To: pabianice
You're not going to get 40 tons of CO2 out of 1200 pounds of jet fuel. You would probably get a little under 2 tons.
33 posted on
12/17/2007 12:19:39 PM PST by
KarlInOhio
(Government is the hired help - not the boss. When politicians forget that they must be fired.)
To: KarlInOhio
You may be right, but you'd also get trillions of tons of air with an extremely slightly elevated carbon dioxide concentration.
39 posted on
12/17/2007 12:25:20 PM PST by
coloradan
(Failing to protect the liberties of your enemies establishes precedents that will reach to yourself.)
To: KarlInOhio
Good point, but I make it 4400 lbs, more than 2 tons.
55 posted on
12/17/2007 12:42:10 PM PST by
expatpat
To: KarlInOhio
You're not going to get 40 tons of CO2 out of 1200 pounds of jet fuel. You would probably get a little under 2 tons. I think you're a lot closer than the 40 tons that's claimed.
By my rough calculation: Each atom of carbon burned (atomic weight 12) combines with two atoms of oxygen (each atomic weight 16) and results in a CO2 molecule with an atomic weight of 44. Ignoring the hydrogen atoms (atomic weight 1), 1200 pounds of jet fuel, if all carbon, would result in about 4400 pounds of CO2 produced.
94 posted on
12/17/2007 1:24:25 PM PST by
Bob
To: KarlInOhio
Re-read the numbers. 2400 lbs (pounds) of jet fuel, 800 lbs (pounds) of CO
2.
Cheers!
210 posted on
12/18/2007 4:51:02 PM PST by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson