Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Future looks dim for incandescent bulbs (President Bush has said he will sign this nonsense)
Hattiesburg American | 12/17/07 | PAUL DAVIDSON

Posted on 12/17/2007 5:23:48 AM PST by Libloather

Link only -

The story...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: agw; bulbs; darksociety; energy; freedom; ids; incandescent; lightpollution; mercury
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-144 next last
To: the OlLine Rebel
I have to ask - isn’t flourescent ALWAYS “high intensity

I don't think so. I thought "high intensity" was used to describe things like the new automotive headlamps, but I'm no expert.

41 posted on 12/17/2007 6:19:11 AM PST by from occupied ga (Your most dangerous enemy is your own government, Benito Guilinni a short man in search of a balcony)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: NavyCanDo

When I got out of the reef tank hobby several years ago, CF lights were just starting to be introduced as a potential replacement for the MH bulbs. I was running VHO fluorescents but was disappointed with the results - has anything changed?


42 posted on 12/17/2007 6:19:17 AM PST by NY.SS-Bar9 (DR #1692)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

A few years ago we had a Chinese engineer working for us. During lunch hours, he used to repair light bulbs. He’d drill a a small hole near the base of the bulb, attach a new tungsten wire filament, draw a vacuum on the bulb and then seal it again. I thought he was nuts and cheap, it might be that we need to do this in the future.


43 posted on 12/17/2007 6:19:23 AM PST by BuffaloJack (Before the government can give you a dollar it must first take it from another American)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
Hey, what about Christmas lights?

CFLs suck! Give a crummy light.

44 posted on 12/17/2007 6:20:49 AM PST by upchuck (Hildabeaste as Prez... unimaginable, devastating misery! She will redefine "How bad can it get?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NavyCanDo
The place I am excited about using them this year is on my outside Christmas decorations.

Well that's the point - you can use them where you want to, for now. But with Kongress and King George II in the act you will no longer have a choice.

45 posted on 12/17/2007 6:21:07 AM PST by from occupied ga (Your most dangerous enemy is your own government, Benito Guilinni a short man in search of a balcony)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Incandescent bulb’s days are numbered anyway. If not by govt fiat then by competition. I’m personally waiting for LED lighting to hit the market.


46 posted on 12/17/2007 6:21:08 AM PST by saganite (Lust type what you what in the “tagline” space)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: avacado

“cleaner/whiter light with less wattage than incandescent blubs.”

Yep, I have slowley changed to halogen and florescent, and have reduced my electric bill by 25%. I am now looking at LED’s to get an additional 25%.

Nothing to do with global warming, I’m just a cheapskate.

....Bob


47 posted on 12/17/2007 6:23:04 AM PST by Lokibob (Some people are like slinkys. Useless, but if you throw them down the stairs, you smile.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

So, just out of curiosity (for anyone who knows) how are you supposed to use them in place of three way bulbs?


48 posted on 12/17/2007 6:24:03 AM PST by Dad was my hero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NY.SS-Bar9
- has anything changed?

Now you'll get the same disappointing results but be required by law to use them. As far as improvements the bulbs are most likely the same as before.

49 posted on 12/17/2007 6:24:36 AM PST by Hillarys Gate Cult (The man who said "there's no such thing as a stupid question" has never talked to Helen Thomas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: advance_copy
I hope the people who work in GE and Phillips light bulb plants are happy that their jobs are being sent over to China.

I like the CFL curly lights for some applications.

I'm more than a little annoyed that they're all made in Red China.

Incandescents are made in USA.

I try to avoid supporting the Peoples' Liberation Army.

50 posted on 12/17/2007 6:26:49 AM PST by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilisation is aborting, buggering, and contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Crazieman

Who is addressing the mercury in the landfills. Oh, the humanity.


51 posted on 12/17/2007 6:27:33 AM PST by gathersnomoss (General George Patton had it right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lokibob
"Nothing to do with global warming, I’m just a cheapskate."

Me too. I am just cheap.

52 posted on 12/17/2007 6:27:58 AM PST by avacado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Dad was my hero

Your not. The government has decided that you don’t need that feature of a lamp anymore and you’d better like it. And thank them for it.

Just imagine a 3 way bulb with the two brightest filaments burnt out.


53 posted on 12/17/2007 6:28:49 AM PST by Hillarys Gate Cult (The man who said "there's no such thing as a stupid question" has never talked to Helen Thomas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: avacado
Halogen blubs ARE incandescent.

The difference is that they have an "ozone-depleting" gas (can you see where that's gonna be headed?), which, when the bulb is turned off, replates the tungsten ions back onto the filament. The result is that the filament lasts longer, since it's not constantly ablating metal (at least, not at the same rate), and, it doesn't darken with use, since the metal doesn't plate itself onto the envelope.

Apparently, though, these things need to run HOT in order to get that tungsten-halogen cycle going -- which means they have to use quartz envelopes, they have to have UV protection over them (unless you don't value your eyes), and, they present a very real fire hazard.

I'd start thinking about stocking up on the kind of thing that will NEVER have a nonconventional replacement, i.e., the utility bulbs in your refrigerator and oven.

Remember what happened to Freon after, when the patent expired and it was no longer profitable to manufacture it, they held the (spit) "Rio" Accord, and outlawed it -- quietly?

The can of freon that you could buy to recharge your car's AC -- for maybe 75 CENTS -- quickly flew up to maybe twenty DOLLARS -- when you could find it.

And, remember the halogen fire extinguisher? (AKA "Halon")

Remember how it was heralded as the first truly revolutionary means for fire-fighting? It killed the combustion process at a molecular level. Truly remarkable stuff.

Truly EEEEVUL stuff, though -- for the greenies. So, abracadabra, no more halogen fire extinguishers -- except for use in (the irony, the irony), jet engines.

Each jet engine has a halogen bottle. If the engine catches fire, the pilot dumps the bottle, because that's the ONLY way to put OUT the fire.

The irony is, the location that this is apt to happen, i.e., the stratosphere! Oh, the ozone, the ozone! LOL!

Anyway, a Halon bottle that sold for two or three bucks (a little one-shot dealie) was suddenly worth an arm and a leg. Bigger extinguishers got more and more expensive as the supply dried up.

Freon and Halogen became gaseous gold.

Expect the same thing to happen with the common 100W lightbulb (the first one targetted for destruction).

I sure am glad we didn't get Al Gore running the country. Otherwise, stuff like THIS would be happening!

Oh, wait...

PS: As to halogen lights? Call me cynical, but I expect they'll be "tolerated" for a while -- to make the bitter pill easier to swallow -- and then, once the deal is done, they'll be outlawed (after all, they DO have that Devil Halogen in them).

And then there's the poor woman who had to pay several thousand bucks "toxic cleanup" because she dropped a CF bulb onto her carpeted floor...

Land of the free. Keep repeating it. Who knows? Maybe you'll end up believing it!

PPS: Do you own a projector? (slide/movie/LCD) Might want to stock up on bulbs for that too, while you still can.

54 posted on 12/17/2007 6:29:29 AM PST by Don Joe (We've traded the Rule of Law for the Law of Rule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Crazieman
Well--some enterprising person should corner the market on the light bulbs now, and warehouse them until the time comes.

Of course, if I did that, by the time they were outlawed, some new politicians would rescind the law, and I'd be stuck with them--LOL!

55 posted on 12/17/2007 6:30:04 AM PST by basil (Support the Second Amendment--buy another gun today!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: the OlLine Rebel

I dunno about the intensity, but I know that under fluorescent lighting, I suddenly become vain. Usually, as a male, I’m happy with clean clothes and a shave. But under fluorescent lighting I suddenly realize that I have many flaws on my face. LOL.


56 posted on 12/17/2007 6:30:23 AM PST by RockinRight (Fred Thompson spells gravitas B-A-L-L-S-O-F-S-T-E-E-L.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
Before I’ll spend the rest of my life suffering from the headaches florescent lights give me, I’ll break out the oil lamps and candles.

I’ve always thought it would be nice to Freep by candle light anyway...

57 posted on 12/17/2007 6:30:31 AM PST by Dr.Zoidberg (Mohammedanism - Bringing you only the best of the 6th century for fourteen hundred years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey

If your belief becomes the widely held belief among consumers, flourescents will win in the market-place without interference from government. That is the way it should be done.

If, for some reason there would be some negative unintended consequences, they would fail in the market-place. With the government involved, we are stuck with a flourescents, good or bad. Government is very unlikely to back off, even if they are wrong.

We have some new technology. Let the market decide if it is an improvement.


58 posted on 12/17/2007 6:30:39 AM PST by Cracker Jack (If it weren't for the democrats, republicans would be the worst thing in Washington.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: ArrogantBustard

I hate to put on the tinfoil but I wonder if that’s part of the reson for this...


59 posted on 12/17/2007 6:31:19 AM PST by RockinRight (Fred Thompson spells gravitas B-A-L-L-S-O-F-S-T-E-E-L.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Ditter
Most of mine have lasted for years. I have them inside and out, up side down, in lamps and in closed fixtures and I am very pleased...

Have you used them with a dimmer? I have and the failure rate so far is 100%. And I've found that full on, supermarket-bright fluorescents sorta kill the mood when I slap on my Barry White CD's...
60 posted on 12/17/2007 6:31:24 AM PST by itsamelman (Announcing your plans is a good way to hear God laugh. - - Al Swearengen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-144 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson