Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Paul keeps donation from white supremacist: Aide: take money and 'try to spread the message'
AP ^ | 12-19-2007 | AP

Posted on 12/19/2007 2:12:32 PM PST by Westlander

Edited on 12/19/2007 2:32:28 PM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]

Aide: Candidate to take money and 'try to spread the message of freedom'

Republican presidential hopeful Ron Paul has received a $500 campaign donation from a white supremacist, and the Texas congressman doesn't plan to return it, an aide said Wednesday.

Don Black, of West Palm Beach, recently made the donation, according to campaign filings. He runs a Web site called Stormfront with the motto, "White Pride World Wide." The site welcomes postings to the "Stormfront White Nationalist Community."

Excerpt


TOPICS: Breaking News; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 911truthers; donation; donors; elections; fundraising; macacamoment; neonazi; paul; paulestinians; rino; ronpaul; stormfront; supremacist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-214 next last
To: Westlander

I’ve read through stormfront, and this isn’t a crowd of people conservatives should ever see as reputable. Marginalize them and avoid them.

Ron Paul should do the same, if he wants any reputation at all.


161 posted on 12/19/2007 8:56:04 PM PST by Rick_Michael (The Anti-Federalists failed....so will the Anti-Frederalists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jean S
That check did not come in recently, this is an old story, in case you didn't know.

Giving Don Black money now I think would be wrong, because as I just said, it would just go to what Don Black wants, instead of something good. But hey, if you like the idea of a racist having more money, that's up to you.

162 posted on 12/19/2007 8:59:54 PM PST by incindiary (Washington needs a doctor, not another lawyer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: incindiary
But hey, if you like the idea of a racist having more money, that's up to you.

Do you realize how ridiculous that sounds? Come on. Paul can burn it, donate it, return it, whatever, but the argument that he would make the racist richer by returning his money is a reach. You Paulistas look more stupid every day.

163 posted on 12/19/2007 9:04:44 PM PST by Jean S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: Jean S

Maybe he should burn it or something...but I’d be damned before I got caught stroking a $500 check to a known Nazi, regardless.


164 posted on 12/19/2007 9:11:29 PM PST by beezdotcom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: Jean S
I didn't say he would make him richer, you're trying to put words in my mouth.

But right now, the racist is 500 dollars poorer, and that money will go towards promoting freedom and restoring our rights and protecting the constitution. From my perspective, it is better for it to go to THAT, than for some racist creep to have it.

165 posted on 12/19/2007 9:14:25 PM PST by incindiary (Washington needs a doctor, not another lawyer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: incindiary

I apologize. I din’t mean to put words in your mouth. I was only quoting you.

If Paul spends this money on his campaign he’s no better than the racist who donated it.


166 posted on 12/19/2007 9:17:19 PM PST by Jean S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: Jean S
You were quoting me? Can you post where I said: "Giving Don Black this money would make him 500 dollars richer"?

And your last line was another falsehood, but as a Paul hater, I'm sure you probably think that any money going to Paul's campaign is bad. Whatever. Who do you support, btw?

167 posted on 12/19/2007 9:26:12 PM PST by incindiary (Washington needs a doctor, not another lawyer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: incindiary

Sheesh. Read my replies. I only quoted one comment you made.
You’re paranoid and a waste of my time.


168 posted on 12/19/2007 9:32:28 PM PST by Jean S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush
...so it's obvious that the two-party cartel and MSM are running scared.

I was thinking the same thing, wow Ron Paul must be doing really well for all of this fuss.

169 posted on 12/19/2007 9:37:46 PM PST by murphE (These are days when the Christian is expected to praise every creed but his own. --G.K. Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Jean S
You: "but the argument that he would make the racist richer by returning his money is a reach.You Paulistas look more stupid every day."

Me: "I didn't say he would make him richer, you're trying to put words in my mouth."

You: "I din’t mean to put words in your mouth. I was only quoting you."

And then I asked you to point out what exactly you were quoting. (if that's ok with you, that I prefer to not be misquoted) But if you don't want to answer, fine. I'm also tired of this conversation.

170 posted on 12/19/2007 9:41:27 PM PST by incindiary (Washington needs a doctor, not another lawyer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: montag813

“I guess it doesn’t hurt that Paul shares the Aryan Nation’s position on the state of Israel.”

To be fair his position is to end all foreign aid and meddling in other countries affairs.

The Bush position was apparent at Annapolis - the Saudi plan, with Israel dividing Jerusalem.

He ran in 2000 and 2004 on the promise to move th US embassy to Jerusalem - it hasn’t happened yet.

Bush has pushed for more serious concessions from Israel than Clinton did!


171 posted on 12/19/2007 9:43:35 PM PST by GovernmentIsTheProblem (The GOP is "Whig"ing out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: imjimbo

LOL! I can’t stop reading it now!


172 posted on 12/19/2007 9:45:30 PM PST by endthematrix (He was shouting 'Allah!' but I didn't hear that. It just sounded like a lot of crap to me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: incindiary
I quoted a comment in #163 that you made in #162. It's the only time I "put words in your mouth".

. But hey, if you like the idea of a racist having more money, that's up to you.

173 posted on 12/19/2007 9:47:37 PM PST by Jean S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: Jean S
Thank you! For finally answering the question. lol

Not to be nitpicky, but I wasn't saying he was going to make a profit. :-p (of course he's not going to have more than what he originally started out with) I just meant from this point forward. Right now he is out 500. If gets the money back, he has 500 more than what he had 5 minutes ago. But this arguing is silly. It was a misunderstanding of my words.

174 posted on 12/19/2007 10:01:10 PM PST by incindiary (Washington needs a doctor, not another lawyer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: incindiary

You’re right. We got into a stupid argument. Sorry about that.


175 posted on 12/19/2007 10:04:37 PM PST by Jean S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: Westlander
Taking the long view on this, perhaps it is better that Dr. Paul is relatively harmless in Congress.

Think about how much real damage he could be doing to real people, his patients!

176 posted on 12/19/2007 10:07:36 PM PST by MindBender26 (Is FR worth our time anymore? All the "fun" sees to be gone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fabozz
Hey, just out of curiosity, what changed between now and 10/25, when you said "If his campaign did knowingly take money from white supremacists, they [sic] should be returned..."?

Virtually, nothing.

Here's what I said in your linky:

(A) He hasn't returned the money, but I can understand his rationale for not doing so. Paul's critics want to get him into a situation where he's on the defensive apologizing for beliefs he doesn't believe in, which makes him weak in the eyes of voters. See what happened to George Allen & Trent Lott.

(B) He has denounced white supremacists on the PBS special last Friday. He has a statement that denounces racism on his campaign website.

177 posted on 12/19/2007 10:12:03 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Congratulations Brett Favre! All-time NFL leader in career passing yards)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Dude, why are you always pinging the Mods and Jim? We’re adults here, OK?


178 posted on 12/19/2007 10:14:07 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Congratulations Brett Favre! All-time NFL leader in career passing yards)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Jean S

But Jean, you don’t give a damn one way or another who Paul gets the money from. You’re not going to vote for him anyway. So why the faux outrage?


179 posted on 12/19/2007 10:15:55 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Congratulations Brett Favre! All-time NFL leader in career passing yards)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: MplsSteve

180 posted on 12/19/2007 10:18:35 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Congratulations Brett Favre! All-time NFL leader in career passing yards)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-214 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson