See 166 above
Hm. OK ... so the ordnance is somewhere other than in the rules for security agencies? How ... odd. I can say that it is very widely ignored if there is a law agin’ it.
Urban legend? Which part of the post I put up there is urban legend? Other than the fact the last line wants to put the onus on Congress to pass “tighter” assault weapon laws. LOL
I know “Dragonman” personally. He is wont to say odd things from time to time too, but I’ve never known him to say anything about anyone “only needing 5 or 6 bullets” or whatever that article quoted him as saying.
I shoot at his range, and bought two 9MM weapons at his place.
Ok... I think I’m tracking now.
Xenia says there is a law, and the rest of us say “Nope”.
So, there is not a regulation that *I* can find specific to carrying a revolver vs. a semiautomatic. There is a rule about carrying concealed.
That one I saw. There are some other ordinances listed I’ve not been able to find or go through yet, but I’m aware of many security guards who carry semiautomatic weapons, in uniform. Off duty, they carry concealed or not at all.
The article I posted in 166 I think you were talking about was from the LA Times, and who knows where they pulled their information from, but it apparently wasn’t all local here in Colorado Springs.
I’d say, given their penchant for taking the Leftist side of things, and specifically quoting the jerk from Brady, they are intent on pushing the “Let’s get Congress to ban big guns” line.
That article is anything but “equal time” or fair minded, by the way. And just because a news article says it, doesn’t MEAN it’s true.