
"Can anyone explain? "

The USAF lost track of six thermonuclear devices for long enough to fly on a B52 from Minot ND to Barksdale LA, and sit parked UNGUARDED on the runway overnite, if I understand the situation correctly.

13 posted on 12/20/2007 10:13:51 PM PST by matthew fuller (The destruction of the CIA tapes was indubitably intentional obstruction of treason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: KC-10A BOOMER
...but had a couple of buddies that ended up in the wrong Wing at the wrong time. It was hell on earth from what they told me.

One of my ships in the early '90s failed the dreaded OPPE (Operational Propulsion Plant Examination) which meant we were decertified from lighting off our engines and getting underway. Multiple heads rolled in the Engineering Department, and the CO and the Command Master Chief were both relieved too. The next three months until we were reinspected were probably the most miserable of my naval career and I wasn't even an engineer. And my brand new bride got a real eye-opener on what she was getting into.

14 posted on 12/20/2007 11:35:58 PM PST by GATOR NAVY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Racehorse

Why not Minot? Freezin’s the reason . . . it’s COLD, I’m told.

As a new arrival to a wing which had experienced an NSI bust, my crew commander and I had a chance to excel . . . and we did.

ICBMS — Delivery guaranteed in 30 minutes or less or your next one is free . . .


15 posted on 12/21/2007 1:47:08 AM PST by Skybird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hunble
To this day, I still do not unterstand why this was a proplem.

Can anyone explain?


When handling nuclear weapons, there are certain procedures that must be followed at all times. Some of those procedures go back decades, and for good reason. Those procedures were not followed, and the safeguards that should have been in place to catch the failures did not. This means that a large number of people failed to do their jobs.

When something this serious occurs, careers can and will be flushed down the toilet.

It may seem strange to civilians that careers can be ruined over one incident, but the USAF is very serious about the handling of nuclear weapons, and when you have a foul-up this bad, people do not deserve second chances. I think around half a dozen people have paid for the mistakes with their careers, with probably more on the way.
16 posted on 12/21/2007 6:29:54 AM PST by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson