The tawdriness of the Clintons will unfortunately get played out again for all to see.Unfortunately? I think the author means FORTUNATELY.
1 posted on
12/20/2007 8:11:14 AM PST by
jdm
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
To: jdm
Unless this info was the result of the FOIA, somebody is going after the Clintons at the knees.
2 posted on
12/20/2007 8:13:50 AM PST by
gov_bean_ counter
( Who is America's George Galloway?)
To: jdm
Old news. Americans want to talk about how Hillary is going to fight for change.
< /sarcasm>
3 posted on
12/20/2007 8:16:41 AM PST by
DManA
To: jdm
One supposes that the doubling of crude oil, and the settling of gasoline around $3.00 profits dots can be connected to Mrs. Clinton's war chest.
What would George Washington do?
5 posted on
12/20/2007 8:17:08 AM PST by
BlabItGrabIt
(Crude Oil Doubling Prosperous Housing Market Tanking = DIMS)
To: jdm
"we should take a look at the Clinton foreign policy of donations. The foundation took money from the Saudi royal family, the king of Morocco" Well, that didn't take long.
US proposes Lockheed Martin F-16 sale to Morocco
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1942303/posts
To: jdm
Guess who gave money to the Clintons?
That's a joke - guess which crooks didn't might be an easier question...
8 posted on
12/20/2007 8:21:48 AM PST by
Bon mots
To: jdm
The Saudis gave $10 million to the Clinton Library.
10 posted on
12/20/2007 8:24:59 AM PST by
Beckwith
(Dhimmicrats and the liberal media have chosen sides -- Islamofascism)
To: jdm
11 posted on
12/20/2007 8:25:22 AM PST by
Bon mots
To: jdm
Is “conservative” Ben Stein, columnist for the “conservative” American Spectator on that list also?
I mean, he appears fond of donating to nasty, lying liberal punks like Al Franken, so why not the Clintons?
13 posted on
12/20/2007 8:28:16 AM PST by
EyeGuy
To: jdm
Is “conservative” Ben Stein, columnist for the “conservative” American Spectator on that list also?
I mean, he appears fond of donating to nasty, lying liberal punks like Al Franken, so why not the Clintons?
14 posted on
12/20/2007 8:28:20 AM PST by
EyeGuy
To: jdm
Herself's campaign may just be the destruction of any whitewashed LEGACY for ol' billyboy.
He may have to kill her over that.
(Picture the last scene in Katherine Turner/Michael Douglas's movie, The War of the Roses.)
http://www.videodetective.com/titledetails.aspx?publishedid=1856
18 posted on
12/20/2007 8:49:40 AM PST by
bannie
To: jdm
“Remember the fit that the potential sale of management rights for American ports to a Dubai company started? “
Isn’t there a Madeleine Albright connection to that company?
19 posted on
12/20/2007 8:50:17 AM PST by
sageb1
(This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
To: jdm
I would have guessed it was the New York Times that donated millions.
20 posted on
12/20/2007 8:50:48 AM PST by
laotzu
To: jdm
I’m sick of reading Hillary threads.
\
\
Can someone just make a damn list?
21 posted on
12/20/2007 8:53:22 AM PST by
subterfuge
(HILLARY IS: She who must NOT be Dismayed)
To: jdm
"Guess Who Gave Millions To The Clintons?" Do I have to download some Chinese font support patch to view the list?
22 posted on
12/20/2007 9:04:03 AM PST by
yooling
(Bring the troops home; bring the war home)
To: jdm
Perhaps the author means this in the “Oh Geez, not this $hi+ again!” vein...?
23 posted on
12/20/2007 9:24:52 AM PST by
Rick.Donaldson
(http://www.transasianaxis.com - Visit for lastest on DPRK/Russia/China/Etc --Fred Thompson for Prez.)
To: jdm; Grampa Dave; SunkenCiv; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Liz
Other donations came from supporters who had been ensnared in campaign finance scandals surrounding Mr. Clintons 1996 re-election campaign.
24 posted on
12/20/2007 9:36:27 AM PST by
george76
(Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
To: george76; Ernest_at_the_Beach
25 posted on
12/20/2007 9:54:30 AM PST by
SunkenCiv
(Profile updated Tuesday, December 18, 2007___________________https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: jdm
I’m forwarding this along with some pics to a bunch of non-freepers who’ll be interested. Thanks.
27 posted on
12/20/2007 10:14:34 AM PST by
lilylangtree
(Veni, Vidi, Vici)
To: jdm
The tawdriness of the Clintons will unfortunately get played out again for all to see. .... Certainly, with the advent of the blogosphere, the peccadiloes and petty corruptions in which they engaged will no longer remain secret.
Yer Darn Tootin'!!!
And 'we' do our best work while in our PJs, Bunny Slippers and munching on Cheetos.
(okay, scratch the Bunny Slippers, that's too Rudy-esque)
28 posted on
12/20/2007 10:42:40 AM PST by
Condor51
(I wouldn't vote for Rooty under any circumstance -- even if Waterboarded!)
To: jdm
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson