Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

USDA Bets the Farm on Animal ID Program
The Nation ^ | December 14, 2007 | David E. Gumpert

Posted on 12/18/2007 6:35:59 AM PST by davidgumpert

NAIS, which the US Department of Agriculture has been rolling out in concert with many states since 2003, is stunning in its projected scope. Over the next few years each of the nation's 1.4 million farms (plus thousands of veterinary facilities, export/import stations, livestock barns and genetic facilities) will be affected, with all their approximately 95 million cattle, 1.8 billion chickens, 60 million pigs, 93 million turkeys, 6.3 million sheep, 2.5 million goats and every other livestock species, including bison, camelids, cervids, horses and llamas. In all, more than twenty-nine species and more than two billion animals are slated to be fitted with the ID tags or be injected with transponders that transmit, to a national network of databases, information as basic as date of birth and as sophisticated as DNA profiles and chemical-residue measurements in the bloodstream.

NAIS, ostensibly intended to contain disease outbreaks among livestock, has sparked the most severe political backlash rural America has seen in decades.

(Excerpt) Read more at thenation.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: disease; farm; nais; tagging; usda
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last
To: SJSAMPLE

The govt just doesn’t need to be in that business. It is trying to build a huge bureaucracy because of wealthy agribusiness lobbyists. These lobbyists have exempted their employers from most provisions, knowing that the small farmers would be stuck paying for it. History tells us that the scope will grow too. Small farmers will get to foot the bill for an expensive homeland security program that only a handful of lobbyists want. Its like the water, land use & environmental regulations all over again.

Responsible personal recordkeeping can do everything the govt electronic database program can do. Farmers are used to occasional losses. When the govt is involved, they are guaranteed a loss.


21 posted on 12/18/2007 10:19:42 AM PST by FreeInWV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: davidgumpert

It’s being pushed by large agribusinesses because they know it will force smaller farmers and ranchers out of business.

Just another case of one group of business people using the power of government to shut down a free market and force their competition out of business. And Republicans are rolling with it.


22 posted on 12/18/2007 10:24:08 AM PST by VirginiaConstitutionalist (Illegals contribute more taxes than welfare recipients. Maybe we're deporting the wrong people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJSAMPLE
That USDA took significant notice of what happened in Europe with both mad cow and hoof & mouth disease and doesn’t want to see the meat industry COLLAPSE from such a catastrophe.

Except you can already track that. That's why we haven't had an outbreak and even things like E.coli can be tracked back to the exact processing equipment and farm the animal came from.

It's just a scam by Cargill, etc. with larger profit margins to drive up the cost of production and force their competition out of business.

23 posted on 12/18/2007 10:26:19 AM PST by VirginiaConstitutionalist (Illegals contribute more taxes than welfare recipients. Maybe we're deporting the wrong people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SJSAMPLE

Why is it the government’s job to protect major meat growers, all large corporations, from negligence in their business practices ?

And coincidentally, destroy the jobs of small farmers in the process.

Let’s see - who benefits ?

Hmmm - that would be the major corporations, the same ones already sucking off the $20 billion farm subsidy teat.


24 posted on 12/19/2007 12:51:06 PM PST by cinives (On some planets what I do is considered normal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: larry hagedon

We have to differ here just a bit. Your concerns are all correct, but speaking as the owner of 3 sport horses that compete all over the US and who often leave the farm for training, shows, etc, or just to hack out across neighboring farms, the paperwork necessary to just go on a one hour hack across 14 other farms would be prohibitive, expensive, and just lead to noncompliance because of the onerous nature.

The government is deep in the process of facilitating a fascist state.


25 posted on 12/19/2007 12:56:13 PM PST by cinives (On some planets what I do is considered normal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: cinives

Real good points my friend, I was not aware of the details you bring up.

larry


26 posted on 12/19/2007 4:05:28 PM PST by larry hagedon (born and raised and retired in Iowa.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: mtbopfuyn

Maybe. There are companies working on it.


27 posted on 12/30/2007 7:16:28 PM PST by davidgumpert (More on problems with raw milk availability in Michigan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cvq3842

Don’t rule it out...


28 posted on 12/30/2007 7:17:14 PM PST by davidgumpert (More on problems with raw milk availability in Michigan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ingtar

Requiring 4H kids to push their parents to participate in NAIS is one of the most distasteful aspects of the entire program.


29 posted on 12/30/2007 7:18:23 PM PST by davidgumpert (More on problems with raw milk availability in Michigan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SJSAMPLE

The European experiences were the result of the worst of factory farming practices. The solution here is to encourage appropriate sanitation and feeding practices, to inhibit disease, not to implement a boondoggle of a program that forces smaller farms out of business.


30 posted on 12/30/2007 7:22:03 PM PST by davidgumpert (More on problems with raw milk availability in Michigan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Ender Wiggin

No size limits. So anyone who has a few chickens for their own eggs or a couple of goats for milk has to report the animals, and report to the government every time they wander into a neighbor’s yard.


31 posted on 12/30/2007 7:24:01 PM PST by davidgumpert (More on problems with raw milk availability in Michigan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: larry hagedon

I think you’ve captured well the craziness of this boondoggle.


32 posted on 12/30/2007 7:26:18 PM PST by davidgumpert (More on problems with raw milk availability in Michigan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: olezip

You’ve got it.


33 posted on 12/30/2007 7:27:27 PM PST by davidgumpert (More on problems with raw milk availability in Michigan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: call meVeronica

Yes, they want to be sure you don’t violate any Monsanto (or other corporate) patents, and will fine you big dollars if you do, even inadvertently.


34 posted on 12/30/2007 7:29:13 PM PST by davidgumpert (More on problems with raw milk availability in Michigan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: davidgumpert

I’d think there was a conspiracy to divorce most people, and especially kids, from any experience with farm animals or agriculture. So where is the great crusader Micheal Moore on this? It will just lead to more corruption, massive noncompliance and perhaps a civil war. Wars over food are the worst. I don’t want to see this happening, but they are playing with fire in the long term.


35 posted on 12/30/2007 7:45:42 PM PST by coydog (Keep Canada green - paint a Liberal!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: davidgumpert

This is an attack on self-sufficiency guised as a “health” program. Centuries of small farms, self producing families and people who don’t need the government for anything other than “peace and tranquilty” will be be wiped out in a generation in favor of factory farms.

All the easier to reduce the amount of non-participants in a future cashless society.


36 posted on 12/30/2007 7:56:48 PM PST by Rb ver. 2.0 (Global warming is the new Marxism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rb ver. 2.0

Oh, well... people can start breeding meat animals too small to attract attention ... rabbits, even guinea pigs and mice, can be eaten.


37 posted on 12/30/2007 8:02:17 PM PST by coydog (Keep Canada green - paint a Liberal!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: coydog

The initial phase of the animal ID is large stock. The policy includes when fully implemented ALL animals raised for consumption, even fish and fowl and rabbits with ability for expansion.


38 posted on 12/31/2007 7:18:22 AM PST by call meVeronica
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: call meVeronica

Which shows me that they’d have to get an awful lot more intrusive if you just buy a couple of rabbits from the pet store and breed them in your home. How is anyone else going to know? I just see loads of corruption and black market potential there.


39 posted on 12/31/2007 10:55:26 AM PST by coydog (Keep Canada green - paint a Liberal!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson